IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/envmet/v32y2021i4ne2668.html

Causal inference for quantile treatment effects

Author

Listed:
  • Shuo Sun
  • Erica E. M. Moodie
  • Johanna G. Nešlehová

Abstract

Analyses of environmental phenomena often are concerned with understanding unlikely events such as floods, heatwaves, droughts, or high concentrations of pollutants. Yet the majority of the causal inference literature has focused on modeling means, rather than (possibly high) quantiles. We define a general estimator of the population quantile treatment (or exposure) effects (QTE)—the weighted QTE (WQTE)—of which the population QTE is a special case, along with a general class of balancing weights incorporating the propensity score (PS). Asymptotic properties of the proposed WQTE estimators are derived. We further propose and compare PS regression and two weighted methods based on these balancing weights to understand the causal effect of an exposure on quantiles, allowing for the exposure to be binary, discrete, or continuous. Finite sample behavior of the three estimators is studied in simulation. The proposed methods are applied to data taken from the Bavarian Danube catchment area to estimate the 95% QTE of phosphorus on copper concentration in the river.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuo Sun & Erica E. M. Moodie & Johanna G. Nešlehová, 2021. "Causal inference for quantile treatment effects," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:32:y:2021:i:4:n:e2668
    DOI: 10.1002/env.2668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2668
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/env.2668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linda Mhalla & Valérie Chavez‐Demoulin & Debbie J. Dupuis, 2020. "Causal mechanism of extreme river discharges in the upper Danube basin network," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(4), pages 741-764, August.
    2. Sebastian Engelke & Adrien S. Hitz, 2020. "Graphical models for extremes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(4), pages 871-932, September.
    3. Sergio Firpo, 2007. "Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Quantile Treatment Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 259-276, January.
    4. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
    5. Matias D. Cattaneo & David M. Drukker & Ashley D. Holland, 2013. "Estimation of multivalued treatment effects under conditional independence," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 13(3), pages 407-450, September.
    6. Alberto Abadie & Joshua Angrist & Guido Imbens, 2002. "Instrumental Variables Estimates of the Effect of Subsidized Training on the Quantiles of Trainee Earnings," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 91-117, January.
    7. S. M. Samarasinghe & M. C. McGraw & E. A. Barnes & I. Ebert‐Uphoff, 2019. "A study of links between the Arctic and the midlatitude jet stream using Granger and Pearl causality," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), June.
    8. Cattaneo, Matias D., 2010. "Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 155(2), pages 138-154, April.
    9. Michael P. Wallace & Erica E. M. Moodie, 2015. "Doubly‐robust dynamic treatment regimen estimation via weighted least squares," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 636-644, September.
    10. Victor Chernozhukov & Christian Hansen, 2005. "An IV Model of Quantile Treatment Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 245-261, January.
    11. Brian K Lee & Justin Lessler & Elizabeth A Stuart, 2011. "Weight Trimming and Propensity Score Weighting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-6, March.
    12. Keisuke Hirano & Guido W. Imbens & Geert Ridder, 2003. "Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 1161-1189, July.
    13. Megan C. Kirchmeier-Young & Francis W. Zwiers & Nathan P. Gillett & Alex J. Cannon, 2017. "Attributing extreme fire risk in Western Canada to human emissions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 365-379, September.
    14. Fan Li & Kari Lock Morgan & Alan M. Zaslavsky, 2018. "Balancing Covariates via Propensity Score Weighting," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(521), pages 390-400, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hensher, David A. & Balbontin, Camila & Beck, Matthew J. & Wei, Edward, 2024. "Commuting mode choice and work from home in the later stages of COVID-19: Consolidating a future focussed prediction tool to inform transport and land use planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. Christopher L. Erickson & Peter Norlander, 2022. "How the past of outsourcing and offshoring is the future of post‐pandemic remote work: A typology, a model and a review," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 71-89, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alejo, Javier & Galvao, Antonio F. & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel, 2018. "Quantile continuous treatment effects," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 13-36.
    2. Zongwu Cai & Ying Fang & Ming Lin & Shengfang Tang, 2021. "A Nonparametric Test for Testing Heterogeneity in Conditional Quantile Treatment Effects," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 202117, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2021.
    3. Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Fernández‐Val & Blaise Melly, 2013. "Inference on Counterfactual Distributions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(6), pages 2205-2268, November.
    4. Zongwu Cai & Ying Fang & Ming Lin & Shengfang Tang, 2020. "Inferences for Partially Conditional Quantile Treatment Effect Model," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 202005, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Feb 2020.
    5. Ferreira,Francisco H. G. & Firpo,Sergio & Galvao,Antonio F., 2017. "Estimation and inference for actual and counterfactual growth incidence curves," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7933, The World Bank.
    6. Gernandt, Johannes & Maier, Michael & Pfeiffer, Friedhelm & Rat-Wirtzler, Julie, 2006. "Distributional effects of the high school degree in Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 06-088, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    7. Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna & Xiaojun Song & Qi Xu, 2022. "Covariate distribution balance via propensity scores," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(6), pages 1093-1120, September.
    8. Callaway, Brantly & Li, Tong & Oka, Tatsushi, 2018. "Quantile treatment effects in difference in differences models under dependence restrictions and with only two time periods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 395-413.
    9. Volpe Martincus, Christian & Carballo, Jerónimo, 2010. "Beyond the average effects: The distributional impacts of export promotion programs in developing countries," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 201-214, July.
    10. Neng-Chieh Chang, 2020. "The Mode Treatment Effect," Papers 2007.11606, arXiv.org.
    11. Markus Frolich & Blaise Melly, 2010. "Estimation of quantile treatment effects with Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 10(3), pages 423-457, September.
    12. Liao, Wen-Chi & Zhao, Daxuan, 2019. "The selection and quantile treatment effects on the economic returns of green buildings," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 38-48.
    13. Hong, Han & Nekipelov, Denis, 2012. "Efficient local IV estimation of an empirical auction model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 168(1), pages 60-69.
    14. Ai, Chunrong & Linton, Oliver & Zhang, Zheng, 2022. "Estimation and inference for the counterfactual distribution and quantile functions in continuous treatment models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 39-61.
    15. Li, Zhonghua & Luo, Lan & Wang, Jingshen & Feng, Long, 2025. "Efficient quantile covariate adjusted response adaptive experiments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 249(PA).
    16. Zeqin Liu & Zongwu Cai & Ying Fang & Ming Lin, 2019. "Statistical Analysis and Evaluation of Macroeconomic Policies: A Selective Review," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 201904, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Mar 2019.
    17. Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna, 2016. "Program Evaluation with Right-Censored Data," Papers 1604.02642, arXiv.org.
    18. Shengfang Tang & Zongwu Cai & Ying Fang & Ming Lin, 2020. "A New Quantile Treatment Effect Model for Studying Smoking Effect on Birth Weight During Mother's Pregnancy," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 202003, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Feb 2020.
    19. Volpe Martincus, Christian & Carballo, Jerónimo, 2010. "Beyond the average effects: The distributional impacts of export promotion programs in developing countries," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 201-214, July.
    20. Brantly Callaway & Weige Huang, 2020. "Distributional Effects of a Continuous Treatment with an Application on Intergenerational Mobility," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 82(4), pages 808-842, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:32:y:2021:i:4:n:e2668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.