IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i6p7235-7253.html

The Power and Pitfalls of Photographs in Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Experimental Insights on Trust and Environmental Responsibility Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenz Fenk
  • Alwine Mohnen

Abstract

This study employs an experimental approach to examine the impact of photographs in corporate sustainability reporting on readers' trust and environmental responsibility perceptions. Using a 3 × 2 between‐subject design, we manipulated context fit between photographs and report text (high‐ and low‐context photograph and text‐only) and reported performance (target not met and target met). Drawing on data from 313 participants, our somewhat counterintuitive findings suggest that using low‐context photographs, decoupled from the reporting text, largely backfires. Most notably, trust perceptions are lowest in the treatment when reporting on positive performance is supplemented with a low‐context photograph. Furthermore, we observe significant interaction effects between reported performance and choice of photographs. Hereby, we contribute novel experimental evidence to the literature, which has largely focused on discerning photographic messages. Our results have important implications for reporting managers, suggesting that low‐context photographs undermine how their sustainability progress is perceived.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenz Fenk & Alwine Mohnen, 2025. "The Power and Pitfalls of Photographs in Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Experimental Insights on Trust and Environmental Responsibility Perceptions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 7235-7253, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:7235-7253
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.70081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70081
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.70081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:7235-7253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.