IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jbecon/v94y2024i3d10.1007_s11573-023-01170-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clarifying ends in institutional decoupling theory: insights from social impact research

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Margaretha Jastram

    (Hamburg School of Business Administration)

  • Johanna Foersterling

    (Hamburg School of Business Administration)

Abstract

This paper addresses definitory vagueness regarding the term ‘ends’ in institutional decoupling theory, which can lead to validity problems, limited comparability of research results, and constrained theoretical findings. To clarify constructs, we inform the decoupling literature by integrating conceptual approaches from social impact research. On the basis of a systematic review of the social impact literature, we contribute two new conceptual models: an adjusted logic impact chain model and an integrated taxonomic model that differentiates two types of ‘ends’. By distinguishing between ‘ends as outcomes’ versus ‘ends as impacts’, we advance related discourses in institutional theory and build a more solid conceptual ground for empirical research and theory building in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Margaretha Jastram & Johanna Foersterling, 2024. "Clarifying ends in institutional decoupling theory: insights from social impact research," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 501-523, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jbecon:v:94:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11573-023-01170-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11573-023-01170-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11573-023-01170-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11573-023-01170-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Basak Kalkanci & Erica L. Plambeck, 2020. "Managing Supplier Social and Environmental Impacts with Voluntary Versus Mandatory Disclosure to Investors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3311-3328, August.
    2. Matthew Lee & Laura Huang, 2018. "Gender Bias, Social Impact Framing, and Evaluation of Entrepreneurial Ventures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Tommaso Palermo & Michael Power & Simon Ashby, 2017. "Navigating Institutional Complexity: The Production of Risk Culture in the Financial Sector," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 154-181, March.
    4. Elizabeth M. Moore & Luis Alfonso Dau & Jonathan Doh, 2020. "Does Monetary Aid Catalyse New Business Creation? Analysing the Impact of Global Aid Flows on Formal and Informal Entrepreneurship," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 438-469, May.
    5. Sadaat Ali Yawar & Stefan Seuring, 2017. "Management of Social Issues in Supply Chains: A Literature Review Exploring Social Issues, Actions and Performance Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 621-643, March.
    6. Maxim Voronov & Klaus Weber, 2020. "People, Actors, and the Humanizing of Institutional Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 873-884, June.
    7. Rob Tulder & M. May Seitanidi & Andrew Crane & Stephen Brammer, 2016. "Enhancing the Impact of Cross-Sector Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Bryan W. Husted & José De Jesus Salazar, 2006. "Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 75-91, January.
    9. Rui Albuquerque & Yrjö Koskinen & Chendi Zhang, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4451-4469, October.
    10. Dufour, Bryan, 2019. "Social impact measurement: What can impact investment practices and the policy evaluation paradigm learn from each other?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 18-30.
    11. Thomas P. Lyon & John W. Maxwell, 2011. "Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure under Threat of Audit," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 3-41, March.
    12. Linda Kelly & Patrick Kilby & Nalini Kasynathan, 2004. "Impact measurement for NGOs: experiences from India and Sri Lanka," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(5), pages 696-701.
    13. Corinne Post & Riikka Sarala & Caroline Gatrell & John E. Prescott, 2020. "Advancing Theory with Review Articles," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 351-376, March.
    14. Molecke, Greg & Pinkse, Jonatan, 2017. "Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 550-568.
    15. Mary M. Crossan & Marina Apaydin, 2010. "A Multi‐Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1154-1191, September.
    16. Jun Li & Di (Andrew) Wu, 2020. "Do Corporate Social Responsibility Engagements Lead to Real Environmental, Social, and Governance Impact?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(6), pages 2564-2588, June.
    17. Hans Rawhouser & Michael Cummings & Scott L. Newbert, 2019. "Social Impact Measurement: Current Approaches and Future Directions for Social Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 82-115, January.
    18. Anna Zamojska & Joanna Próchniak, 2017. "Measuring the Social Impact of Infrastructure Projects: The Case of Gdańsk International Fair Co," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 14(4), pages 25-42.
    19. Ulrich Mueckenberger & Sarah Jastram, 2010. "Transnational Norm-Building Networks and the Legitimacy of Corporate Social Responsibility Standards," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(2), pages 223-239, December.
    20. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2016. "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 193-221, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annebeth Roor & Karen Maas, 2024. "Do impact investors live up to their promise? A systematic literature review on (im)proving investments' impacts," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3707-3732, May.
    2. Guillaume Dumont, 2024. "Evaluating the Credibility of Entrepreneurs’ Impact Promises in Early-Stage Impact Investing," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(6), pages 1525-1555, November.
    3. Wry, Tyler & Haugh, Helen, 2018. "Brace for impact: Uniting our diverse voices through a social impact frame," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 566-574.
    4. Xiaoxuan Hou & Jiayi Yuan & Joel Z. Leibo & Natasha Jaques, 2024. "InvestESG: A multi-agent reinforcement learning benchmark for studying climate investment as a social dilemma," Papers 2411.09856, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    5. Portocarrero, Florencio & Newbert, Scott & Young, Maia & Zhu, Lily, 2025. "The affective revolution in entrepreneurship: an integrative conceptual review and guidelines for future investigation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126090, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Walid Ben‐Amar & Breeda Comyns & Isabelle Martinez, 2024. "Firm commitments on climate change: Effects of science‐based targets on financial outcomes during the COVID‐19 crisis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 7768-7787, December.
    7. Othmar Manfred Lehner & Alex Nicholls & Sarah Beatrice Kapplmüller, 2022. "Arenas of Contestation: A Senian Social Justice Perspective on the Nature of Materiality in Impact Measurement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 971-989, September.
    8. Singaram, Raja & Radu-Lefebvre, Miruna & Gartner, William B., 2023. "Gordian knot uncut: Understanding the problem of founder exit in social ventures," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    9. Li, Na & Li, Guo & Xue, Jing, 2025. "Does ESG protect firms equally during crises? The role of supply chain concentration," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    10. Pradeep Kumar Hota, 2023. "Tracing the Intellectual Evolution of Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Advances, Current Trends, and Future Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 637-659, January.
    11. Becchetti, Leonardo & Cucinelli, Doriana & Ielasi, Federica & Rossolini, Monica, 2023. "Corporate social irresponsibility: The relationship between ESG misconduct and the cost of equity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    12. Bok Baik & Omri Even‐Tov & Russell Han & David Park, 2024. "The Real Effects of Supply Chain Transparency Regulation: Evidence from Section 1502 of the Dodd–Frank Act," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 551-587, May.
    13. Christian C. Blanco, 2021. "Supply Chain Carbon Footprinting and Climate Change Disclosures of Global Firms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 3143-3160, September.
    14. Giannetti, Mariassunta & Jasova, Martina & Loumioti, Maria & Mendicino, Caterina, 2023. "“Glossy green” banks: the disconnect between environmental disclosures and lending activities," Working Paper Series 2882, European Central Bank.
    15. Faria, João Ricardo & Tindall, Greg & Terjesen, Siri, 2022. "The Green Tobin's q: theory and evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    16. James W. Westerman & Lubna Nafees & Jennifer Westerman, 2021. "Cultivating Support for the Sustainable Development Goals, Green Strategy and Human Resource Management Practices in Future Business Leaders: The Role of Individual Differences and Academic Training," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-9, June.
    17. Islam, Syrus M., 2020. "Towards an integrative definition of scaling social impact in social enterprises," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 13(C).
    18. Debbie Haski-Leventhal & Lonneke Roza & Lucas C. P. M. Meijs, 2017. "Congruence in Corporate Social Responsibility: Connecting the Identity and Behavior of Employers and Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 35-51, June.
    19. Lortie, Jason & Cox, Kevin C. & Roundy, Philip T., 2022. "Social impact models, legitimacy perceptions, and consumer responses to social ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 312-321.
    20. Ostertag, Felix & Hahn, Rüdiger & Ince, Inan, 2021. "Blended value co-creation: A qualitative investigation of relationship designs of social enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 428-445.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Institutional Theory; Social Impact; Decoupling; Systematic Literature Review;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jbecon:v:94:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11573-023-01170-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.