IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v37y2020i4p2186-2212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Forewarning Effect of Critical Audit Matter Disclosures Involving Measurement Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Steven J. Kachelmeier
  • Dan Rimkus
  • Jaime J. Schmidt
  • Kristen Valentine

Abstract

We present experimental evidence suggesting that critical audit matter (CAM) disclosures in the auditor's report involving areas of high measurement uncertainty forewarn users of misstatement risk. Specifically, in our first study with MBA students, financial analysts, and attorneys, we find that CAMs (i) lower premisstatement assessments of confidence in the financial statement area disclosed as a CAM, and (ii) lower assessments of auditor responsibility for a subsequently revealed misstatement in a CAM‐related area. In our second study with student participants proxying as mock jurors, we find that the responsibility‐mitigating effect of CAM disclosure is driven by CAM disclosures involving measurement uncertainty, as opposed to CAM disclosures involving categorical determinations. Combined, our findings help reconcile mixed evidence from prior research, supporting the view that the forewarning effect of CAM disclosures involving measurement uncertainty could mitigate perceived auditor responsibility for CAM‐related material misstatements. Valeur indicative de la communication de questions critiques de l'audit faisant intervenir l'incertitude relative à la mesure Les auteurs présentent des données expérimentales selon lesquelles la communication dans le rapport d'audit de questions critiques de l'audit (QCA) faisant intervenir des sections dans lesquelles l'incertitude relative à la mesure est élevée est, pour les utilisateurs, indicative d'un risque d'anomalie. Plus précisément, les résultats d'une première étude, menée auprès d'étudiants MBA, d'analystes financiers et d'avocats, amènent les auteurs à constater que les QCA 1) diminuent l'évaluation, préalable à l'anomalie, de la confiance dans la section des états financiers soulevant une QCA et 2) diminuent l'évaluation de la responsabilité de l'auditeur quant à une anomalie subséquemment mise au jour dans un domaine lié à la QCA. Les résultats d'une seconde étude auprès de participants étudiants jouant le rôle de jurés, mènent les auteurs à constater que l'effet atténuateur de responsabilité de la communication des QCA est attribuable au fait qu'elles se rapportent à une incertitude relative à la mesure plutôt qu'à des décisions de classement. Ces résultats conjugués contribuent à rapprocher les résultats divergents des recherches antérieures, ce qui confirme le point de vue selon lequel la valeur indicative de la communication de QCA faisant intervenir l'incertitude relative à la mesure pourrait atténuer la responsabilité perçue de l'auditeur en ce qui a trait aux anomalies significatives liées aux QCA.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven J. Kachelmeier & Dan Rimkus & Jaime J. Schmidt & Kristen Valentine, 2020. "The Forewarning Effect of Critical Audit Matter Disclosures Involving Measurement Uncertainty," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2186-2212, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:37:y:2020:i:4:p:2186-2212
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12583
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12583?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aronow, Peter M. & Baron, Jonathon & Pinson, Lauren, 2019. "A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects who Fail a Manipulation Check," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 572-589, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Qi & Zhang, Lin & Ma, Qianqun & Wu, Chong, 2024. "The impact of financial risk on boilerplate of key audit matters: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    2. Li, Valerie & Luo, Yan, 2023. "Costs and benefits of auditors' disclosure of critical audit matters: Initial evidence from the United States," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    3. Hien Hoang & Robyn Moroney & Soon‐Yeow Phang & Xinning Xiao, 2023. "Investor reactions to key audit matters: Financial and non‐financial contexts," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3325-3349, September.
    4. Duboisée de Ricquebourg, Alan & Maroun, Warren, 2023. "How do auditor rotations affect key audit matters? Archival evidence from South African audits," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    5. Clive S. Lennox & Jaime J. Schmidt & Anne M. Thompson, 2023. "Why are expanded audit reports not informative to investors? Evidence from the United Kingdom," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 497-532, June.
    6. Chambers, Valerie A. & Reckers, Philip M.J., 2022. "Auditor interventions that reduce auditor liability judgments," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. Ma, Jin & Coram, Paul & Troshani, Indrit, 2024. "The effect of key audit matters and management disclosures on auditors’ judgements and decisions: An exploratory study," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    8. Chen, Lihong & Xiao, Tingting & Zhou, Jia, 2023. "Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    9. Efrat Dressler & Yevgeny Mugerman, 2023. "Doing the Right Thing? The Voting Power Effect and Institutional Shareholder Voting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(4), pages 1089-1112, April.
    10. Maroun, Warren & Duboisée de Ricquebourg, Alan, 2024. "How auditors identify and report key audit matters - An organizational routines perspective," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    11. Elsayed, Mohamed & Elshandidy, Tamer & Ahmed, Yousry, 2023. "Is expanded auditor reporting meaningful? UK evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    12. Saeed Rabea Baatwah & Ehsan Saleh Almoataz & Khaled Salmen Aljaaidi, 2022. "Tightened it and ruined it: Earnings management trade-off as a consequence of key audit matters disclosure," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(2), pages 678-693.
    13. Song, Jie & Liang, Shangkun & Zhen, Yuhan, 2023. "Does CEO-auditor dialect sharing affect stock price crash risk? Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    14. Liu, Hui & Chang, Yufan & Zuo, Man, 2023. "Key audit matters and insider trading profitability: Evidence from China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
    15. Chan-Chuan Ting, 2023. "The Association Between Changes in Key Audit Matters and Earnings Management Behavior in Companies," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 13(6), pages 1-3.
    16. Yan Luo, 2021. "Determinants and consequence of critical audit matter disclosure: early evidence," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(4), pages 336-345, December.
    17. Ma, Qianqun & Zhou, Jianan & Wang, Qi & Wang, Kongwen, 2024. "The impact of key audit matters on goodwill accounting and investment behavior: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Devorah Manekin & Reed M. Wood, 2020. "Framing the Narrative: Female Fighters, External Audience Attitudes, and Transnational Support for Armed Rebellions," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(9), pages 1638-1665, October.
    2. Jimin Pyo & Michael G. Maxfield, 2021. "Cognitive Effects of Inattentive Responding in an MTurk Sample," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 2020-2039, July.
    3. Nicole Wu, 2023. "“Restrict foreigners, not robots”: Partisan responses to automation threat," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 505-528, July.
    4. Herkes, Feie J. & Zouridis, Stavros, 2023. "The legitimacy of land use decisions by public authorities in the Netherlands: Results from a survey experiment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    5. Lim, Sijeong & Dolsak, Nives & Prakash, Aseem & Tanaka, Seiki, 2022. "Distributional concerns and public opinion: EV subsidies in the U.S. and Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    6. Yang, Xisi & Thøgersen, John, 2022. "When people are green and greedy: A new perspective of recycling rewards and crowding-out in Germany, the USA and China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 217-235.
    7. Maxime Walder & Oliver Strijbis, 2022. "Negative Party Identification and the Use of Party Cues in the Direct Democratic Context," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 325-335.
    8. Elena Kantorowicz‐Reznichenko & Jarosław Kantorowicz & Keren Weinshall, 2022. "Ideological bias in constitutional judgments: Experimental analysis and potential solutions," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 716-757, September.
    9. Olbrich, Lukas & Sakshaug, Joseph W. & Lewandowski, Eric, 2024. "Evaluating methods to prevent and detect inattentive respondents in web surveys," SocArXiv py9gz, Center for Open Science.
    10. Azusa Uji & Sijeong Lim & Jaehyun Song, 2024. "From plastic to peace: Overcoming public antipathy through environmental cooperation," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(2), pages 279-293, March.
    11. Diament, Sean M. & Kaya, Ayse & Magenheim, Ellen B., 2022. "Frames that matter: Increasing the willingness to get the Covid-19 vaccines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    12. Kenneth J. Meier & Seung-ho An, 2020. "Sector bias in public programs: US nonprofit hospitals," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(1).
    13. Ariane Wenger & Michael Stauffacher & Irina Dallo, 2021. "Public perception and acceptance of negative emission technologies – framing effects in Switzerland," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Jaroslaw Kantorowicz, 2023. "Testing public reaction to constitutional fiscal rules violations," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 483-509, December.
    15. Daniel Silverman & Daniel Kent & Christopher Gelpi, 2022. "Putting Terror in Its Place: An Experiment on Mitigating Fears of Terrorism among the American Public," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(2), pages 191-216, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:37:y:2020:i:4:p:2186-2212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.