IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v96y2024ipcs1059056024006890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does reduced boilerplate of KAMs indicate increased audit effort? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Qianqun
  • Wang, Qi
  • Wang, Kongwen
  • Wu, Chong

Abstract

By examining the effects of media coverage and legal environment and the modifying effect of auditors' market shares, this paper investigates whether reduced boilerplate of key audit matters (KAMs) reflects increased audit effort. Our findings indicate that auditors can change boilerplate of KAMs according to the tone of media coverage: auditors may reduce boilerplate of KAMs when firms are exposed to more negative media coverage and may increase boilerplate of KAMs when firms are exposed to more positive media coverage. Auditors of firms that are exposed to weaker legal environment reduce boilerplate of KAMs. Boilerplate of KAMs disclosed by audit firms with larger market shares is more significantly influenced by negative media coverage and legal environment than those with smaller market shares. Additionally, the effects of media coverage and legal environment on boilerplate of KAMs are only significant for the sub-samples with non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs) and higher information symmetry. These results prove that reduced boilerplate of KAMs reflects increased audit effort.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Qianqun & Wang, Qi & Wang, Kongwen & Wu, Chong, 2024. "Does reduced boilerplate of KAMs indicate increased audit effort? Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PC).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:96:y:2024:i:pc:s1059056024006890
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024006890
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103697?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Skinner, Dj, 1994. "Why Firms Voluntarily Disclose Bad-News," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 38-60.
    2. repec:bla:jfinan:v:59:y:2004:i:2:p:537-600 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Weerapong Kitiwong & Naruanard Sarapaivanich, 2020. "Consequences of the implementation of expanded audit reports with key audit matters (KAMs) on audit quality," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(8), pages 1095-1119, July.
    4. Miguel Minutti-Meza, 2021. "The art of conversation: the expanded audit report," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(5), pages 548-581, July.
    5. Jean H. Bédard & Nathalie Gonthier-Besacier & Alain Schatt, 2019. "Consequences of Expanded Audit Reports : Evidence from the Justifications of Assessments in France," Post-Print hal-02011144, HAL.
    6. Elizabeth Gutierrez & Miguel Minutti-Meza & Kay W. Tatum & Maria Vulcheva, 2018. "Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the United Kingdom," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1543-1587, December.
    7. Gregory S. Miller, 2006. "The Press as a Watchdog for Accounting Fraud," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 1001-1033, December.
    8. Xixiong Xu & Wanli Li & Xichan Chen, 2019. "Confucian culture and stock price crash risk," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 25-61, January.
    9. repec:eme:maj000:maj-09-2019-2410 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. DeFond, Mark L. & Wong, T. J. & Li, Shuhua, 1999. "The impact of improved auditor independence on audit market concentration in China," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 269-305, December.
    11. Steven J. Kachelmeier & Dan Rimkus & Jaime J. Schmidt & Kristen Valentine, 2020. "The Forewarning Effect of Critical Audit Matter Disclosures Involving Measurement Uncertainty," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2186-2212, December.
    12. Robyn Moroney & Soon-Yeow Phang & Xinning Xiao, 2021. "When Do Investors Value Key Audit Matters?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 63-82, January.
    13. Mutchler, JF & Hopwood, W & McKeown, JM, 1997. "The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors on audit opinion decisions on bankrupt companies," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 295-310.
    14. Andreas Seebeck & Devrimi Kaya, 2023. "The Power of Words: An Empirical Analysis of the Communicative Value of Extended Auditor Reports," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 1185-1215, October.
    15. Ibrahim Bousmah & Gilles Grenier & David M. Gray, 2021. "Linguistic Distance, Languages of Work and Wages of Immigrants in Montreal," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 1-28, March.
    16. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor independence, `low balling', and disclosure regulation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 113-127, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Qi & Zhang, Lin & Ma, Qianqun & Wu, Chong, 2024. "The impact of financial risk on boilerplate of key audit matters: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    2. Ma, Qianqun & Zhou, Jianan & Wang, Qi & Wang, Kongwen, 2024. "The impact of key audit matters on goodwill accounting and investment behavior: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Duboisée de Ricquebourg, Alan & Maroun, Warren, 2023. "How do auditor rotations affect key audit matters? Archival evidence from South African audits," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    4. Ma, Jin & Coram, Paul & Troshani, Indrit, 2024. "The effect of key audit matters and management disclosures on auditors’ judgements and decisions: An exploratory study," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    5. Li, Valerie & Luo, Yan, 2023. "Costs and benefits of auditors' disclosure of critical audit matters: Initial evidence from the United States," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    6. Hosseinniakani, Mahmoud & Overland, Conny & Samani, Niuosha, 2024. "Do key audit matters matter? Correspondence between auditor and management disclosures and the role of audit committees," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    7. Elsayed, Mohamed & Elshandidy, Tamer & Ahmed, Yousry, 2023. "Is expanded auditor reporting meaningful? UK evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    8. Ahmed Aboud & Hany Elbardan & Moataz El-Helaly & Amr Kotb, 2024. "Does the audit committee member’s accounting experience associated with key audit matter types?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 753-780, August.
    9. Xu, Jingjing & Deng, Yingwen & Wen, Lin & Wang, Kuanliang, 2025. "Can auditing facilitate the effective implementation of goodwill accounting? A perspective based on key audit matters," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    10. Sau Yu Ong & Robyn Moroney & Xinning Xiao, 2022. "How do key audit matter characteristics combine to impact financial statement understandability?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 805-835, March.
    11. Kong, Dongmin & Ji, Mianmian & Liu, Shasha, 2022. "Does the mandatory disclosure of audit information affect analysts' information acquisition?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    12. María‐del‐Mar Camacho‐Miñano & Domenico Campa & Laura Parte, 2024. "Earnings management reactions to key audit matters," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S7), pages 115-130, November.
    13. Smith, Kecia Williams, 2023. "Tell Me More: A content analysis of expanded auditor reporting in the United Kingdom," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    14. Yan Luo, 2021. "Determinants and consequence of critical audit matter disclosure: early evidence," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(4), pages 336-345, December.
    15. Huang, Wenxuan & Xu, Weidong & Li, Donghui & (Duncan) Liu, Jiancheng, 2024. "Expanded auditor’s reports and voluntary disclosure," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3).
    16. Guo, Mengmeng & Su, Yun & Zhao, Rui, 2024. "The effect of expanded audit report on IPO underpricing: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    17. Li, Donghui & Xing, Lu & Zhao, Yang, 2022. "Does extended auditor disclosure deter managerial bad-news hoarding? Evidence from crash risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    18. Liu, Hui & Chang, Yufan & Zuo, Man, 2023. "Key audit matters and insider trading profitability: Evidence from China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
    19. Camacho-Miñano, María-del-Mar & Muñoz-Izquierdo, Nora & Pincus, Morton & Wellmeyer, Patricia, 2024. "Are key audit matter disclosures useful in assessing the financial distress level of a client firm?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    20. Kim, Jongkyum & Lim, Jee-Hae & Yoon, Kyunghee, 2022. "How do the content, format, and tone of Twitter-based corporate disclosure vary depending on earnings performance?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:96:y:2024:i:pc:s1059056024006890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.