IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-21-01053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tightened it and ruined it: Earnings management trade-off as a consequence of key audit matters disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Saeed Rabea Baatwah

    (Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia and Sieyun University, Yemen)

  • Ehsan Saleh Almoataz

    (Umm Al-Qura University)

  • Khaled Salmen Aljaaidi

    (Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz)

Abstract

Do changes in audit regulation disclosure always come with positive consequences? The paper studies the effect of expanding audit reporting by key audit matters on earnings management. Using a sample of 580 firm-year observations listed on the Omani stock market covering the period 2012–2019, the empirical results show that these new requirements make managers use more real earnings management and less use of accruals earnings management. Additional analyses provide evidence suggesting that key audit matters disclosure creates an atmosphere inducing managers to excessively substitute accruals earnings management by real earnings management. Thus, we conclude that new key audit matters requirement entails unintended negative consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeed Rabea Baatwah & Ehsan Saleh Almoataz & Khaled Salmen Aljaaidi, 2022. "Tightened it and ruined it: Earnings management trade-off as a consequence of key audit matters disclosure," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(2), pages 678-693.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-21-01053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2022/Volume42/EB-22-V42-I2-P57.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Key audit matters; critical audit matters; real earnings management; discretionary accruals; emerging market;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-21-01053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.