IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v64y2020i9p1638-1665.html

Framing the Narrative: Female Fighters, External Audience Attitudes, and Transnational Support for Armed Rebellions

Author

Listed:
  • Devorah Manekin
  • Reed M. Wood

Abstract

Female combatants play a central role in rebel efforts to cultivate and disseminate positive narratives regarding the movement and its political goals. Yet, the effectiveness of such strategies in shaping audience attitudes or generating tangible benefits for the group remains unclear. We propose and test a theory regarding the channels through which female fighters advance rebel goals. We argue that female fighters positively influence audience attitudes toward rebel groups by strengthening observers’ beliefs about their legitimacy and their decision to use armed tactics. We further contend that these effects directly help them secure support from transnational nonstate actors and indirectly promote state support. We assess our arguments by combining a novel survey experiment in two countries with analyses of new cross-national data on female combatants and information about transnational support for rebels. The empirical results support our arguments and demonstrate the impact of gender framing on rebel efforts to secure support.

Suggested Citation

  • Devorah Manekin & Reed M. Wood, 2020. "Framing the Narrative: Female Fighters, External Audience Attitudes, and Transnational Support for Armed Rebellions," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(9), pages 1638-1665, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:64:y:2020:i:9:p:1638-1665
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002720912823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002720912823
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002720912823?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aronow, Peter M. & Baron, Jonathon & Pinson, Lauren, 2019. "A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects who Fail a Manipulation Check," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 572-589, October.
    2. Jones, Benjamin T. & Mattiacci, Eleonora, 2019. "A Manifesto, in 140 Characters or Fewer: Social Media as a Tool of Rebel Diplomacy," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 739-761, April.
    3. Karim, Sabrina, 2019. "Restoring Confidence in Post-Conflict Security Sectors: Survey Evidence from Liberia on Female Ratio Balancing Reforms," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(3), pages 799-821, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marius Mehrl, 2023. "Female combatants and rebel group behaviour: Evidence from Nepal," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(3), pages 260-280, May.
    2. Lindsey A Goldberg, 2025. "International virtue signaling: How female combatants shape state support for armed rebellion," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(2), pages 107-130, March.
    3. Matthew Cebul & Jonathan Pinckney, 2025. "Nonviolent alternatives reduce external support for rebel groups: Evidence from two cross-national survey experiments," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(6), pages 1839-1856, November.
    4. Elizabeth L Brannon, 2025. "Labored legacies: The post-conflict implications of women’s wartime participation," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(6), pages 1629-1645, November.
    5. Reed M. Wood & Lindsey Allemang, 2022. "Female fighters and the fates of rebellions: How mobilizing women influences conflict duration," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(5), pages 565-586, September.
    6. Lindsey A Goldberg, 2025. "Women’s roles and reproductive violence within armed rebellions," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(6), pages 1611-1628, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Cebul & Jonathan Pinckney, 2025. "Nonviolent alternatives reduce external support for rebel groups: Evidence from two cross-national survey experiments," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(6), pages 1839-1856, November.
    2. Jimin Pyo & Michael G. Maxfield, 2021. "Cognitive Effects of Inattentive Responding in an MTurk Sample," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 2020-2039, July.
    3. Benjamin T Jones & Eleonora Mattiacci, 2023. "How foreign information campaigns shape US public pronouncements about civil wars," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 60(5), pages 839-852, September.
    4. Marius Mehrl, 2023. "Female combatants and rebel group behaviour: Evidence from Nepal," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(3), pages 260-280, May.
    5. Herkes, Feie J. & Zouridis, Stavros, 2023. "The legitimacy of land use decisions by public authorities in the Netherlands: Results from a survey experiment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Das, Abhijit & Chong, Vincent K. & Masschelein, Stijn & Wang, Isabel Z. & Woodliff, David R., 2025. "The effects of performance-based profit-sharing schemes and client pressure on auditors' pre-negotiation judgments," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Michal Smetana & Marek Vranka & Ondrej Rosendorf, 2023. "The lesser evil? Experimental evidence on the strength of nuclear and chemical weapon “taboosâ€," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(1), pages 3-21, January.
    8. Maxime Walder & Oliver Strijbis, 2022. "Negative Party Identification and the Use of Party Cues in the Direct Democratic Context," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 325-335.
    9. Olbrich, Lukas & Sakshaug, Joseph W. & Lewandowski, Eric, 2024. "Evaluating methods to prevent and detect inattentive respondents in web surveys," SocArXiv py9gz, Center for Open Science.
    10. Erik Lin-Greenberg & Theo Milonopoulos, 2021. "Private Eyes in the Sky: Emerging Technology and the Political Consequences of Eroding Government Secrecy," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(6), pages 1067-1097, July.
    11. Azusa Uji & Sijeong Lim & Jaehyun Song, 2024. "From plastic to peace: Overcoming public antipathy through environmental cooperation," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(2), pages 279-293, March.
    12. Jonathan H. Reed, 2025. "Duration matters: the interaction of the degree and the duration of environmental turbulence," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1029-1044, September.
    13. Diament, Sean M. & Kaya, Ayse & Magenheim, Ellen B., 2022. "Frames that matter: Increasing the willingness to get the Covid-19 vaccines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    14. Michael Faure & Jaroslaw Kantorowicz & Akiva Weiss, 2025. "Attribution and Migration: A Survey Experiment," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 2271-2292, December.
    15. Ariane Wenger & Michael Stauffacher & Irina Dallo, 2021. "Public perception and acceptance of negative emission technologies – framing effects in Switzerland," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Jaroslaw Kantorowicz, 2023. "Testing public reaction to constitutional fiscal rules violations," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 483-509, December.
    17. Steven J. Kachelmeier & Dan Rimkus & Jaime J. Schmidt & Kristen Valentine, 2020. "The Forewarning Effect of Critical Audit Matter Disclosures Involving Measurement Uncertainty," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2186-2212, December.
    18. Heinzel, Mirko & Weaver, Catherine & Jorgensen, Samantha, 2025. "Bureaucratic representation and gender mainstreaming in international organizations: evidence from the World Bank," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122464, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Nicole Wu, 2023. "“Restrict foreigners, not robots”: Partisan responses to automation threat," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 505-528, July.
    20. Lim, Sijeong & Dolsak, Nives & Prakash, Aseem & Tanaka, Seiki, 2022. "Distributional concerns and public opinion: EV subsidies in the U.S. and Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:64:y:2020:i:9:p:1638-1665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.