IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/compsc/v40y2023i1p3-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The lesser evil? Experimental evidence on the strength of nuclear and chemical weapon “taboosâ€

Author

Listed:
  • Michal Smetana

    (Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Czech Republic)

  • Marek Vranka

    (Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Czech Republic)

  • Ondrej Rosendorf

    (Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Czech Republic)

Abstract

We present findings of a survey experiment on a sample of 2350 American and British citizens, in which we examined attitudes towards nuclear and chemical strikes. Our findings demonstrate that even though the public accurately judges nuclear weapons as more destructive and indiscriminate, it is still more averse to the use of chemical than nuclear weapons. Our follow up study has shown that individuals are significantly more likely to associate chemical weapons with “rogue states†and terrorists, and associate nuclear weapons with modern powers. The findings contribute to scholarship on the “taboos†surrounding the (non-)use of WMDs in world politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Michal Smetana & Marek Vranka & Ondrej Rosendorf, 2023. "The lesser evil? Experimental evidence on the strength of nuclear and chemical weapon “taboosâ€," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(1), pages 3-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:40:y:2023:i:1:p:3-21
    DOI: 10.1177/07388942221124515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07388942221124515
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/07388942221124515?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:40:y:2023:i:1:p:3-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.