IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v32y2023i4p1452-1469.html

Towards theorising corporate social irresponsibility: The Déjà Vu cases of collapsed forestry ventures

Author

Listed:
  • Tiffany C. H. Leung
  • Artie W. Ng
  • Andreas G. F. Hoepner
  • Maretno A. Harjoto

Abstract

Based on case studies and secondary data, this study theorises how and why firms engage in corporate social irresponsibility (CSIR). Using the inductive process of theory building based on case studies of two forestry companies operating in China, this study explains how and why organisations with initial intentions towards corporate social responsibility (CSR) engage in CSIR based on paths taken and the behaviours across micro (individual), meso (organisational), and macro (industry) levels. Hence, there is a ‘grey zone’ between CSR and CSIR (Clark, C. E., Riera, M., & Iborra, M. (2021). Business & Society, 61, 1473–1511. 10.1177/00076503211015911). This study extends the path dependence literature on CSIR (Küberling‐Jost, J.A. (2019). Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3), 579–601) by integrating moral disengagement and the theory of planned behaviour, stakeholder agency, and institutional theory into path dependence theory based on observed behaviours across micro, meso, and macro levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiffany C. H. Leung & Artie W. Ng & Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Maretno A. Harjoto, 2023. "Towards theorising corporate social irresponsibility: The Déjà Vu cases of collapsed forestry ventures," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 1452-1469, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:32:y:2023:i:4:p:1452-1469
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12551
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Yangyang & Gul, Ferdinand A. & Truong, Cameron & Veeraraghavan, Madhu, 2016. "Auditor client specific knowledge and internal control weakness: Some evidence on the role of auditor tenure and geographic distance," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 121-140.
    2. Harjoto, Maretno A. & Hoepner, Andreas G.F. & Li, Qian, 2022. "A stakeholder resource-based view of corporate social irresponsibility: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 830-843.
    3. Vanessa M Strike & Jijun Gao & Pratima Bansal, 2006. "Being good while being bad: social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 37(6), pages 850-862, November.
    4. Gillespie, Nicole & Dietz, Graham & Lockey, Steve, 2014. "Organizational Reintegration and Trust Repair after an Integrity Violation: A Case Study," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 371-410, July.
    5. Isabell Lenz & Hauke A. Wetzel & Maik Hammerschmidt, 2017. "Can doing good lead to doing poorly? Firm value implications of CSR in the face of CSI," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 677-697, September.
    6. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 2008. "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 48(2), April.
    7. Karpoff, Jonathan M. & Lee, D. Scott & Martin, Gerald S., 2008. "The Cost to Firms of Cooking the Books," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 581-611, September.
    8. Price, Joseph M. & Sun, Wenbin, 2017. "Doing good and doing bad: The impact of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility on firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 82-97.
    9. Brian Jones & Ryan Bowd & Ralph Tench, 2009. "Corporate irresponsibility and corporate social responsibility: competing realities," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(3), pages 300-310, July.
    10. Craig Pearce & Charles Manz, 2011. "Leadership Centrality and Corporate Social Ir-Responsibility (CSIR): The Potential Ameliorating Effects of Self and Shared Leadership on CSIR," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(4), pages 563-579, September.
    11. Harjoto, Maretno A. & Hoepner, Andreas G.F. & Li, Qian, 2021. "Corporate social irresponsibility and portfolio performance: A cross-national study," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Stefanie Habersang & Jill Küberling‐Jost & Markus Reihlen & Christoph Seckler, 2019. "A Process Perspective on Organizational Failure: A Qualitative Meta‐Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 19-56, January.
    13. Rashid Zaman & Nader Atawnah & Muhammad Nadeem & Stephen Bahadar & Irfan Haider Shakri, 2022. "Do liquid assets lure managers? Evidence from corporate misconduct," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(7-8), pages 1425-1453, July.
    14. Windsor, Duane, 2013. "Corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility: A positive theory approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1937-1944.
    15. Celia Moore, 2008. "Moral Disengagement in Processes of Organizational Corruption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 129-139, June.
    16. Armstrong, J. Scott, 1977. "Social irresponsibility in management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 185-213, September.
    17. Charles W. L. Hill & Thomas M. Jones, 1992. "Stakeholder‐Agency Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 131-154, March.
    18. Siri Carson & Øivind Hagen & S. Sethi, 2015. "From Implicit to Explicit CSR in a Scandinavian Context: The Cases of HÅG and Hydro," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 17-31, March.
    19. Marta Riera & María Iborra, 2017. "Corporate social irresponsibility: review and conceptual boundaries," European Journal of Management and Business Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(2), pages 146-162, July.
    20. Brian Jones & Ryan Bowd & Ralph Tench, 2009. "Corporate irresponsibility and corporate social responsibility: competing realities," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(3), pages 300-310, July.
    21. Pisani, Niccolò & Kourula, Arno & Kolk, Ans & Meijer, Renske, 2017. "How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 591-614.
    22. Herzig, Christian & Moon, Jeremy, 2013. "Discourses on corporate social ir/responsibility in the financial sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1870-1880.
    23. Julian F. Kölbel & Timo Busch & Leonhardt M. Jancso, 2017. "How Media Coverage of Corporate Social Irresponsibility Increases Financial Risk," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 2266-2284, November.
    24. Nadia Smaili & Paulina Arroyo & Faridath Antoinette Issa, 2021. "The dark side of blockholder control: evidence from financial statement fraud cases," Journal of Financial Crime, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(3), pages 816-835, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Iborra & Marta Riera, 2023. "Corporate social irresponsibility: What we know and what we need to know," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1421-1439, May.
    2. Maria Roszkowska‐Menkes, 2025. "ESG pay and corporate social irresponsibility: Does culture matter?," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1860-1885, October.
    3. Anita Mendiratta & Shveta Singh & Surendra Singh Yadav & Arvind Mahajan, 2023. "Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Analysis of Corporate Social Irresponsibility," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 319-339, September.
    4. Yue, Cen April & Tao, Weiting & Ferguson, Mary Ann, 2023. "The joint effect of corporate social irresponsibility and social responsibility on consumer outcomes," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 744-754.
    5. Gema C. Fleitas‐Castillo & Devora Peña‐Martel & Jerónimo Pérez‐Alemán & Domingo Javier Santana‐Martín, 2024. "Board gender diversity and corporate social irresponsibility in a dominant owner context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5122-5138, November.
    6. Harjoto, Maretno A. & Hoepner, Andreas G.F. & Li, Qian, 2022. "A stakeholder resource-based view of corporate social irresponsibility: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 830-843.
    7. Rafael Alcadipani & Cíntia Rodrigues Oliveira Medeiros, 2020. "When Corporations Cause Harm: A Critical View of Corporate Social Irresponsibility and Corporate Crimes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 285-297, November.
    8. Rezaee, Zabihollah & Zhou, Gaoguang & Bu, Luofan (Luther), 2024. "Corporate social irresponsibility and the occurrence of data breaches: A stakeholder management perspective," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    9. Cemil Kuzey & Habiba Al-Shaer & Ali Uyar & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2024. "Do board monitoring and audit committee quality help risky firms reduce CSR controversies?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1007-1045, October.
    10. Pascal Nguyen & Nahid Rahman & Ruoyun Zhao, 2024. "Do firms adjust their payout policy to public perception of their social irresponsibility ?," Post-Print hal-05075880, HAL.
    11. Jill A. Küberling-Jost, 2021. "Paths of Corporate Irresponsibility: A Dynamic Process," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 579-601, March.
    12. Majumdarr, Shubh & Jindal, Abhinav & Pandey, Jayesh, 2025. "Spilling the beans of recent oil spills in Latin America and Africa: A multi-case study analysis of corporate social irresponsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    13. Xiaoyang Zhao & Jie Mi, 2024. "Firms’ corporate social irresponsibility behaviors during interplay with consumers in evolutionary game models," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Rajiv Kashyap & Mohamed Menisy & Peter Caiazzo & Jim Samuel, 2020. "Transparency versus Performance in Financial Markets: The Role of CSR Communications," Papers 2008.03443, arXiv.org.
    15. Maretno A. Harjoto & Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Marcus A. Nilsson, 2022. "Bondholders’ returns and stakeholders’ interests," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1271-1301, November.
    16. Lin-Hi, Nick & Müller, Karsten, 2013. "The CSR bottom line: Preventing corporate social irresponsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1928-1936.
    17. Hong Zhang & Lei Zhang, 2025. "Dual Social Responsibility: The Pathway Effects and Mechanisms of Benevolent and Malevolent Actions on Firm Performance," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 2056-2074, October.
    18. Price, Joseph M. & Sun, Wenbin, 2017. "Doing good and doing bad: The impact of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility on firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 82-97.
    19. Hyun, Soonchul & Kim, Jong Min & Liu, Ying, 2023. "Equal gains and pains? Analyzing corporate financial performance for industrial corporate social performance leaders and laggards," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    20. Federica Nieri & Luciano Ciravegna, 2019. "Investigating firms' involvement in corporate social irresponsibility: Are family owned MNEs better corporate citizens?," Discussion Papers 2019/254, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:32:y:2023:i:4:p:1452-1469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.