IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v18y2024i1p2719-2732n1041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing Innovation through Bibliometrics: A Comparative Study of Sustainable Practices in Leading Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Ionascu Alina

    (West University of Timisoara, Doctoral School of Economics and Business Administration, Timisoara, Romania)

  • Noja Gratiela Georgiana

    (West University of Timisoara, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

This research is initiated by analyzing the post-pandemic period through digitalization and economic growth. In this research, we reopened the topics such as digitalization, sustainable development, and innovation. This research has also brought new sustainable development horizons, particularly in Europe. We are investigating the significance of innovation and research in pursuing sustainable development and digitalization in the social impact of economic innovations. It also examines specific innovative solutions that have positively impacted sustainable development. It marks a new phase with a gradual shift towards a retrospective analysis of COVID-19. For example, Switzerland has implemented a comprehensive recycling program. Federal measures to promote the circular economy are based on the principles of precaution and “polluter pays”, technological progress and innovation, and cooperation with industry under the Law on environmental protection. Sweden has pioneered renewable energy solutions; the country boasts seven municipalities that are 98% fossil-free. The UK has introduced innovative financial instruments to support green investments. This phase assessed how economic recovery and sustainability initiatives were influenced in these nations, considering their advanced level of innovation and ability to implement innovative solutions to post-pandemic challenges. This interest is demonstrated through increased resource allocation and support for initiatives that foster technological progress and sustainability, indicating a clear trend toward integrating innovative solutions into economic strategies. It delves into how these countries have balanced and incorporated these elements in the aftermath of the pandemic, highlighting specific strategies and outcomes in each case of countries. This research, bolstered by bibliometric analysis, underscores the importance of innovation in navigating the complexity of post-pandemic economic recovery and sustainability and compares leading nations. This research thoroughly delves into how countries have balanced and incorporated various elements in the aftermath of the pandemic. It meticulously highlights specific strategies and outcomes in each case, using bibliometric analysis to emphasize the importance of innovation in navigating post-pandemic economic recovery and sustainability. It compares the approaches and achievements of leading nations, providing insights into how innovation has driven their progress during this challenging period. This research looks at the effects of regional crises, such as the European debt post-pandemic destabilization, on economic environments through digitalization and the sustainable economy. For instance, the pandemic led to a significant decline in tourism revenue in Switzerland, a disruption in global supply chains for Sweden, and a decrease in foreign direct investment in the United Kingdom. Thus, following these goals, many beneficial reforms emerged. Our exploration into how innovation and research drive sustainable development and impact society through economic advancements is an ongoing journey. By analyzing the innovation indicator (GII 2023), this study highlights the critical importance of blending innovative research with economic policies to boost resilience and adaptability as the world shifts to a post-pandemic reality. This study spotlights the social dimensions of financial innovation and explores how sustainable practices can help alleviate unemployment, inequality, and other socioeconomic gaps while fostering a circular economic culture. It delves into how these practices foster a circular economy mindset and provide practical frameworks for sustainable economic development growth in a post-pandemic world.

Suggested Citation

  • Ionascu Alina & Noja Gratiela Georgiana, 2024. "Analyzing Innovation through Bibliometrics: A Comparative Study of Sustainable Practices in Leading Economies," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 2719-2732.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:2719-2732:n:1041
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2024-0227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2024-0227
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2024-0227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Georg Scherer & Christian Voegtlin, 2020. "Corporate Governance for Responsible Innovation: Approaches to Corporate Governance and Their Implications for Sustainable Development," Post-Print hal-02623585, HAL.
    2. Inmaculada Bel-Oms & José Ramón Segarra-Moliner, 2022. "How Do Remuneration Committees Affect Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure? Empirical Evidence from an International Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Noja Graţiela & Pânzaru Ciprian, 2021. "Five Possible impacts of Digitalisation in Romania," European Review of Applied Sociology, Sciendo, vol. 14(22), pages 1-10, June.
    4. Valentina Cattivelli & Vincenzo Rusciano, 2020. "Social Innovation and Food Provisioning during Covid-19: The Case of Urban–Rural Initiatives in the Province of Naples," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Huasheng Gao & Jun Huang & Tianshu Zhang, 2020. "Can online annual general meetings increase shareholders’ participation in corporate governance?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 49(4), pages 1029-1050, December.
    6. Sophie A Shive & Margaret M Forster & Jose Scheinkman, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Pollution Externalities of Public and Private Firms," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(3), pages 1296-1330.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zoltán Csedő & József Magyari & Máté Zavarkó, 2022. "Dynamic Corporate Governance, Innovation, and Sustainability: Post-COVID Period," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Rezvan Pourmansouri & Amir Mehdiabadi & Vahid Shahabi & Cristi Spulbar & Ramona Birau, 2022. "An Investigation of the Link between Major Shareholders’ Behavior and Corporate Governance Performance before and after the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of the Companies Listed on the Iranian Stock," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-30, April.
    3. Tina C. Ambos & Katherine Tatarinov, 2022. "Building Responsible Innovation in International Organizations through Intrapreneurship," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 92-125, January.
    4. Martinsson, Gustav & Sajtos, László & Strömberg, Per & Thomann, Christian, 2022. "Carbon Pricing and Firm-Level CO2 Abatement: Evidence from a Quarter of a Century-Long Panel," Misum Working Paper Series 2022-10, Stockholm School of Economics, Mistra Center for Sustainable Markets (Misum).
    5. Wang, Qiong & Qiu, Muqing, 2023. "Strength in numbers: Minority shareholders' participation and executives' pay-performance sensitivity," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Ge Zhang & Yuxiang Gao & Gaoyong Li, 2023. "Research on Digital Transformation and Green Technology Innovation—Evidence from China’s Listed Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Tachia Chin & Francesco Caputo & Yi Shi & Mario Calabrese & Chiraz Aouina‐Mejri & Armando Papa, 2022. "Depicting the role of cross‐cultural legitimacy for responsible innovation in Asian‐Pacific business models: A dialectical systems view of Yin‐Yang harmony," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 2083-2093, November.
    8. Kakuho Furukawa & Hibiki Ichiue & Noriyuki Shiraki, 2020. "How Does Climate Change Interact with the Financial System? A Survey," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 20-E-8, Bank of Japan.
    9. Khalid Rasheed Memon & Say Keat Ooi & Heesup Han, 2024. "Responsible innovation and corporate sustainability performance: A structural equation modeling‐neural network approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2712-2730, May.
    10. Reddy, A. Amarender & Bhattacharya, Anindita & Reddy, S. Venku & Ricart, Sandra, 2021. "Farmers’ Distress Index: An Approach for an Action Plan to Reduce Vulnerability in the Drylands of India," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(11), pages 1-1.
    11. Li, Yi & Zhang, Wei & Wang, Pengfei, 2021. "Working online or offline: Which is more effective?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    12. Serdar Aydın & Betina Assumpta Nakiyingi & Cengiz Esmen & Sinan Güneysu & Meena Ejjada, 2021. "Environmental impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) from Turkish perceptive," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7573-7580, May.
    13. Sophie Bacq & Ruth V. Aguilera, 2022. "Stakeholder Governance for Responsible Innovation: A Theory of Value Creation, Appropriation, and Distribution," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 29-60, January.
    14. Salil K. Sen, 2020. "Decovidization through Rurbanization: The Re-development Option for Sustainable Energy Access," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 515-523.
    15. Zhiliang Xu & Changxin Xu & Yun Li, 2023. "Green Credit Policy, Environmental Investment, and Green Innovation: Quasi-Natural Experimental Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Principato, Ludovica & Secondi, Luca & Cicatiello, Clara & Mattia, Giovanni, 2022. "Caring more about food: The unexpected positive effect of the Covid-19 lockdown on household food management and waste," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    17. Chaohui Xu & Xingtong Chen & Wei Dai, 2022. "Effects of Digital Transformation on Environmental Governance of Mining Enterprises: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Shiu-Yik Au & Ming Dong & Andréanne Tremblay, 2024. "How Much Does Workplace Sexual Harassment Hurt Firm Value?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(4), pages 861-883, April.
    19. Chien, FengSheng & Paramaiah, Ch & joseph, Robinson & Pham, Hong Chuong & Phan, Thi Thu Hien & Ngo, Thanh Quang, 2023. "The impact of eco-innovation, trade openness, financial development, green energy and government governance on sustainable development in ASEAN countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 259-268.
    20. Cattivelli, Valentina, 2022. "The contribution of urban garden cultivation to food self-sufficiency in areas at risk of food desertification during the Covid-19 pandemic," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:2719-2732:n:1041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.