IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/joinma/v17y2025i3p5-30n1001.html

Understanding Digital Organizational Trust: A Socio-Technical Approach to Human-Technology Collaboration

Author

Listed:
  • Kożuch Barbara

    (SAN University, Poland)

  • Fijałkowska Justyna

    (SAN University, Poland)

Abstract

Objective The aim of this article is to conceptualize organizational digital trust in the context of emerging technological paradigms such as Industry 5.0, Society 5.0, and Actor–Network Theory (ANT). The study seeks to identify the key dimensions, mechanisms, and implications of digital trust in contemporary organizations, highlighting its socio -technical character and strategic relevance. Methodology The article adopts a conceptual and theoretical approach based on an extensive literature review, including foundational models of trust (e.g., Mayer et al., 1995) and recent contributions in digital transformation research. Actor–Network Theory (Latour, 1996; Cressman, 2009) is employed as a lens for analyzing trust as a relational outcome among heterogeneous actants – technologies, users, and organizational environments. Findings The study reveals that digital trust is a multi -dimensional construct shaped by both human and technological factors. It encompasses ethical organizational values, compliance with digital standards, and the interplay between user and technology trustworthiness. Three proposed models illustrate different levels of digital trust formation, including trust between actants and human--technology collaboration. Digital trust is shown to function as both a precondition and a product of organizational cooperation, with direct implications for performance and innovation. Value Added This article contributes to the growing discourse on digital trust by offering an integrative framework rooted in both classical trust theory and ANT. It underscores the need to consider digital trust as a dynamic organizational asset, shaped by interactions between people, technologies, and institutional environments. The study also highlights areas for future empirical validation, addressing the current gap between theoretical elaboration and practical assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Kożuch Barbara & Fijałkowska Justyna, 2025. "Understanding Digital Organizational Trust: A Socio-Technical Approach to Human-Technology Collaboration," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 17(3), pages 5-30.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:joinma:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:5-30:n:1001
    DOI: 10.2478/joim-2025-0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2025-0009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/joim-2025-0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gefen, David, 2000. "E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 725-737, December.
    2. Ahmed Tlili & Ronghuai Huang & Kinshuk, 2023. "Metaverse for climbing the ladder toward ‘Industry 5.0’ and ‘Society 5.0’?," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3-4), pages 260-287, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & T. Ramayah & Nalini Suppiah & Osama Alfarraj & Nasser Alalwan, 2020. "Modeling Blog Usage From a Developing Country Perspective Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    2. Dumpe Maira, 2015. "Online Marketing Issues of Real Estate Companies: A Case of Latvia," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 3(1), pages 130-139, December.
    3. Vlad Rosca, 2015. "Customer attitudes towards buying e-books: Perspectives from a Romanian publishing house," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 4, pages 105-111.
    4. Maik Hesse & Timm Teubner & Marc T. P. Adam, 2022. "In Stars We Trust – A Note on Reputation Portability Between Digital Platforms," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(3), pages 349-358, June.
    5. Chetan A. Jhaveri & Jitendra M. Nenavani, 2020. "Evaluation of eTail Services Quality: AHP Approach," Vision, , vol. 24(3), pages 310-319, September.
    6. Qin, Li & De-Juan-Vigaray, María D., 2021. "Social commerce: Is interpersonal trust formation similar between U.S.A. and Spain?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    7. Möhlmann, Mareike, 2021. "Unjustified trust beliefs: Trust conflation on sharing economy platforms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(3).
    8. Al-Adwan, Ahmad Samed & Al-Debei, Mutaz M. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2022. "E-commerce in high uncertainty avoidance cultures: The driving forces of repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Ratilla, Mark & Salgado, Stéphane & Cavite, Harry Jay & Dey, Sandeep, 2025. "Peer-provider participation in the sharing economy: The moderating role of warm glow emotion and underlying motivations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4215 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Leonie Kuen & Fiona Schürmann & Daniel Westmattelmann & Sophie Hartwig & Shay Tzafrir & Gerhard Schewe, 2023. "Trust transfer effects and associated risks in telemedicine adoption," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    12. El Aissoug, Chaimaa & Kim, Thai-Young & Wang, Xue-Qin & Choi, Dong-Hyun, 2024. "Cross-cultural exploration of determinants of e-commerce adoption: Perspectives from logistics service quality and payment driver," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Geetu Tuteja & Shashank Gupta & Vaishali Garg, 2016. "Consumer Trust in Internet Shopping," Paradigm, , vol. 20(2), pages 191-215, December.
    14. Ajao Qasim & Emad Abu-Shanab, 2016. "Drivers of mobile payment acceptance: The impact of network externalities," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 1021-1034, October.
    15. Timm Teubner & Marc T. P. Adam & Florian Hawlitschek, 2020. "Unlocking Online Reputation," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(6), pages 501-513, December.
    16. Nafise Mohammadi Shakiba & Mohammad-Ali Doostari & Mostafa Mohammadpourfard, 2017. "ESIV: an end-to-end secure internet voting system," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 463-494, September.
    17. Juan F. Tavera Mesías & Juan C. S�nchez Giraldo & Bernardo Ballesteros D�az, 2011. "Aceptación del E-Commerce en Colombia: un estudio para la ciudad de Medellín," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada.
    18. Basharat Ali & Nazim Baluch & Zulkifli Mohamed Udin, 2015. "The Moderating Effect of Religiosity on the Relationship between Trust and Diffusion of Electronic Commerce," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(13), pages 176-176, December.
    19. Lucia-Palacios, Laura & Pérez-López, Raúl, 2021. "Effects of Home Voice Assistants' Autonomy on Instrusiveness and Usefulness: Direct, Indirect, and Moderating Effects of Interactivity," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 41-54.
    20. Yousaf, Anish & Mishra, Abhishek & Gupta, Anil, 2021. "‘From technology adoption to consumption’: Effect of pre-adoption expectations from fitness applications on usage satisfaction, continual usage, and health satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    21. Matej Kovač & Vesna Žabkar, 2020. "Do Social Media and E-Mail Engagement Impact Reputation and Trust-Driven Behavior?," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 32(1), pages 9-25.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:joinma:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:5-30:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.