IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/foeste/v25y2025i2p138-158n1007.html

Use of the Topsis Method in Consumers’ Luxury Electric Vehicle Purchasing Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • İnan Ümmü Saliha Eken

    (Selcuk University, Türkiye)

Abstract

Research background The increasing variety of electric vehicles affects users’ electric vehicle purchasing pReferences. Purpose The aim of this study is to determine the importance levels of the factors that affect consumer decisions in purchasing electric vehicles whose prices are above a certain lower limit and to rank the vehicles with the highest score. Research methodology TOPSIS Method, one of the multi-criteria decision-making methods, was used in the study. In the study, six different selection criteria were determined: Range (km), Charging time (min), Price (euro), Acceleration (0–100 km/h acceleration), Torque (Nm), and Power (hp). These data were obtained from the information shared by the brands on their websites, using secondary data sources. User selection was achieved by determining a lower level in the price criterion in brand and model elimination. In the implementation of the study, vehicles with a lower price limit of over 5 million lira were taken into consideration. Four different brands that meet these criteria and are currently on sale in the Türkiye market have been identified. The models evaluated among these brands are the Mercedes EQS, Porsche Taycan, BMW iX, BMW i7, and Audi E-Tron. Results In the selection made using the TOPSIS Method, the Mercedes EQS is in the first place in the automobile ranking, BMW iX is in the second place, BMW i7 is in the third place, Audi E-Tron is in the fourth place and Porsche Taycan is in the last place. Novelty The difference of this study from other studies is that luxury electric vehicles are included in the sample for the first time. In addition, charging times, torque and acceleration values have only been included in studies recently. Because in previous studies, criteria such as price, range and power were studied with different models and different classes of vehicles.

Suggested Citation

  • İnan Ümmü Saliha Eken, 2025. "Use of the Topsis Method in Consumers’ Luxury Electric Vehicle Purchasing Decisions," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 138-158.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:foeste:v:25:y:2025:i:2:p:138-158:n:1007
    DOI: 10.2478/foli-2025-0026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2025-0026
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/foli-2025-0026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dwivedi, Pankaj Prasad & Sharma, Dilip Kumar, 2023. "Evaluation and ranking of battery electric vehicles by Shannon’s entropy and TOPSIS methods," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 457-474.
    2. Paweł Ziemba, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Stochastic Selection of Electric Vehicles for the Sustainable Development of Local Government and State Administration Units in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei, Sen & Yang, Hanqing & Bai, Yu & Wang, Yuanqing, 2025. "Road safety assessment of small management units considering smart roadway retrofitting," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 28-41.
    2. Irina Vinogradova-Zinkevič, 2021. "Application of Bayesian Approach to Reduce the Uncertainty in Expert Judgments by Using a Posteriori Mean Function," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Yossi Hadad & Baruch Keren & Dima Alberg, 2023. "An Expert System for Ranking and Matching Electric Vehicles to Customer Specifications and Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Katarzyna Turoń & Andrzej Kubik & Feng Chen, 2022. "What Car for Car-Sharing? Conventional, Electric, Hybrid or Hydrogen Fleet? Analysis of the Vehicle Selection Criteria for Car-Sharing Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Paweł Ziemba & Mateusz Piwowarski & Kesra Nermend, 2023. "Remote Work in Post-Pandemic Reality—Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Teleconferencing Software," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Karczmarczyk, Artur & Wątróbski, Jarosław & Bączkiewicz, Aleksandra & Mróz-Malik, Oliwia & Drożdż, Wojciech, 2025. "New robust multi-criteria decision-making method for wind farm location problems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 398(C).
    7. Ziemba, Paweł, 2022. "Uncertain Multi-Criteria analysis of offshore wind farms projects investments – Case study of the Polish Economic Zone of the Baltic Sea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    8. Albert Y. S. Lam & Bogusław Łazarz & Grzegorz Peruń, 2022. "Smart Energy and Intelligent Transportation Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-3, April.
    9. Niki Derlukiewicz & Anna Mempel-Śnieżyk & Tomasz Pilewicz & Małgorzata Godlewska, 2021. "Bottom-Up Initiatives Undertaken by Local Governments to Support Entrepreneurship," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Katarzyna Turoń, 2022. "Carsharing Vehicle Fleet Selection from the Frequent User’s Point of View," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Paweł Ziemba & Izabela Gago, 2022. "Compromise Multi-Criteria Selection of E-Scooters for the Vehicle Sharing System in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    12. Paweł Ziemba & Aneta Becker & Jarosław Becker, 2021. "Forecasting and Assessment of the Energy Security Risk in Fuzzy Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Wei, Sen & Li, Yanping & Yang, Hanqing & Xie, Minghui & Wang, Yuanqing, 2023. "A comprehensive operation and maintenance assessment for intelligent highways: A case study in Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao bridge," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 84-98.
    14. Jaros{l}aw Wk{a}tr'obski & Aleksandra Bk{a}czkiewicz & Iga Rudawska, 2023. "A Strong Sustainability Paradigm Based Analytical Hierarchy Process (SSP-AHP) Method to Evaluate Sustainable Healthcare Systems," Papers 2306.00718, arXiv.org.
    15. Dwivedi, Pankaj Prasad & Sharma, Dilip Kumar, 2025. "Quantitative assessment of photovoltaic thermal collectors to enhance energy efficiency in the power system by SWEI MCDM method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    16. Paweł Ziemba, 2021. "Selection of Electric Vehicles for the Needs of Sustainable Transport under Conditions of Uncertainty—A Comparative Study on Fuzzy MCDA Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-25, November.
    17. Paweł Ziemba, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Fuzzy Evaluation of the Planned Offshore Wind Farm Investments in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Yunfei Zhang & Gaili Xu, 2025. "A Possible Degree-Based D–S Evidence Theory Method for Ranking New Energy Vehicles Based on Online Customer Reviews and Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-29, February.
    19. Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2021. "Comparative Multicriteria Analysis Methods for Ranking Sites for Solar Farm Deployment: A Case Study in Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Maiquiel Schmidt de Oliveira & Flavio Trojan & Vilmar Steffen, 2025. "Model for Definition of Multi-Criteria Compensation by the ICCI (Inter-Criteria Compensation Index) in the Ranking of Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
    • M30 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - General
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M39 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:foeste:v:25:y:2025:i:2:p:138-158:n:1007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://reference-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.