IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ura/ecregj/v1y2015i3p279-294.html

Territorial Innovative Potential in Behavioral Assessments of the Population

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandr Tatarkin

    (Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences - Ural Branch)

  • Ksenia Novikova

    (Institute of economics of the Ural branch of RAS)

Abstract

In the article, the essential and formalized definition of the potential of the territory is proved; its innovative part in the “subjectprocess-object†approach to its essential content and impact assessment is determined. The system of mechanisms and institutes of building the regional and territorial innovative potential is elaborated, the most productive directions of its using in the interests of spatial socio-economic development are allocated. Problems of high priority and requiring solutions that are able to increase the effectiveness of territory functioning are identified. The mentioned problems found their reflection and possible solutions at the Gaidar International Economic Forum in Moscow (2015) and at the representative XII Krasnoyarsk Economic Forum, as reflected by the analyses of some forum’s speeches presented in the paper. The shift of priorities in innovative global development during the second part of the 20th century and at the beginning of the 21st century is shown. The results of research and practice of utilizing innovative solutions for the development of some collectives and territories, the spatial structure of regions and the Russian Federation as a whole are investigated and generalized in this paper. The development of the territory and its potential depends on different factors, but the growth of knowledge, intellectual resource and involvement of the population into management process by development and realization of different programs and projects plays the increasing role in current conditions. In the article, the positive sides of the business-project as the main mechanism of the program and project implementation with utilizing market institutes of the public-private partnership (PPP) are analyzed. The role of collectives and the population in the increase of innovative activity and system territory development is assessed.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandr Tatarkin & Ksenia Novikova, 2015. "Territorial Innovative Potential in Behavioral Assessments of the Population," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 279-294.
    • Handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2015:i:3:p:279-294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2015/September_2015/ERSeptember2015_279_294.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ugo Fratesi & Lanfranco Senn (ed.), 2009. "Growth and Innovation of Competitive Regions," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-540-70924-4.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Golejewska, 2012. "Rola instytucji w gospodarce opartej na wiedzy: aspekt regionalny," Working Papers of Economics of European Integration Division 1202, The Univeristy of Gdansk, Faculty of Economics, Economics of European Integration Division.
    2. José María García Álvarez-Coque & Francisco Mas-Verdú & Norat Roig-Tierno, 2017. "Technological innovation versus non-technological innovation: different conditions in different regional contexts?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 1955-1967, September.
    3. Ugo Fratesi & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2016. "The crisis and regional employment in Europe: what role for sheltered economies?," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 9(1), pages 33-57.
    4. Ugo Fratesi, 2012. "A globalization-based taxonomy of European regions," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(1), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Salone Carlo & Segre Giovanna, 2012. "Culture and Creativity in the Territorial Local Systems. Tales in Search for a Theoretical Scheme," EBLA Working Papers 201201, University of Turin.
    6. Riccardo Crescenzi & Mara Giua, 2016. "The EU Cohesion Policy in context: Does a bottom-up approach work in all regions?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(11), pages 2340-2357, November.
    7. Giorgio D'Agostino & Margherita Scarlato, 2011. "Innovation, Growth and Quality of Life: a Theoretical Model and an Estimate for the Italian Regions," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0138, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    8. Ernest Miguélez & Rosina Moreno, 2013. "Skilled labour mobility, networks and knowledge creation in regions: a panel data approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 51(1), pages 191-212, August.
    9. Arbia, Giuseppe & Espa, Giuseppe & Giuliani, Diego & Mazzitelli, Andrea, 2010. "Detecting the existence of space-time clustering of firms," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 311-323, September.
    10. Jakub Grabowski & Jarosław Ropęga & Anna Walecka & Marta Wiśniewska, 2023. "Using Energy Policies to Shape Local Competitive Advantages," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Musolino Dario & Silvetti Alessia, 2020. "Are Mountain Areas Attractive for Investments? The Case of the Alpine Provinces in Italy," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(4), pages 469-493, December.
    12. Gutiérrez-Lagunes, Mario & Quintana-Estrada, Aderak & Vera-González, Alejandra, 2016. "Sector servicios: un diagnóstico del producto interno bruto en México. Periodo 2000-2015," eseconomía, Escuela Superior de Economía, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, vol. 11(45), pages 105-132, Segundo s.
    13. Riccardo Crescenzi & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2012. "An ‘Integrated’ Framework For The Comparative Analysis Of The Territorial Innovation Dynamics Of Developed And Emerging Countries," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 517-533, July.
    14. Pei-xiao Qi & Nian Zheng, 2018. "Scientific Culture and Economic Growth in the Long-Run: On a Capital Perspective," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(1), pages 39-45, June.
    15. Tatarkin, A.I. & Novikova, K.A., 2015. "The innovative capacity of a territory in behavioral assessments of its population," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 1(3), pages 368-380.
    16. Carlo Carboni & Francesco Orazi, 2014. "The Adriatic-Ionian Macroregion in the Eurasian Socio-economic Future," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 2(3), pages 14-27.
    17. Eric Marcon & Florence Puech, 2016. "A typology of distance-based measures of spatial concentration," Post-Print halshs-00679993, HAL.
    18. Ernest Miguelez & Rosina Moreno, 2017. "Networks, Diffusion of Knowledge, and Regional Innovative Performance," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 40(4), pages 331-336, July.
    19. Pierluigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2014. "Understanding culture-led local development: A critique of alternative theoretical explanations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(13), pages 2806-2821, October.
    20. Bucci, Alberto & Segre, Giovanna, 2011. "Culture and human capital in a two-sector endogenous growth model," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 279-293, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2015:i:3:p:279-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Naydenov (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.economyofregion.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.