Changing Performance of Business Groups over Two Decades: Technological Capabilities and Investment Inefficiency in Korean Chaebols
This article differentiates itself from the large volume of existing literature on business groups, such as Korean chaebols, in several aspects. First, it uses productive efficiency rather than financial efficiency as a performance measure. Second, it defines chaebols in three alternative ways and checks whether the results are robust. Third and most important, it explains the sources of the post-crisis change in the performance of Korean chaebols in terms of technological capabilities and investment inefficiency. This study finds that chaebols have become more efficient than non-chaebols in the post-crisis period compared with the pre-crisis period, that inefficiency in investment has always been critical in determining productive inefficiency, and that after the 1997 financial crisis Korean chaebols have improved their performance by reducing investment inefficiencies and enhancing technological capabilities. The results of this study are consistent with the often-acknowledged advantages of business group firms: first, technological capabilities can be shared among affiliated firms; and second, technological capabilities can be combined with project- or entry-execution capability. This article also shows that, with globalization and liberalization, technological capabilities have emerged to be more important in recent years than in the past when what was more important was exploiting market imperfections and artificial rents. (c) 2009 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:v:57:y:2009:i:2:p:359-386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Journals Division)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.