IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/techni/v4y2022i1p145-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traditional media versus social media: challenges and opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Marwan Walid Mohammad Al-Quran

Abstract

The current research study aimed to frame the ongoing and growing debate in the academic field about the overlapping relationship between traditional media and social media outlets. Particularly, the study sought to present an in-depth and inclusive discussion about the traditional media and social media, focusing on the challenges and opportunities of each type. It is worth mentioning that the present study adopted the Semi-Systematic Review Approach through which the findings of a sample of studies that are consistent and similar to the current study’s topic have been identified, selected, assessed, synthesized and summarized in an explicit and planned manner which eventually led to allow the researcher to make inferences based on analyzing the resulting summary indicated in advance. The findings of the data analysis demonstrated that the traditional media and the social media have their pros and cons. Additionally, there are major differences between the two types, including: while traditional media generally offers a wider audience pool, social media allows for more targeted distribution; social media is immediate, while traditional can be delayed due to press times; traditional media pieces are more final, where social media is dynamic; social media offers more control over the message than traditional media; social media is a two-way conversation, and traditional is one-way, i.e., with social media, the public has the opportunity to voice their opinions. Furthermore, the findings of the study revealed that although social media has become the most convenient and prevalent communication channel with the ability to reach a broader audience, and although the rise of new media, particularly social media, has put a danger to the survival of some traditional media outlets and reduced their readership and viewership, however traditional media, which is no longer as dominant as it once was, is still a relevant source of information for society and a wide audience who are looking for the credibility and reliability of the news that is circulated on social media. Finally, the study concluded that despite the fact that traditional media and social media both have their pros and cons, however the relationship between them is still a relationship of integration, not a relationship of exclusion or cancellation. Thus, instead of being pitted against one another, traditional and social media outlets can go hand-in-hand through developing a successful integration, a complementary relationship, and a sustainable sharing processes between the traditional media and the social media outlets in a collaborative, cohesive, and in an ethical manner, as such integration would enhance their roles and services, provide added values than ever, and enable them to reach the widest amount of people at an effective frequency and deliver –in record time and without interference- an easily accessible content that is more interesting and present such content in an attractive way which responds to the targeted audience’s requests and meet their expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Marwan Walid Mohammad Al-Quran, 2022. "Traditional media versus social media: challenges and opportunities," Technium, Technium Science, vol. 4(1), pages 145-160.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:techni:v:4:y:2022:i:1:p:145-160
    DOI: 10.47577/technium.v4i10.8012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/technium/article/view/8012/2915
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/technium/article/view/8012
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/technium.v4i10.8012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dumitrela Florentina Cantor & Mihaela Rus & Tanase Tasente, 2021. "Media communication strategies in the central public administration," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 19(1), pages 191-211, May.
    2. Kietzmann, Jan H. & Hermkens, Kristopher & McCarthy, Ian P. & Silvestre, Bruno S., 2011. "Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 241-251, May.
    3. repec:thr:techub:10019:y:2021:i:1:p:191-211 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Mitchell J. Lovett & Richard Staelin, 2016. "The Role of Paid, Earned, and Owned Media in Building Entertainment Brands: Reminding, Informing, and Enhancing Enjoyment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 142-157, January.
    5. Kaplan, Andreas M., 2012. "If you love something, let it go mobile: Mobile marketing and mobile social media 4x4," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 129-139.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bastos, Wilson, 2020. "“Speaking of Purchases”: How Conversational Potential Determines Consumers' Willingness to Exert Effort for Experiential Versus Material Purchases," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-16.
    2. Roma, Paolo & Aloini, Davide, 2019. "How does brand-related user-generated content differ across social media? Evidence reloaded," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 322-339.
    3. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk & Grzegorz Wesołowski, 2021. "The Effect of Using Social Media in the Modern Marketing Communication on the Shaping an External Employer’s Image," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    4. de Regt, Anouk & Barnes, Stuart J. & Plangger, Kirk, 2020. "The virtual reality value chain," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 737-748.
    5. Juliandi, Azuar, 2017. "The culture of social media at work place," INA-Rxiv 4gwcy, Center for Open Science.
    6. Smith, Andrew N. & Fischer, Eileen & Yongjian, Chen, 2012. "How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 102-113.
    7. Krystyna Mazurek-Lopacinska & Magdalena Sobocinska, 2021. "Social Media in Marketing Activities of Enterprises in the Light of the Analysis of Empirical Research Results," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 647-658.
    8. Monica Patrut, 2015. "Candidates In The Presidential Elections In Romania (2014): The Use Of Social Media In Political Marketing," Studies and Scientific Researches. Economics Edition, "Vasile Alecsandri" University of Bacau, Faculty of Economic Sciences, issue 21.
    9. Marcel Rosenberger & Christiane Lehrer & Reinhard Jung, 0. "Integrating data from user activities of social networks into public administrations," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-14.
    10. Sikandar Ali Qalati & Dragana Ostic & Gu Shuibin & Fan Mingyue, 2022. "A mediated–moderated model for social media adoption and small and medium‐sized enterprise performance in emerging countries," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 846-861, April.
    11. Fracarolli Nunes, Mauro & Lee Park, Camila & Shin, Hyunju, 2021. "Corporate social and environmental irresponsibilities in supply chains, contamination, and damage of intangible resources: A behavioural approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    12. Rydén, Pernille & Ringberg, Torsten & Wilke, Ricky, 2015. "How Managers' Shared Mental Models of Business–Customer Interactions Create Different Sensemaking of Social Media," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 1-16.
    13. Prpić, John & Shukla, Prashant P. & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian P., 2015. "How to work a crowd: Developing crowd capital through crowdsourcing," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 77-85.
    14. Vasile-Daniel Păvăloaia & Elena-Mădălina Teodor & Doina Fotache & Magdalena Danileţ, 2019. "Opinion Mining on Social Media Data: Sentiment Analysis of User Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Zhang, Chu-Bing & Zhang, Zhuo-Ping & Chang, Ying & Li, Tian-Ge & Hou, Ru-Jing, 2022. "Effect of WeChat interaction on brand evaluation: A moderated mediation model of para-social interaction and affiliative tendency," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Sarbu Miruna, 2017. "Does Social Media Increase Labour Productivity?," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 237(2), pages 81-113, April.
    17. Eigenraam, Anniek W. & Eelen, Jiska & Verlegh, Peeter W.J., 2021. "Let Me Entertain You? The Importance of Authenticity in Online Customer Engagement," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 53-68.
    18. Shiwei Shen & Marios Sotiriadis & Qing Zhou, 2020. "Could Smart Tourists Be Sustainable and Responsible as Well? The Contribution of Social Networking Sites to Improving Their Sustainable and Responsible Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Perez-Vega, Rodrigo & Hopkinson, Paul & Singhal, Aishwarya & Mariani, Marcello M., 2022. "From CRM to social CRM: A bibliometric review and research agenda for consumer research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-16.
    20. Murad Ali & Raja Ahmad Iskandar Bin Raja Yaacob & Mohd Nuri-Al-Amin B. Endut, 2017. "The Influence of Individual Characteristics towards the Use of Social Media as a Learning Tool: An Empirical Analysis," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 251-256.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:techni:v:4:y:2022:i:1:p:145-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Maria Golita (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.