IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v21y2021i10p1328-1346.html

A green COVID-19 recovery of the EU basic materials sector: identifying potentials, barriers and policy solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Chiappinelli
  • Timo Gerres
  • Karsten Neuhoff
  • Frederik Lettow
  • Heleen de Coninck
  • Balázs Felsmann
  • Eugénie Joltreau
  • Gauri Khandekar
  • Pedro Linares
  • Jörn Richstein
  • Aleksander Śniegocki
  • Jan Stede
  • Tomas Wyns
  • Cornelis Zandt
  • Lars Zetterberg

Abstract

This paper explores climate-friendly projects that could be part of the COVID-19 recovery while jump-starting the transition of the European basic materials industry. Findings from a literature review on technology options in advanced development stages for climate-friendly production, enhanced sorting, and recycling of steel, cement, aluminium, and plastics, are combined with insights from interviews with 31 European stakeholders in these sectors about the practical and economic feasibility of these technology options. Results indicate that with an estimated investment of 28.9 billion Euros, up to 20% of EU’s basic materials could be produced through low-emission processes or additional recycling by 2025 with technologies that are commercially available or at pilot scale today. However, our stakeholder consultation also shows that in order to make these short-term investments viable, six main barriers need to be addressed, namely: (i) the lack of effective and predictable carbon pricing, (ii) the limited availability of affordable green electricity, (iii) the lack of a regulatory framework for circularity, (iv) low technology market readiness and funding, (v) the lack of infrastructure for hydrogen, CO2 and power, and (vi) the lack of demand for climate-friendly and recycled materials. Based on these insights, the paper proposes elements of a policy package that can create a framework favourable for investments in these technologies; these policies should ideally accompany the recovery package to give credibility to investors that the business case will last beyond the recovery period.Key policy insightsTechnologies for climate-friendly materials production, sorting and recycling can be supported as part of the recovery package but require an enabling policy framework.Combining continued free allocation with a Climate Contribution within the EU ETS can enhance economic viability of climate-friendly options.Project-based Carbon Contracts for Difference can eliminate carbon price uncertainty for climate-friendly processes.Auctions for publicly backed Contracts for Difference and Power Purchasing Agreements can guarantee price-stability of low-emission electricity.Green public procurement and public-private partnerships can provide infrastructure for hydrogen, CO2 and electricity while creating demand for climate-friendly materials.Revising regulations on product design and end-of-life emissions can improve sorting and recycling incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Chiappinelli & Timo Gerres & Karsten Neuhoff & Frederik Lettow & Heleen de Coninck & Balázs Felsmann & Eugénie Joltreau & Gauri Khandekar & Pedro Linares & Jörn Richstein & Aleksander Śniegocki &, 2021. "A green COVID-19 recovery of the EU basic materials sector: identifying potentials, barriers and policy solutions," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(10), pages 1328-1346, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:21:y:2021:i:10:p:1328-1346
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2021.1922340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2021.1922340
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2021.1922340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hörbe Emanuelsson, Anna & Rootzén, Johan & Johnsson, Filip, 2025. "Financing high-cost measures for deep emission cuts in the basic materials industry – Proposal for a value chain transition fund," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Angela Köppl & Margit Schratzenstaller-Altzinger, 2022. "Macroeconomic Effects of Green Recovery Programmes. Conceptual Framing and a Review of the Empirical Literature," WIFO Working Papers 646, WIFO.
    3. Leon Stolle & Jonas Boeschemeier & Benjamin F. Hobbs & Karsten Neuhoff, 2026. "Designing Hedging Instruments for Locational Price Risks – Lessons from North American Financial Transmission Rights," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2156, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Juhi Kamra & Ambica Prakash Mani & Sudhanshu Joshi & Manu Sharma, 2025. "Measures to decarbonize the cement industry; an AHP analysis," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 1-71, August.
    5. Sun, Xi & Neuhoff, Karsten, 2025. "Nobody decides for all — Modeling incentives and policies for closing the material loop," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    6. Chiappinelli, Olga & Seres, Gyula, 2024. "Optimal discounts in green public procurement," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    7. Renata Slabe-Erker & Kaja Primc & Darja Zabavnik, 2026. "New thematic relationships in the green recovery literature," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 2631-2642, February.
    8. Xi Sun, 2023. "The Role of Carbon Pricing in Promoting Material Recycling: A Model of Multi-Market Interactions," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2034, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Honma, Satoshi & Ushifusa, Yoshiaki & Okamura, Soyoka & Vandercamme, Lilu, 2023. "Measuring carbon emissions performance of Japan's metal industry: Energy inputs, agglomeration, and the potential for green recovery reduction," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. Han-Sol Lee & Ekaterina A. Degtereva & Alexander M. Zobov, 2021. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions’ Determinants: New Empirical Evidence from Quasi-Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Models," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Wilde, Kerstin & Hermans, Frans, 2024. "Transition towards a bioeconomy: Comparison of conditions and institutional work in selected industries," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 50, pages 1-1.
    12. Chiappinelli, Olga & Giuffrida, Leonardo M. & Spagnolo, Giancarlo, 2023. "Public procurement as an innovation policy: Where do we stand?," ZEW Discussion Papers 23-002, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    13. Eduard Wagner, 2025. "Information Barriers to Circularity for Electronic Products and the Potential of Digital Product Passports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Samir Jeddi & Dominic Lencz & Theresa Wildgrube, 2021. "Complementing carbon prices with Carbon Contracts for Difference in the presence of risk - When is it beneficial and when not?," EWI Working Papers 2021-9, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L61 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Metals and Metal Products; Cement; Glass; Ceramics
    • L65 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Chemicals; Rubber; Drugs; Biotechnology; Plastics
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q55 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Technological Innovation
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:21:y:2021:i:10:p:1328-1346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.