IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7197-d837138.html

The Landscape and Roadmap of the Research and Innovation Infrastructures in Energy: A Review of the Case Study of the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Zoya Pourmirza

    (School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)

  • Seyed Hamid Reza Hosseini

    (Scottish and Southern Energy, Perth PH1 3NT, UK)

  • Sara Walker

    (School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)

  • Damian Giaouris

    (School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)

  • Philip Taylor

    (Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK)

Abstract

Research and development are critical for driving economic growth. To realise the UK government’s Industrial Strategy, we develop an energy research and innovation infrastructure roadmap and landscape for the energy sector looking to the long term (2030). This study is based on a picture of existing UK infrastructure on energy. It shows the links between the energy sector and other sectors, the distribution of energy research and innovation infrastructures, the age of these infrastructures, where most of the energy research and innovation infrastructures are hosted, and the distribution of energy research and innovation infrastructures according to their legal structure. Next, this study identifies the roadmap of energy research and innovation infrastructures by 2030, based on a categorisation of the energy sector into seven subsectors. Challenges and future requirements are explored for each of the sub-sectors, encompassing fossil fuels and nuclear energy to renewable energy sources and hydrogen, and from pure science to applied engineering. The study discusses the potential facilities to address these challenges within each sub-sector. It explores the e-infrastructure and data needs for the energy sector and provides a discussion on other sectors of the economy that energy research and innovation infrastructures contribute to. Some of the key messages identified in this study are the need for further large-scale initiative and large demonstrators of multi-vector energy systems, the need for multi-disciplinary research and innovation, and the need for greater data sharing and cyber-physical demonstrators. Finally, this work will serve as an important study to provide guidance for future investment strategy for the energy sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoya Pourmirza & Seyed Hamid Reza Hosseini & Sara Walker & Damian Giaouris & Philip Taylor, 2022. "The Landscape and Roadmap of the Research and Innovation Infrastructures in Energy: A Review of the Case Study of the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7197-:d:837138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7197/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7197/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nemet, Gregory F. & Zipperer, Vera & Kraus, Martina, 2018. "The valley of death, the technology pork barrel, and public support for large demonstration projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 154-167.
    2. repec:aen:journl:ej38-3-hartley is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcin Dębowski & Izabela Świca & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Zieliński, 2022. "Large Scale Microalgae Biofuel Technology—Development Perspectives in Light of the Barriers and Limitations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Ahmed Eltweri & Wa’el Al-karaki & Yuan Zhai & Khadijah Abdullah & Alessio Faccia, 2024. "UK Hydrogen Roadmap: Financial and Strategic Insights into Oil and Gas Industry’s Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-31, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher J. Blackburn & Mallory E. Flowers & Daniel C. Matisoff & Juan Moreno‐Cruz, 2020. "Do Pilot and Demonstration Projects Work? Evidence from a Green Building Program," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1100-1132, September.
    2. Deleidi, Matteo & Mazzucato, Mariana & Semieniuk, Gregor, 2020. "Neither crowding in nor out: Public direct investment mobilising private investment into renewable electricity projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. Wang, Nan & Akimoto, Keigo & Nemet, Gregory F., 2021. "What went wrong? Learning from three decades of carbon capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS) pilot and demonstration projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Jonas Meckling & Clara Galeazzi & Esther Shears & Tong Xu & Laura Diaz Anadon, 2022. "Energy innovation funding and institutions in major economies," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(9), pages 876-885, September.
    5. Herman, Kyle S. & Hall, Jeremy K. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Iskandarova, Marfuga, 2025. "The industrial decarbonization paradigm: Carbon lock-in or path renewal in the United Kingdom?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    6. René Yepes-Callejas, Jim Giraldo-Builes, Iván Dario Rojas-Arenas Elizabeth Jiménez-Medina, 2021. "Valle de la muerte: factores que dificultan el éxito de innovaciones tecnológicas," Revista CEA, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, vol. 7(15), pages 1-23.
    7. Olga Chiappinelli & Timo Gerres & Karsten Neuhoff & Frederik Lettow & Heleen de Coninck & Balázs Felsmann & Eugénie Joltreau & Gauri Khandekar & Pedro Linares & Jörn Richstein & Aleksander Śniegocki &, 2021. "A green COVID-19 recovery of the EU basic materials sector: identifying potentials, barriers and policy solutions," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(10), pages 1328-1346, November.
    8. Åhman, Max & Skjærseth, Jon Birger & Eikeland, Per Ove, 2018. "Demonstrating climate mitigation technologies: An early assessment of the NER 300 programme," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 100-107.
    9. Bossink, Bart, 2020. "Learning strategies in sustainable energy demonstration projects: What organizations learn from sustainable energy demonstrations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    10. Jugend, Daniel & Fiorini, Paula De Camargo & Armellini, Fabiano & Ferrari, Aline Gabriela, 2020. "Public support for innovation: A systematic review of the literature and implications for open innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Bento, Nuno & Fontes, Margarida, 2019. "Emergence of floating offshore wind energy: Technology and industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 66-82.
    12. Ward, S.H. & Lopes Cardozo, N.J., 2025. "Value-led fusion technology: A framework for guiding fusion commercialisation strategy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Adrian Odenweller & Falko Ueckerdt, 2024. "The green hydrogen ambition and implementation gap," Papers 2406.07210, arXiv.org.
    14. Dean, Tereza & Zhang, Haisu & Xiao, Yazhen, 2022. "The role of complexity in the Valley of Death and radical innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. S. Andresen & G. Bang & J. B. Skjærseth & A. Underdal, 2021. "Achieving the ambitious targets of the Paris Agreement: the role of key actors," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-7, March.
    16. Mariana Mazzucato & Gregor Semieniuk, 2017. "Public financing of innovation: new questions," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 24-48.
    17. Joelle Noailly, 2022. "Directing innovation towards a low-carbon future," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 72, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    18. Elia, A. & Kamidelivand, M. & Rogan, F. & Ó Gallachóir, B., 2021. "Impacts of innovation on renewable energy technology cost reductions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    19. Geddes, Anna & Schmidt, Tobias S., 2020. "Integrating finance into the multi-level perspective: Technology niche-finance regime interactions and financial policy interventions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(6).
    20. Chiappinelli, Olga & Giuffrida, Leonardo M. & Spagnolo, Giancarlo, 2025. "Public procurement as an innovation policy: Where do we stand?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7197-:d:837138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.