IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Dynamic Origin-constrained Spatial Interaction Model Applied to Poland's Inter-provincial Migration


  • Anna Sarra
  • Mariarosaria Del Signore


Abstract In contemporary Europe migratory processes are becoming inceasingly important, given the diminishing impact of natural changes on population dynamics. In this paper, we focus on some determinants of internal migration in Poland. The choice of variables is guided by recent considerations about interregional migration in other transitional economies. The quantitative analysis of Polish migration flows has been performed by considering migration interactions over time. A dynamic version of an origin-constrained spatial interaction model is proposed. This approach relies on using the method of offsets, generalizing the Poisson regression framework, and applied to the calibration of spatial interaction models. Modèle dynamique d'interactions spatiales limitées par l'origine, appliqué aux migrations interprovinciales en Pologne RÉSUMÉ Dans l'Europe contemporaine, les processus migratoires acquièrent une importance toujours majeure, compte tenu de la réduction de l'impact des changements naturels sur la dynamique de la population. Dans la présente communication, nous nous concentrons sur certains facteurs déterminants de la migration interne en Pologne. Le choix des variables est déterminé par de récentes considérations concernant les migrations interrégionales dans d'autres économies transitionnelles. On procède à l'analyse quantitative des flux migratoires polonais, en examinant des interactions migratoires progressives. On propose une version dynamique d'un modèle d'interaction spatiale limité par l'origine: ce principe est basé sur l'utilisation de la méthode d'offsets, généralisant le cadre de régression de Poisson, et appliqué au calibrage de modèles d'interaction spatiale. Modelo dinámico de interacción espacial restringido por origen aplicado a la emigración interprovincial de Polonia RÉSUMÉ En la Europa contemporánea, los procesos migratorios son cada vez más importantes debido al decreciente impacto de los cambios naturales sobre la dinámica de la población. En este trabajo, nos centramos en algunos de los determinantes de la emigración interna en Polonia. La elección de variables se guía por consideraciones recientes sobre la emigración interregional en otras economías transicionales. El análisis cuantitativo de los flujos polacos de emigración se ha realizado considerando las interacciones de emigración a través del tiempo. Se propone una versión dinámica de un modelo de interacción espacial restringido por origen. Este planteamiento se basa en el empleo del método de compensaciones (method of offsets), generalizando el marco de regresión Poisson, y aplicándolo a la calibración de modelos de interacción espacial.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Sarra & Mariarosaria Del Signore, 2010. "A Dynamic Origin-constrained Spatial Interaction Model Applied to Poland's Inter-provincial Migration," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 29-41.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:specan:v:5:y:2010:i:1:p:29-41 DOI: 10.1080/17421770903511361

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Kim, Seong-Hee & Pickton, Todd S. & Gerking, Shelby, 2003. "Foreign Direct Investment: Agglomeration Economies and Returns to Promotion Expenditures," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 33(1), pages 61-72.
    2. Ciccone, Antonio, 2002. "Agglomeration effects in Europe," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 213-227, February.
    3. Henderson, J V, 1974. "The Sizes and Types of Cities," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, pages 640-656.
    4. Yuko Kinoshita & Nauro F. Campos, 2003. "Why Does Fdi Go Where it Goes? New Evidence From the Transition Economies," IMF Working Papers 03/228, International Monetary Fund.
    5. Paul Krugman & Anthony J. Venables, 1995. "Globalization and the Inequality of Nations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 110(4), pages 857-880.
    6. Rice, Patricia & Venables, Anthony J. & Patacchini, Eleonora, 2006. "Spatial determinants of productivity: Analysis for the regions of Great Britain," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 727-752, November.
    7. Lubomira Anastassova, 2006. "Productivity Differences and Agglomeration Across Districts of Great Britain," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp289, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    8. Stuart S. Rosenthal & William C. Strange, 1999. "Geography, Industrial Organization, and Agglomeration," Center for Policy Research Working Papers 14, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University.
    9. Cem Ertur & Julie Le Gallo & Catherine Baumont, 2006. "The European Regional Convergence Process, 1980-1995: Do Spatial Regimes and Spatial Dependence Matter?," International Regional Science Review, , pages 3-34.
    10. Baltagi, Badi H. & Liu, Long, 2011. "Instrumental variable estimation of a spatial autoregressive panel model with random effects," Economics Letters, Elsevier, pages 135-137.
    11. Baldwin, Richard E. & Martin, Philippe, 2004. "Agglomeration and regional growth," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics,in: J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 60, pages 2671-2711 Elsevier.
    12. Fujita,Masahisa & Thisse,Jacques-François, 2013. "Economics of Agglomeration," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107001411, November.
    13. Henderson, J V, 1974. "The Sizes and Types of Cities," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, pages 640-656.
    14. Brülhart, Marius & Mathys, Nicole A., 2008. "Sectoral agglomeration economies in a panel of European regions," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 348-362, July.
    15. Dekle, Robert & Eaton, Jonathan, 1999. "Agglomeration and Land Rents: Evidence from the Prefectures," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 200-214, September.
    16. Benhabib, Jess & Spiegel, Mark M., 1994. "The role of human capital in economic development evidence from aggregate cross-country data," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 143-173, October.
    17. Ciccone, Antonio & Hall, Robert E, 1996. "Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, pages 54-70.
    18. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    19. Rosenthal, Stuart S. & Strange, William C., 2004. "Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics,in: J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 49, pages 2119-2171 Elsevier.
    20. repec:hhs:iuiwop:430 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Angels Pelegrin & Catalina Bolance, 2008. "Regional Foreign Direct Investment in Manufacturing. Do Agglomeration Economies Matter?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 505-522.
    22. Stuart S. Rosenthal & William C. Strange, 2003. "Geography, Industrial Organization, and Agglomeration," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 85(2), pages 377-393, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Dynamic spatial interaction models; internal migration; Poisson models; offsets model; C13; C25; R23;

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C25 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions; Probabilities
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:specan:v:5:y:2010:i:1:p:29-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.