IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v33y2013i13-14p1326-1344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physicians' appraisal of mobile health monitoring

Author

Listed:
  • Shintaro Okazaki
  • J. Alberto Castañeda
  • Silvia Sanz
  • Jörg Henseler

Abstract

This study addresses what factors influence and moderate Japanese physicians' mobile health monitoring (MHM) adoption for diabetic patients. In light of the multilevel sequential check theory, the study tests whether novelty seeking, self-efficacy, and compatibility moderate the effects of overall quality, net benefits, and perceived value of MHM on physicians' usage intention. Self-efficacy serves as an evaluation of resources for coping with an event, while compatibility involves the judgment of an event's congruence with a motive or goal. The study results support four out of nine moderation hypotheses. Our findings clearly indicate that the impact of overall quality and net benefits on physicians' intention to use MHM would be significantly strengthened by self-efficacy and compatibility, but not by novelty seeking.

Suggested Citation

  • Shintaro Okazaki & J. Alberto Castañeda & Silvia Sanz & Jörg Henseler, 2013. "Physicians' appraisal of mobile health monitoring," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(13-14), pages 1326-1344, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:33:y:2013:i:13-14:p:1326-1344
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2013.815737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2013.815737
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2013.815737?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Midgley, David F & Dowling, Grahame R, 1978. "Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(4), pages 229-242, March.
    2. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    3. Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1980. "Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 7(3), pages 283-295, December.
    4. Shirley Taylor & Peter A. Todd, 1995. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 144-176, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    2. Seung-Hwan Jang, 2017. "The Effects of R&D Researchers’ Quality Management System Application on their Work Performance in Korea," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 10-16.
    3. San Martín, Héctor & Herrero, Ángel, 2012. "Influence of the user’s psychological factors on the online purchase intention in rural tourism: Integrating innovativeness to the UTAUT framework," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 341-350.
    4. Dennys Eduardo Rossetto & Roberto Carlos Bernardes & Felipe Mendes Borini & Cristiane Chaves Gattaz, 2018. "Structure and evolution of innovation research in the last 60 years: review and future trends in the field of business through the citations and co-citations analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1329-1363, June.
    5. Lokesh Jasrai, 2014. "Measuring Mobile Telecom Service Innovativeness Among Youth," Paradigm, , vol. 18(1), pages 103-116, June.
    6. Christina Öberg, 2016. "How Innovation Impacts Artistic Creativity — Managing Innovation In The Advertising Sector," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(04), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Borhan, Muhamad Nazri & Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi & Miskeen, Manssour A. Abdulasalm, 2019. "Extending the theory of planned behaviour to predict the intention to take the new high-speed rail for intercity travel in Libya: Assessment of the influence of novelty seeking, trust and external inf," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 373-384.
    8. Lalicic, Lidija & Dickinger, Astrid, 2019. "An assessment of user-driven innovativeness in a mobile computing travel platform," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 233-241.
    9. Robinson, Leroy Jr. & Marshall, Greg W. & Stamps, Miriam B., 2005. "Sales force use of technology: antecedents to technology acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(12), pages 1623-1631, December.
    10. Hossein Nasiri Zarandi & Fereshteh Lotfizadeh, 2016. "The Influence of Cognitive Innovativeness on the Behavior and Style of Consumer Adoption: Implications for Electronic-Banking Service Adoption," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(5), pages 90-103, October.
    11. Eric Schmidbauer, 2013. "New and Improved?," Working Papers 2013-01, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.
    12. Zhiyuan Yu & Doudou Jin, 2021. "Determinants of Users’ Attitude and Intention to Intelligent Connected Vehicle Infotainment in the 5G-V2X Mobile Ecosystem," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Johan Jansson, 2011. "Consumer eco‐innovation adoption: assessing attitudinal factors and perceived product characteristics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 192-210, March.
    14. Nawal Abdalla Adam, 2016. "An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Technological Factors on Computer ¨C Based Information Systems (CBIS) Usage by Managers in Banking Sector in Sudan," Journal of Social Science Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(1), pages 12-22, January.
    15. Chao, Chih-Wei & Reid, Mike & Mavondo, Felix T., 2012. "Consumer innovativeness influence on really new product adoption," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 211-217.
    16. Dalal Bamufleh & Maram Abdulrahman Almalki & Randa Almohammadi & Esraa Alharbi, 2021. "User Acceptance of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems in Higher Education Institutions: A Conceptual Model," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 17(1), pages 144-163, January.
    17. Hinz, Oliver & Schulze, Christian & Takac, Carsten, 2014. "New product adoption in social networks: Why direction matters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2836-2844.
    18. Seok Chan Jeong & Beom-Jin Choi, 2022. "Moderating Effects of Consumers’ Personal Innovativeness on the Adoption and Purchase Intention of Wearable Devices," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    19. Barbara H. Wixom & Peter A. Todd, 2005. "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 85-102, March.
    20. Leroux, Erick & Pupion, Pierre-Charles, 2018. "Factors of adoption of eco-labelling in hotel industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 194-209.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:33:y:2013:i:13-14:p:1326-1344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.