IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Scaling Innovation in South East Asia: Empirical Evidence from Singapore, Penang (Malaysia) and Bangkok

Listed author(s):
  • Javier Revilla Diez
  • Matthias Kiese

Diez J. R. and Kiese M. (2006) Scaling innovation in South East Asia: empirical evidence from Singapore, Penang (Malaysia) and Bangkok, Regional Studies 40, 1-19. Our survey of 1600 manufacturing firms in Singapore, Penang (Malaysia) and Bangkok shows that the breadth and efficiency of innovative activities still lag considerably behind those found in 11 European regions. Cooperations are virtually indispensable for corporate innovation processes in the region. Their strong orientation towards headquarters or research and development centres of multinational corporations and lead users in technologically advanced countries yields a discontinuous territorial pattern of linkages in which firms 'leapfrog' neighbouring South East Asian countries (ASEAN), contrasting sharply with the distance-decay pattern found in Europe. Further research should employ multidimensional concepts of space to accommodate the territorial, techno-economic, organizational, relational and temporal dimensions of innovation networks. Diez J. R. et Kiese M. (2006) L'innovation en Asie du Sud: des preuves empiriques provenant du Singapour, de Penang (en Malaysie) et de Bangkok, Regional Studies 40, 1-19. Une enquete aupres de 1600 entreprises industrielles situees au Singapour, en Penang et a Bangkok, montre que l'etendue et l'efficacite des activites innovatrices sont manifestement en retard par rapport a celles des activites situees dans onze regions europeennes. La cooperation est quasi-indispensable pour les processus d'innovation des entreprises dans la region. Privilegiant les sieges sociaux ou les centres de R et D des societes multinationales et des entreprises-phares des pays a la pointe de la technologie fournit une distribution territoriale discontinue des liens ou les entreprises devancent les pays de l'ASEAN (Association des nations du Sud-Est asiatique) limitrophes, ce qui contraste avec la distribution en Europe qui indique le declin en fonction de la distance. De plus amples recherches devraient employer des notions multidimensionnelles de l'espace qui s'adaptent aux dimensions territoriales, techno-economiques, organisationnelles, relationnelles et temporelles des reseaux d'innovation. Systemes d'innovation regionaux Diez J. R. und Kiese M. (2006) Umfang der Innovation in SO Asien: empirische Evidenz aus Singapur, Penang (Malaysia) und Bangkok, Regional Studies 40, 1-19. Die Untersuchung von 1600 Unternehmen des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes in Singapur, Penang und Bangkok zeigt, dass die Breite und Effizienz industrieller Innovationsaktivitaten immer noch betrachtlich hinter den in elf europaischen Regionen angetroffenen zuruckbleibt. Kooperation ist fur betriebliche Innovations prozesse in der Region nahezu unentbehrlich. Ihre starke Ausrichtung auf die Headquarters oder Forschungs-und Entwicklungszentren multiregionaler Korporationen und fuhrende Anwender in technologisch fortschrittlichen Landern ergibt ein unregelmassiges raumliches Muster von Kooperationen, in denen die Unternehmen benachbarte ASEAN-Lander uberspringen, was in scharfem Gegensatz zu dem in Europa anzutreffenden mit der Entfernung abnehmenden Muster steht. Weiteren Forschungsarbeiten wurde ein multidimensionales Raumkonzept dienlich sein, um die Einbeziehung territorialer, techno-okonomischer, organisatorischer, relationaler und zeitlicher Dimensionen der Innovationsnetzwerke zu gestatten. Regionale Innovationssysteme Diez J. R. y Kiese M. (2006) Mejorando la innovacion en el sureste de Asia: Pruebas empiricas de Singapur, Penang (Malaisia) y Bangkok, Regional Studies 40, 1-19. Nuestro estudio, que abarca 1.600 empresas de fabricacion de Singapur, Penang y Bangkok, indica que el volumen y la eficacia de las actividades de innovacion todavia se situan muy por detras de los que se observan en once regiones europeas. La cooperacion es totalmente indispensable en la region para los procesos corporativos de innovacion. Su orientacion solida hacia las sedes o centros de I + D de sociedades multinacionales y usuarios lideres en paises avanzados tecnologicamente produce un modelo territorial descontinuado de vinculos en el que las empresas se pasan por alto a los paises vecinos de la ASEAN, contrastando marcadamente con el modelo de la disminucion de distancia que se observa en Europa. Para profundizar este estudio se deberian emplear conceptos multidimensionales del espacio para dar cabida a dimensiones de caracter territorial, tecnoeconomico, organizativo, relacional y temporal de las redes de innovacion. Sistemas de innovacion regionales

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

Volume (Year): 40 (2006)
Issue (Month): 9 ()
Pages: 1005-1023

in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:9:p:1005-1023
DOI: 10.1080/00343400600928277
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Dieter Ernst, 2002. "Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation systems. Implications for developing countries," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(6), pages 497-523.
  2. Douglass C. North, 1994. "Institutional Competition," Economic History 9411001, EconWPA.
  3. Soete, Luc, 1985. "International diffusion of technology, industrial development and technological leapfrogging," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 409-422, March.
  4. Dosi, Giovanni, 1993. "Technological paradigms and technological trajectories : A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 102-103, April.
  5. Knut Koschatzky & Rolf Sternberg, 2000. "R&D Cooperation in Innovation Systems—Some Lessons from the European Regional Innovation Survey (ERIS)," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 487-501, August.
  6. Brezis, Elise S & Krugman, Paul R & Tsiddon, Daniel, 1993. "Leapfrogging in International Competition: A Theory of Cycles in National Technological Leadership," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(5), pages 1211-1219, December.
  7. North, Douglass C, 1994. "Economic Performance through Time," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(3), pages 359-368, June.
  8. Georg Koopmann & Felix Münnich, 1999. "National and international developments in technology," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;German National Library of Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 34(6), pages 267-278, November.
  9. Cantwell, John & Janne, Odile, 1999. "Technological globalisation and innovative centres: the role of corporate technological leadership and locational hierarchy1," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 119-144, March.
  10. Ron Boschma, 2005. "Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 61-74.
  11. Javier Revilla Diez & Martin Berger, 2004. "The Role of Multinational Corporations in Metropolitan Innovation Systems – Empirical Evidence from Europe and South-East Asia," ERSA conference papers ersa04p642, European Regional Science Association.
  12. Andre Torre & Alain Rallet, 2005. "Proximity and Localization," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 47-59.
  13. Simona Iammarino & Jonathan Michie, 1998. "The Scope of Technological Globalisation," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 335-353.
  14. John Cantwell & Simona Iammarino, 2000. "Multinational Corporations and the Location of Technological Innovation in the UK Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 317-332.
  15. Hassink Robert, 2001. "The Learning Region: A Fuzzy Concept or a Sound Theoretical Basis for Modern Regional Innovation Policies?," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, De Gruyter, vol. 45(1), pages 219-230, October.
  16. Lundvall, Bengt-Ake & Johnson, Bjorn & Andersen, Esben Sloth & Dalum, Bent, 2002. "National systems of production, innovation and competence building," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 213-231, February.
  17. Storper, Michael, 1996. "Innovation as Collective Action: Conventions, Products and Technologies," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 761-790.
  18. Pari Patel & Keith Pavitt, 1991. "Large Firms in the Production of the World’s Technology: An Important Case of “Non-Globalisation”," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 22(1), pages 1-21, March.
  19. Ron Boschma, 2004. "Competitiveness of Regions from an Evolutionary Perspective," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(9), pages 1001-1014.
  20. Foss, Nicolai J, 1998. "The Competence-Based Approach: Veblenian Ideas in the Modern Theory of the Firm," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 479-495, July.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:9:p:1005-1023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.