IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v37y2003i3p289-302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Moulaert
  • Farid Sekia

Abstract

MOULAERT F. and SEKIA F. (2003) Territorial innovation models: a critical survey, Reg. Studies 37 , 289-302. This paper provides a critical review of the literature on territorial innovation models (industrial districts, milieux innovateurs , new industrial spaces, local production systems, etc.). The review is organized in two stages. First, the main features of each of these models and their view of innovation are compared. Second, their theoretical building blocks are reconstructed and evaluated from the point of view of conceptual clarity and analytical coherence. It is found that despite some semantic unity among the concepts used (economies of agglomeration, endogenous development, systems of innovation, evolution and learning, network organization and governance), territorial innovation models (TIMs) suffer from conceptual ambiguity. The latter is mainly a consequence of the way territorial innovation is theorized, i.e. in terms of technologically driven innovation and a business culture that is mainly instrumental to the capitalist market logic. This pressing ideological priority pushes the "conceptual flexibility' of TIMs across the border of coherent theory building. MOULAERT F. et SEKIA F. (2003) Des modeles de l'innovation territoriale: une etude critique, Reg. Studies 37 , 289-302. Cet article cherche a fournir une etude critique de la documenatation sur les modeles de l' innovation territoriale (p.e. districts industriels, milieux innovateurs, nouveaux espaces industriels, systemes de production locaux). L'etude se fait a deux temps. Dans un premier temps, on compare les principaux caracteristiques de chacun de ces modeles et leur point de vue sur l'innovation. Dans un deuxieme temps, on reconstruit et e value leurs elements de base theoriques quant a leur precision conceptuelle et a leur coherence analytique. Il s'avere que malgre une certaine unite semantique pour ce qui est des notions employees (economies d' agglomeration, developpement autochtone, systemes d' innovation, evolution et apprentissage, organisation de reseau et gouvernance), les modeles d'innovation territoriales (MIT) souffrent d'une ambiguite conceptuelle. Ceci remonte a la facon de theoriser l'innovation territoriale; c'est a dire, en termes de l'innovation determinee par la technologie et par une culture d'entreprise qui repond dans une large mesure au credo du marche. La priorite ideologique urgente pousse la " flexibilite conceptuelle' des MIT au-dela de la frontiere de la construction des theories coherentes. MOULAERT F. und SEKIA F. (2003) Territoriale Innovationsmodelle: eine kritische Untersuchung, Reg. Studies 37 , 289-302. Der vorliegende Aufsatz liefert einen kritischen U berblick uber die Literatur, die sich mit territorialen Innovationsmodellen befasst (Industriegebiete, milieux innovateurs, neue Industrieraume, ortliche Produktionssysteme, usw.). Der Uberblick besteht aus zwei Teilen: zuerst werden sowohl die Hauptzuge jedes dieser Modelle als auch ihre Ansichten uber Innovation verglichen. Dem folgt eine Rekonstruktion ihrer theoretischen Bausteine und Bewertung vom Standpunkt konzeptualer Klarheit und analytischer Koharenz. Es zeigt sich, dass trotz einer gewissen semantischen Einheitlichkeit der dabei benutzten Konzepte (Einsparungen durch Ballung, emdogene Entwicklung, Innovationssysteme, Evolution und Lernen, Netzwerkorganisation und -massnahmen) territoriale Innovationsmodelle (TIMs) unter begrifflicher Vieldeutigkeit leiden. Letztere ergibt sich vorallem infolge der Art und Weise in der territoriale Innovation theorisiert wird, d.h. durch Begriffe technologisch betriebener Innovation und eine Unternehmenskultur, die sich vorallem an die Logik des kapitalistischen Marktes wendet. Dieser nachdrucklich ideologische Vorrang schiebt die "konzeptuelle Elastizitat' der TIMs uber die Grenze der Errichtung einer zusammenhangenden Theorie.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Moulaert & Farid Sekia, 2003. "Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 289-302.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:37:y:2003:i:3:p:289-302
    DOI: 10.1080/0034340032000065442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0034340032000065442
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:37:y:2003:i:3:p:289-302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.