IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jculte/v8y2015i6p673-688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributive Justice With and Without Culture

Author

Listed:
  • William A. Jackson

Abstract

Academic treatments of distributive justice normally adopt a static approach centred on resource allocation among a set of individual agents. The resulting models, expressed in mathematical language, make no allowance for culture, as they never engage with the society's way of life or the moulding of individuals within society. This paper compares the static approach to distributive justice with a cultural one, arguing that a case for redistribution should rest upon its cultural effects in assisting well-being and social cohesion. Unless we recognise culture, we can have little understanding of why inequalities matter, where they come from, and how they might be reduced. Redistribution may be motivated by universal value judgements taken from external sources, but it also entails internal cultural changes that refashion social relations through cumulative causation. In practical terms, it has to penetrate beyond reallocating resource endowments to bring revised attitudes in a society less tolerant of unequal outcomes. Egalitarian reforms will flourish only if they generate and reflect an egalitarian culture.

Suggested Citation

  • William A. Jackson, 2015. "Distributive Justice With and Without Culture," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(6), pages 673-688, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:8:y:2015:i:6:p:673-688
    DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2015.1054414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17530350.2015.1054414
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17530350.2015.1054414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard L. Brinkman & June E. Brinkman, 2005. "Cultural lag: a relevant framework for social justice," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(3), pages 228-248, March.
    2. Anthony B. Atkinson & Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez, 2011. "Top Incomes in the Long Run of History," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 49(1), pages 3-71, March.
    3. David Cooper & W. McCausland & Ioannis Theodossiou, 2013. "Income Inequality and Wellbeing: The Plight of the Poor and the Curse of Permanent Inequality," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 939-958.
    4. William A. Jackson, 2013. "The desocialising of economic theory," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(9), pages 809-825, July.
    5. Rosenbaum, Eckehard F, 1999. "Against Naive Materialism: Culture, Consumption and the Causes of Inequality," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 23(3), pages 317-336, May.
    6. William Jackson, 2005. "Capabilities, Culture and Social Structure," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(1), pages 101-124.
    7. William A. Jackson, 2013. "The desocialising of economic theory," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 40(9), pages 809-825, July.
    8. Jason Glynos & Robin Klimecki & Hugh Willmott, 2012. "Cooling Out The Marks," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 297-320, January.
    9. Sen, Amartya, 1997. "On Economic Inequality," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198292975.
    10. Cruces, Guillermo & Perez-Truglia, Ricardo & Tetaz, Martin, 2013. "Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 100-112.
    11. Koen Caminada & Kees Goudswaard, 2001. "International Trends in Income Inequality and Social Policy," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 8(4), pages 395-415, August.
    12. Jackson, William A., 2013. "The Desocialising of Economic Theory," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 809-825.
    13. Nathan J. Kelly & Peter K. Enns, 2010. "Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self‐Reinforcing Link Between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 855-870, October.
    14. Alan Shipman, 2004. "Lauding the Leisure Class: Symbolic Content and Conspicuous Consumption," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(3), pages 277-289.
    15. Joseph E. Pluta, 2010. "Evolutionary Alternatives to Equilibrium Economics," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(4), pages 1155-1177, October.
    16. Andrew B. Trigg, 2001. "Veblen, Bourdieu, and Conspicuous Consumption," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 99-115, March.
    17. John E. Elliott & Barry S. Clark, 1989. "Richard Henry Tawney on the Democratic Economy," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(3), pages 44-58, March.
    18. David Cooper & W.D. McCausland & Ioannis Theodossiou, 2015. "Is unemployment and low income harmful to health? Evidence from Britain," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(1), pages 34-60, March.
    19. Andrew Sayer, 2012. "Capabilities, Contributive Injustice and Unequal Divisions of Labour," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 580-596, November.
    20. William A. Jackson, 2009. "Economics, Culture and Social Theory," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 4082.
    21. Fiona Allon & Guy Redden, 2012. "The Global Financial Crisis And The Culture Of Continual Growth," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 375-390, June.
    22. James Ronald Stanfield, 1995. "Economics, Power and Culture," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-23712-8.
    23. David A. Martin, 1982. "R. H. Tawney as Political Economist," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 535-543, June.
    24. William M. Dugger, 1998. "Against Inequality," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 286-303, June.
    25. Cheyney C. Ryan, 1981. "The Fiends of Commerce: Romantic and Marxist criticisms of classical political economy," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 80-94, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mijs, Jonathan Jan Benjamin, 2019. "The Paradox of Inequality: Income Inequality and Belief in Meritocracy go Hand in Hand," SocArXiv dcr9b, Center for Open Science.
    2. William A. Jackson, 2018. "Strategic Pluralism and Monism in Heterodox Economics," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 50(2), pages 237-251, June.
    3. Jon Wisman, 2011. "Inequality, Social Respectability, Political Power, and Environmental Devastation," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 877-900.
    4. Germán Reyes & Leonardo Gasparini, 2017. "Perceptions of Distributive Justice in Latin America During a Period of Falling Inequality," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0209, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    5. Windsteiger, Lisa, 2022. "The redistributive consequences of segregation and misperceptions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Moorlock, Emily & Dekel-Dachs, Ofer & Stokes, Peter & Larsen, Gretchen, 2023. "Constructing Consumer-Masstige brand relationships in a volatile social reality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    7. Jabłoński Łukasz, 2019. "Inequality in Economics: The Concept, Perception, Types, and Driving Forces," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 27(1), pages 17-43, March.
    8. Andreoli, Francesco & Olivera, Javier, 2020. "Preferences for redistribution and exposure to tax-benefit schemes in Europe," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    9. Drakopoulos, Stavros A., 2022. "The Conceptual Resilience of the Atomistic Individual in Mainstream Economic Rationality," MPRA Paper 112944, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Jackson, William A., 2014. "External Capabilities and the Limits to Social Policy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 125-142.
    11. Zeynep B. Ugur, 2021. "How does Inequality Hamper Subjective Well-being? The Role of Fairness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 377-407, December.
    12. Long, Zhiming & Herrera, Rémy, 2018. "Capital in the twenty-first century in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 153-174.
    13. Heshmati, Almas, 2004. "A Review of Decomposition of Income Inequality," IZA Discussion Papers 1221, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Gwangeun Choi, 2021. "Individuals’ socioeconomic position, inequality perceptions, and redistributive preferences in OECD countries," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 19(2), pages 239-264, June.
    15. Duk Gyoo Kim & Max Riegel, 2022. "Rank versus Inequality—Does Gender Composition Matter?," CESifo Working Paper Series 10109, CESifo.
    16. Javier Olivera, 2015. "Preferences for redistribution in Europe," IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Vivekinan Ashok & Ilyana Kuziemko & Ebonya Washington, 2015. "Support for Redistribution in an Age of Rising Inequality: New Stylized Facts and Some Tentative Explanations," NBER Working Papers 21529, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Nancy Birdsall & Christian J. Meyer, 2015. "The Median is the Message: A Good Enough Measure of Material Wellbeing and Shared Development Progress," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 6(4), pages 343-357, November.
    19. Choi, Gwangeun, 2019. "Revisiting the redistribution hypothesis with perceived inequality and redistributive preferences," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 220-244.
    20. Simone Salotti & Carmine Trecroci, 2018. "Cross-country evidence on the distributional impact of fiscal policy," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(51), pages 5521-5542, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B50 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - General
    • D30 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - General
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:8:y:2015:i:6:p:673-688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.