IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Relationship between debt, R&D and physical investment, evidence from US firm-level data

Listed author(s):
  • Chaoshin Chiao
Registered author(s):

    This paper is motivated by the hypothesis by Hall (1992) who claims that firms prefer to use debt to finance physical investment but not R&D, due to the risky nature of R&D. Employing a dynamic simultaneous approach and R&D Master File, the relationship between debt, R&D and physical investment is reestimated with the full sample and two sub-samples, including firms in all industries, in science-based industries, and in nonscience-based industries, respectively. First, the results show that the contemporary relationship between R&D and physical investment is positively reciprocal, particularly in science-based industries. That is, current R&D positively affects and is positively affected by current physical investment. Second, it is shown that, in (non-)science-based industries, current R&D (raises) lowers current debt and current physical investment raises current debt; and that current debt raises current physical investment and (raises) reduces R&D. In other words, the evidence supports that debt is a resource to finance both physical investment and R&D in nonscience-based industries, but debt is only a resource to finance physical investment but not R&D in science-based industries.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Applied Financial Economics.

    Volume (Year): 12 (2002)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 105-121

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:12:y:2002:i:2:p:105-121
    DOI: 10.1080/09603100110102709
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:12:y:2002:i:2:p:105-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.