IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v7y2020i4p3477-3487.html

Justification of the choice of the concession mechanism for projects economically efficient for the infrastructure owner

Author

Listed:
  • Nikolay I. Dorogov

    (Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Russian Federation)

  • Ivan A. Kapitonov

    (Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Russian Federation)

  • Ivan A. Kapitonov

    (Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation)

Abstract

In modern economic realities, the state is playing an increasingly important part, managing the economy to achieve greater social efficiency. From this standpoint, the crucial aspect of efficient application of the concession mechanism is the selection of project proposals that have socio-economic practicality. The purpose of the paper is to justify the choice of the concession mechanism for projects economically efficient for the infrastructure owner. The authors conclude that upon justifying the choice of the concession mechanism, it is important both to analyse the economic efficiency with the benefit of the best analytical practices of investment management in conjunction with budget efficiency evaluation and to assess the specific risks and probability deviations, factoring in the specifics of projects on creation of public railway infrastructure in order to evaluate and subsequently monitor the comparative advantages of the concession over the state law and other PPP tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikolay I. Dorogov & Ivan A. Kapitonov & Ivan A. Kapitonov, 2020. "Justification of the choice of the concession mechanism for projects economically efficient for the infrastructure owner," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(4), pages 3477-3487, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:7:y:2020:i:4:p:3477-3487
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(60)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/28/Dorogov_Justification_of_the_choice_of_the_concession_mechanism_for_projects_economically_efficient_for_the_infrastructure_owner.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/599
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(60)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Martimort & Flavio Menezes & Myrna Wooders & ELISABETTA IOSSA & DAVID MARTIMORT, 2015. "The Simple Microeconomics of Public-Private Partnerships," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 17(1), pages 4-48, February.
    2. Marina RUDENKO, 2018. "Mechanisms for Development and Realization of Economic Capacity of the Regional Population from the Perspective of Sociocultural Approach," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 9(2), pages 645-663.
    3. repec:srs:journl:jarle:v:8:y:2017:i:8:p:2629-2635 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Bent Flyvbjerg, 2014. "What You Should Know About Megaprojects, and Why: An Overview," Papers 1409.0003, arXiv.org.
    5. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-01109351 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. lena ZATSARINNYI & Natalya MALYKH & Yulia SEVERINA & Angelica GENDON & Anna MINNULLINA & Kostyantyn MALYSHENKO, 2017. "Current Trends in the Financial Market Development," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(8), pages 2629-2635.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takano, Guillermo, 2017. "Public-Private Partnerships as rent-seeking opportunities: A case study on an unsolicited proposal in Lima, Peru," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 184-194.
    2. Dimas de Castro e Silva Neto & Carlos Oliveira Cruz & Joaquim Miranda Sarmento, 2017. "Understanding the patterns of PPP renegotiations for infrastructure projects in Latin America," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 18(3-4), pages 271-296, September.
    3. Chen, Zhenhua & Daito, Nobuhiko & Gifford, Jonathan L., 2017. "Socioeconomic impacts of transportation public-private partnerships: A dynamic CGE assessment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 80-87.
    4. Bertolini, Marina & Buso, Marco & Greco, Luciano, 2020. "Competition in smart distribution grids," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Minsoo Lee & Xuehui Han & Raymond Gaspar & Emmanuel Alano, 2018. "Deriving Macroeconomic Benefits from Public–Private Partnerships in Developing Asia," Working Papers id:12888, eSocialSciences.
    6. Schreiner, Lena & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Investing in power grid infrastructure as a flexibility option: A DSGE assessment for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    7. Giovanni Esposito & Andrea Terlizzi & François Pichault, 2024. "The Panopticon reloaded: A critical analysis of performance management systems in the trans-European transport network policy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(3), pages 476-498, May.
    8. MacDonald, Peter, 2013. "Labour substitution and the scope for military outsourcing," MPRA Paper 46688, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Walker, Benedikt & Klagge, Britta & Haid, Ravn, 2025. "Spatial planning policies for export-oriented green-hydrogen projects in Chile, Namibia, and South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. Yukari Fukuda & Jun-ichi Nakamura, 2021. "Economic Analysis of Public-Private Partnerships in Japan: Theoretical and Empirical Analyses Focusing on Adverse Selection and Synergy Effect," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 17(2), pages 1-27, November.
    11. Anna Matas & Ginés de Rus & Stef Proost & Salvador Bertoméu-Sánchez & Antonio Estache, 2018. "The Financing of Infrastructure / La financiación de las infraestructuras / El finançament de les infraestructures," IEB Reports ieb_report_1_2018, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    12. Tianxiao Zhou & Rong Tan & Thomas Sedlin, 2018. "Planning Modes for Major Transportation Infrastructure Projects (MTIPs): Comparing China and Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, September.
    13. Alexander Budzier & Bent Flyvbjerg & Andi Garavaglia & Andreas Leed, 2019. "Quantitative Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis of Nuclear Waste Storage," Papers 1901.11123, arXiv.org.
    14. Hoppe, Eva I. & Kusterer, David J. & Schmitz, Patrick W., 2013. "Public–private partnerships versus traditional procurement: An experimental investigation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 145-166.
    15. Csereklyei, Zsuzsanna & Thurner, Paul W. & Bauer, Alexander & Küchenhoff, Helmut, 2016. "The effect of economic growth, oil prices, and the benefits of reactor standardization: Duration of nuclear power plant construction revisited," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 49-59.
    16. Chen, Bin R. & Chiu, Y. Stephen, 2010. "Public-private partnerships: Task interdependence and contractibility," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 591-603, November.
    17. Crystal COLE, 2017. "Project Management Evolution to Improve Success in Infrastructure Projects," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(4), pages 619-640, December.
    18. Francesco Di Maddaloni & Roya Derakhshan, 2019. "A Leap from Negative to Positive Bond. A Step towards Project Sustainability," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, June.
    19. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & M. D. Christodoulou & M. Zottoli, 2024. "Uniqueness Bias: Why It Matters, How to Curb It," Papers 2408.07710, arXiv.org.
    20. Zheng Wang & John S. Heywood & Guangliang Ye, 2020. "Optimal mixed ownership: A contract view," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 45-68, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General
    • H10 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - General
    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:7:y:2020:i:4:p:3477-3487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.