IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v32y2018i11d10.1007_s11269-018-2015-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Objective Hydraulic Optimization of Diversion Dam’s Cut-Off

Author

Listed:
  • Nafiseh Khoramshokooh

    (Shiraz University)

  • Mehdi Veiskarami

    (Shiraz University)

  • Mohammad Reza Nikoo

    (Shiraz University)

  • Somayeh Pourvahedi Roshandeh

    (University of Guilan)

Abstract

The seepage flow beneath a hydraulic structure is formed by the hydraulic head difference between the upstream and downstream sides. Cut-off walls are often applied, as an expedience, to reduce the seepage flow through the foundation of diversion dams and to enhance the efficiency of these dams. In this research, perhaps for the first time, a novel methodology is propounded to assess the optimum characteristics of cut-off walls in diversion dams in order to ameliorate hydraulic interactions between the diversion dam foundation and the cut-off walls behavior, also their construction cost is minimized. The results are used to train and validate the Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) simulation model. Then MLP, as a meta-model for simulation of the hydraulic behavior of cut-off walls, is coupled with a robust multi-objective optimization algorithm, Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-ΙΙ (NSGA-ΙΙ), to create a trade-off between the intended goals. Finally, Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) decision making model and Nash-Harsanyi bargaining model are utilized to find the compromise design optimal solution on the trade-off curve. Results demonstrate that the best agreed-upon design optimal solution using PROMETHEE and Nash-Harsanyi bargaining models can be considered as (10, 3.84, 32) meters and (2.47, 10, 29.22) meters for optimum depth of the upstream and downstream cut-off walls and the optimum distance between them, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Nafiseh Khoramshokooh & Mehdi Veiskarami & Mohammad Reza Nikoo & Somayeh Pourvahedi Roshandeh, 2018. "Multi-Objective Hydraulic Optimization of Diversion Dam’s Cut-Off," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(11), pages 3723-3736, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:32:y:2018:i:11:d:10.1007_s11269-018-2015-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-018-2015-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-018-2015-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-018-2015-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fausto Cavallaro & University of Molise, 2005. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria System to Assess Sustainable Energy Options: An Application of the Promethee Method," Working Papers 2005.22, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. Nash, John, 1950. "The Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), pages 155-162, April.
    3. John C. Harsanyi & Reinhard Selten, 1972. "A Generalized Nash Solution for Two-Person Bargaining Games with Incomplete Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5-Part-2), pages 80-106, January.
    4. Mohammad Nikoo & Nafise Khorramshokouh & Shahryar Monghasemi, 2015. "Optimal Design of Detention Rockfill Dams Using a Simulation-Based Optimization Approach with Mixed Sediment in the Flow," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(15), pages 5469-5488, December.
    5. Bertrand Mareschal & Jean Pierre Brans & Philippe Vincke, 1984. "Prométhée: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/9305, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Farzin Salmasi & Meysam Nouri & John Abraham, 2020. "Upstream Cutoff and Downstream Filters to Control of Seepage in Dams," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(13), pages 4271-4288, October.
    2. Waqed H. Hassan & Hussein H. Hussein & Duaa H. Khashan & Musa H. Alshammari & Basim K. Nile, 2022. "Application of the Coupled Simulation–optimization Method for the Optimum Cut-off Design Under a Hydraulic Structure," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(12), pages 4619-4636, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roth, Alvin E & Murnighan, J Keith, 1982. "The Role of Information in Bargaining: An Experimental Study," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(5), pages 1123-1142, September.
    2. José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & António Osório & Josep E. Peris, 2015. "From Bargaining Solutions to Claims Rules: A Proportional Approach," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-7, March.
    3. Geoffroy de Clippel & David Perez-Castrillo & David Wettstein, 2010. "Egalitarian Equivalence under Asymmetric Information," Working Papers 2010-5, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    4. de Clippel, Geoffroy & Pérez-Castrillo, David & Wettstein, David, 2012. "Egalitarian equivalence under asymmetric information," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 413-423.
    5. Eric van Damme & Xu Lang, 2022. "Two-Person Bargaining when the Disagreement Point is Private Information," Papers 2211.06830, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    6. Kunter, Marcus, 2012. "Coordination via cost and revenue sharing in manufacturer–retailer channels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 477-486.
    7. R. Harrison Wagner, 1979. "On The Unification of Two-Person Bargaining Theory," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 23(1), pages 71-101, March.
    8. Laruelle, Annick & Valenciano, Federico, 2007. "Bargaining in committees as an extension of Nash's bargaining theory," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 291-305, January.
    9. van Velthoven, Ben & van Winden, Frans, 1985. "Towards a politico-economic theory of social security," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 263-289, March.
    10. Mariotti, Marco, 1996. "Non-optimal Nash Bargaining Solutions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 15-20, July.
    11. Lv, Wei & Li, Hongyi & Tang, Jiafu, 2017. "Bargaining model of labor disputes considering social mediation and bounded rationalityAuthor-Name: Liu, Dehai," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1064-1071.
    12. Forgo, F. & Szidarovszky, F., 2003. "On the relation between the Nash bargaining solution and the weighting method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 108-116, May.
    13. Lippman, Steven A. & McCardle, Kevin F. & Tang, Christopher S., 2013. "Using Nash bargaining to design project management contracts under cost uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 199-207.
    14. Jan Cervenka, 2019. "Bargaining Power: Significance, Structure and Development," ACTA VSFS, University of Finance and Administration, vol. 13(1), pages 79-93.
    15. Binmore, Ken & Osborne, Martin J. & Rubinstein, Ariel, 1992. "Noncooperative models of bargaining," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, in: R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 7, pages 179-225, Elsevier.
    16. Driesen, Bram & Perea, Andrés & Peters, Hans, 2012. "Alternating offers bargaining with loss aversion," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 103-118.
    17. Ronghuo Zheng & Tinglong Dai & Katia Sycara & Nilanjan Chakraborty, 2016. "Automated Multilateral Negotiation on Multiple Issues with Private Information," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 612-628, November.
    18. Joan Esteban & József Sákovics, 2002. "Endogenous bargaining power," Economics Working Papers 644, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    19. Mehrdad Ghorbani Mooselu & Mohammad Reza Nikoo & Nooshin Bakhtiari Rayani & Azizallah Izady, 2019. "Fuzzy Multi-Objective Simulation-Optimization of Stepped Spillways Considering Flood Uncertainty," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(7), pages 2261-2275, May.
    20. Youngsub Chun, 2001. "The Separability Principle in Bargaining," Working Paper Series no43, Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:32:y:2018:i:11:d:10.1007_s11269-018-2015-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.