IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v179y2025i1d10.1007_s11205-025-03577-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring “High-Quality Development” and Progress Toward “Common Prosperity” in China

Author

Listed:
  • Junlai Zhang

    (Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU)
    Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University)

  • Simiao Chen

    (Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University
    Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College)

  • Klaus Prettner

    (Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU))

Abstract

In 2017, the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China introduced the concept of “high-quality development” to shift China’s focus from high-speed growth to a more inclusive concept. In August 2021, the Chinese leadership emphasized “common prosperity” as an essential goal for modernization. However, measuring “common prosperity” in the context of “high-quality development” is challenging and requires reliable and practical indicators. Apart from income, such indicators should include other important aspects of human well-being and they should be easy to calculate and interpret. To this end, we build on recent research and use Lifetime Income (LI), Inequality-Adjusted Lifetime Income (ILI), Healthy Lifetime Income (HLI), and Inequality-Adjusted Healthy Lifetime Income (IHLI) for the first time to assess China’s performance. We calculate the four indicators for China for the period 1990 to 2019 at a national level and employ the ILI indicator at a provincial level for the years 1998, 2008, and 2018. In addition, we calculate the LI indicator for all 31 of Mainland China’s provinces for the years 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020. Compared with other indicators such as the Human Development Index, the measures we use: (i) take into account health and equality as important components of well-being; (ii) have a mathematically defined unit of measurement that allows for a straightforward interpretation; (iii) do not depend on arbitrary weights; (iv) are able to capture tradeoffs that follow directly from their definitions; (v) are not mathematically bounded from above; and (vi) come with limited data requirements. We show that progress towards “common prosperity” was remarkable from 1990 to 2020, but there is still substantial inequality across Chinese provinces. Finally, we discuss several policy measures that could foster “common prosperity”.

Suggested Citation

  • Junlai Zhang & Simiao Chen & Klaus Prettner, 2025. "Measuring “High-Quality Development” and Progress Toward “Common Prosperity” in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 153-200, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:179:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03577-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03577-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-025-03577-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-025-03577-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:179:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03577-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.