IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reihed/v65y2024i3d10.1007_s11162-023-09754-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning to Collaborate in a Project-based Graduate Course: A Multilevel Study of Student Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Mette Mari Wold Johnsen

    (Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

  • Ela Sjølie

    (Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

  • Vegard Johansen

    (Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

The context of this study is an interdisciplinary project-based course at a large public university in Scandinavia. The course is taught annually to 3,300 graduate students from all fields of study, and learning to collaborate is a specified learning objective. Similar courses are widespread in higher education institutions worldwide, and empirical evidence of their impacts on students’ skill development is needed. This study examined students’ collaboration skill outcomes; whether outcomes vary by gender, academic achievement, field of study, course format (accelerated and semester based); and variations in outcomes across student groups and course classes. We used a pretest-posttest design in which 89% of students answered a self-report questionnaire about collaboration skills. The results indicate that the participating students’ interdisciplinary, interpersonal, and conflict management skills improved significantly from the beginning to the end of the course (p 0.4). We also found that the accelerated course format positively influenced the students’ conflict management skill outcomes and that the variability in the students’ overall collaboration outcomes was related to their student group (not their course classes). Another important takeaway from our study is that the students’ gender, academic achievement, and field of study showed little impact on their collaboration skills. The non-significance of the measured individual characteristics and the significance of the student group for students’ collaboration outcomes are important reminders for teachers in higher education to guide and support both their students’ learning and group processes in project-based courses.

Suggested Citation

  • Mette Mari Wold Johnsen & Ela Sjølie & Vegard Johansen, 2024. "Learning to Collaborate in a Project-based Graduate Course: A Multilevel Study of Student Outcomes," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 65(3), pages 439-462, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:65:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11162-023-09754-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11162-023-09754-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11162-023-09754-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11162-023-09754-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theres Konrad & Arnim Wiek & Matthias Barth, 2021. "Learning to Collaborate from Diverse Interactions in Project-Based Sustainability Courses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Schlösser, Thomas & Dunning, David & Johnson, Kerri L. & Kruger, Justin, 2013. "How unaware are the unskilled? Empirical tests of the “signal extraction” counterexplanation for the Dunning–Kruger effect in self-evaluation of performance," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 85-100.
    3. Robert J. Calin-Jageman & Geoff Cumming, 2019. "The New Statistics for Better Science: Ask How Much, How Uncertain, and What Else Is Known," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(S1), pages 271-280, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin Heslop & Kylie Bailey & Jonathan Paul & Elizabeth Stojanovski, 2018. "The PILAR Model as a Measure of Peer Ratings of Collaboration Viability in Small Groups," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Feld, Jan & Sauermann, Jan & de Grip, Andries, 2017. "Estimating the relationship between skill and overconfidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 18-24.
    3. Peter J. Baldacchino & Chantelle Camilleri & Simon Grima & Frank H. Bezzina, 2017. "Assessing Incentive and Monitoring Schemes in the Corporate Governance of Maltese Co-operatives," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 177-195.
    4. Markku Maula & Wouter Stam, 2020. "Enhancing Rigor in Quantitative Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(6), pages 1059-1090, November.
    5. Brookins, Philip & Lucas, Adriana & Ryvkin, Dmitry, 2014. "Reducing within-group overconfidence through group identity and between-group confidence judgments," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-12.
    6. Grabiszewski, Konrad & Horenstein, Alex, 2020. "Effort is not a monotonic function of skills: Results from a global mobile experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 634-652.
    7. Rui Zhang & Ji Shi & Jianwei Zhang, 2023. "Research on the Quality of Collaboration in Project-Based Learning Based on Group Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Kawamura, Tetsuya & Mori, Tomoharu & Motonishi, Taizo & Ogawa, Kazuhito, 2021. "Is Financial Literacy Dangerous? Financial Literacy, Behavioral Factors, and Financial Choices of Households," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Dunkel, Curtis S. & Nedelec, Joseph & van der Linden, Dimitri, 2023. "Reevaluating the Dunning-Kruger effect: A response to and replication of Gignac and Zajenkowski (2020)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Bruce Hewitson & Katinka Waagsaether & Jan Wohland & Kate Kloppers & Teizeen Kara, 2017. "Climate information websites: an evolving landscape," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(5), September.
    11. Semmelmann, Leo & Konermann, Marie & Dietze, Daniel & Staudt, Philipp, 2024. "Empirical field evaluation of self-consumption promoting regulation of household battery energy storage systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    12. Na Li & Ping Jiang & Cuihong Li & Wei Wang, 2022. "College Teaching Innovation from the Perspective of Sustainable Development: The Construction and Twelve-Year Practice of the 2P3E4R System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Shakina, Elena & Volkova, Natalia V. & Paklina, Sofia, 2024. "Perceived worth of human capital across IT jobseekers in the digital era," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    14. Leonid Tiokhin & Minhua Yan & Thomas J. H. Morgan, 2021. "Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(7), pages 857-867, July.
    15. Jan R. Magnus & Anatoly A. Peresetsky, 2021. "A statistical explanation of the Dunning-Kruger effect," Working Papers w0286, New Economic School (NES).
    16. Ingrid Taylor & Pia Bing‐Jonsson & Sigrid Wangensteen & Elisabeth Finnbakk & Leiv Sandvik & Brendan McCormack & Lisbeth Fagerström, 2020. "The self‐assessment of clinical competence and the need for further training: A cross‐sectional survey of advanced practice nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 545-555, February.
    17. Meeran, Sheik & Goodwin, Paul & Yalabik, Baris, 2016. "A parsimonious explanation of observed biases when forecasting one’s own performance," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 112-120.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:65:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11162-023-09754-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.