IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reaccs/v17y2012i3d10.1007_s11142-012-9189-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hedge commitments and agency costs of debt: evidence from interest rate protection covenants and accounting conservatism

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Beatty

    (The Ohio State University)

  • Reining Petacchi

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Haiwen Zhang

    (The Ohio State University)

Abstract

We provide large sample evidence that credible hedge commitments reduce the agency costs of debt and that accounting conservatism enhances hedge commitments. We examine 2,338 bank loans entered into by 263 mandatory derivative users that are contractually obligated by interest rate protection covenants, 709 voluntary derivative users, and 1,366 non-users. We show that loan contracts are more likely to include interest rate protection covenants when borrowers are less likely to maintain the hedge position once the financing is completed. We find that borrowers who credibly commit to hedge using these covenants significantly reduce their interest rates. While we do not find an average interest savings for voluntary derivative users, we do find a reduction in their loan rates when they practice conservative financial reporting. Our results suggest that accounting conservatism helps borrowers resolve shareholder-creditor conflicts by committing to maintain their hedge positions after completing debt financing.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Beatty & Reining Petacchi & Haiwen Zhang, 2012. "Hedge commitments and agency costs of debt: evidence from interest rate protection covenants and accounting conservatism," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 700-738, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:17:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s11142-012-9189-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11142-012-9189-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-012-9189-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11142-012-9189-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:17:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s11142-012-9189-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.