IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pubtra/v12y2020i3d10.1007_s12469-020-00243-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stated-preference intercept survey of transit-rider response to service disruptions

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua Auld

    (University of Chicago)

  • Hubert Ley

    (University of Chicago)

  • Omer Verbas

    (University of Chicago)

  • Nima Golshani

    (Georgia Institute of Technology)

  • Josiane Bechara

    (National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago)

  • Angela Fontes

    (National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago)

Abstract

A web-based intercept survey was designed and implemented in order to capture the response of transit riders in the Chicago metropolitan area to a variety of service disruptions. Current transit riders were intercepted in the field from November 2017 through January 2018, according to a sampling plan based on local ridership information, in order to gain a representative sample for analysis. Each participant completed a questionnaire regarding the intercepted trip, along with demographic and travel experience information. The survey included a series of stated-preference responses where the current trip is randomly disrupted and alternative travel modes are proposed with service characteristics randomly altered from a baseline scenario. This was designed to understand individual trade-offs between various mode alternatives and travel plan modification strategies under a variety of scenarios. Altogether, 659 transit riders gave responses to 2626 different disruption scenarios. In general, a plurality of riders (49%) choose to continue using transit, either waiting for service restoration or using agency-provided shuttle service, although at a decreasing rate as the travel delay increases. Fewer riders, approximately 15%, choose to alter their activity patterns altogether, while 26% would alter their travel to use either a taxi or an alternative transportation network company (TNC). Having a more detailed understanding of the behavior of riders under various disruption scenarios should allow transit agencies to better prepare for service recovery and restoration after and during local disruptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua Auld & Hubert Ley & Omer Verbas & Nima Golshani & Josiane Bechara & Angela Fontes, 2020. "A stated-preference intercept survey of transit-rider response to service disruptions," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 557-585, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:12:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s12469-020-00243-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s12469-020-00243-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12469-020-00243-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12469-020-00243-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Exel, N.J.A. & Rietveld, P., 2009. "When strike comes to town... anticipated and actual behavioural reactions to a one-day, pre-announced, complete rail strike in the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 526-535, June.
    2. André Duarte & Camila Garcia & Grigoris Giannarakis & Susana Limão & Amalia Polydoropoulou & Nikolaos Litinas, 2010. "New approaches in transportation planning: happiness and transport economics," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 5-32, April.
    3. Jin, Jian Gang & Tang, Loon Ching & Sun, Lijun & Lee, Der-Horng, 2014. "Enhancing metro network resilience via localized integration with bus services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 17-30.
    4. Anastasia Pnevmatikou & Matthew Karlaftis & Konstantinos Kepaptsoglou, 2015. "Metro service disruptions: how do people choose to travel?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 933-949, November.
    5. Alexander Kiefer & Stefanie Kritzinger & Karl F. Doerner, 2016. "Disruption management for the Viennese public transport provider," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 161-183, September.
    6. Yap, M.D. & Nijënstein, S. & van Oort, N., 2018. "Improving predictions of public transport usage during disturbances based on smart card data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 84-95.
    7. Wen Hua & Ghim Ping Ong, 2018. "Effect of information contagion during train service disruption for an integrated rail-bus transit system," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 571-594, December.
    8. Federico Malucelli & Emanuele Tresoldi, 2019. "Delay and disruption management in local public transportation via real-time vehicle and crew re-scheduling: a case study," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Nadjla Ghaemi & Oded Cats & Rob M. P. Goverde, 2017. "Railway disruption management challenges and possible solution directions," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 343-364, July.
    10. Yingying Xing & Jian Lu & Shengdi Chen & Sunanda Dissanayake, 2017. "Vulnerability analysis of urban rail transit based on complex network theory: a case study of Shanghai Metro," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 501-525, October.
    11. Antonio Candelieri & Bruno G. Galuzzi & Ilaria Giordani & Francesco Archetti, 2019. "Vulnerability of public transportation networks against directed attacks and cascading failures," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 27-49, June.
    12. Eberlein, Xu Jun & Wilson, Nigel H. M. & Barnhart, Cynthia & Bernstein, David, 1998. "The real-time deadheading problem in transit operations control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 77-100, February.
    13. Arnold Barnett, 1974. "On Controlling Randomness in Transit Operations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 102-116, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liping Ge & Stefan Voß & Lin Xie, 2022. "Robustness and disturbances in public transport," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 191-261, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liping Ge & Stefan Voß & Lin Xie, 2022. "Robustness and disturbances in public transport," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 191-261, March.
    2. Åse Jevinger & Jan A. Persson, 2019. "Exploring the potential of using real-time traveler data in public transport disturbance management," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 413-441, August.
    3. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Q. & Currie, Graham & De Gruyter, Chris & Young, William, 2018. "Transit user reactions to major service withdrawal – A behavioural study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 29-37.
    4. Ali Shahabi & Sadigh Raissi & Kaveh Khalili-Damghani & Meysam Rafei, 2021. "Designing a resilient skip-stop schedule in rapid rail transit using a simulation-based optimization methodology," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1691-1721, September.
    5. Noguchi, Hiroki & Fuse, Masaaki, 2020. "Rethinking critical node problem for railway networks from the perspective of turn-back operation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 558(C).
    6. Lin, Teddy & Shalaby, Amer & Miller, Eric, 2016. "Transit User Behaviour in Response to Service Disruption: State of Knowledge," 57th Transportation Research Forum (51st CTRF) Joint Conference, Toronto, Ontario, May 1-4, 2016 319263, Transportation Research Forum.
    7. Wen Hua & Ghim Ping Ong, 2018. "Effect of information contagion during train service disruption for an integrated rail-bus transit system," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 571-594, December.
    8. Spyropoulou, Ioanna, 2020. "Impact of public transport strikes on the road network: The case of Athens," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 651-665.
    9. Zhu, Weihua & Liu, Kai & Wang, Ming & Yan, Xiaoyong, 2018. "Enhancing robustness of metro networks using strategic defense," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 1081-1091.
    10. Parkes, Stephen D. & Jopson, Ann & Marsden, Greg, 2016. "Understanding travel behaviour change during mega-events: Lessons from the London 2012 Games," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 104-119.
    11. Eva König, 2020. "A review on railway delay management," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 335-361, June.
    12. Erfan Hassannayebi & Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi & Mohammad Reza Amin-Naseri & Masoud Yaghini, 2018. "Optimizing headways for urban rail transit services using adaptive particle swarm algorithms," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 23-62, May.
    13. Kuo, Yong-Hong & Leung, Janny M.Y. & Yan, Yimo, 2023. "Public transport for smart cities: Recent innovations and future challenges," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1001-1026.
    14. Gkiotsalitis, K. & Cats, O., 2021. "At-stop control measures in public transport: Literature review and research agenda," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    15. Chen, Jinqu & Liu, Jie & Peng, Qiyuan & Yin, Yong, 2022. "Resilience assessment of an urban rail transit network: A case study of Chengdu subway," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 586(C).
    16. Wang, Yihui & Zhao, Kangqi & D’Ariano, Andrea & Niu, Ru & Li, Shukai & Luan, Xiaojie, 2021. "Real-time integrated train rescheduling and rolling stock circulation planning for a metro line under disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 87-117.
    17. Federico Malucelli & Emanuele Tresoldi, 2019. "Delay and disruption management in local public transportation via real-time vehicle and crew re-scheduling: a case study," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, June.
    18. Jiangang Shi & Shiping Wen & Xianbo Zhao & Guangdong Wu, 2019. "Sustainable Development of Urban Rail Transit Networks: A Vulnerability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.
    19. Li, Binbin & Yao, Enjian & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki & Tang, Ying & Liu, Shasha, 2020. "Exploring behavioral heterogeneities of metro passenger’s travel plan choice under unplanned service disruption with uncertainty," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 294-306.
    20. Kizhakkedath, A. & Tai, K., 2021. "Vulnerability analysis of critical infrastructure network," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:12:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s12469-020-00243-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.