IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pubtra/v10y2018i1d10.1007_s12469-016-0147-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing headways for urban rail transit services using adaptive particle swarm algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Erfan Hassannayebi

    (Tarbiat Modares University)

  • Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi

    (Tarbiat Modares University)

  • Mohammad Reza Amin-Naseri

    (Tarbiat Modares University)

  • Masoud Yaghini

    (Iran University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Minimizing the passenger waiting times is an important aim of the rail companies to improve the service efficiency. The present study contributes to this aim by: (1) presenting novel mixed-integer nonlinear programming formulations for the train timetabling problem, (2) designing efficient algorithms to solve large instances of the problem. The model addresses the strict vehicle capacity constraint and the period-dependent arrival rate and alighting ratio. The basic model is then improved by embedding heuristic rules in the mathematical formulation. Due to the complexity of the problem, the sizes of the instances solved optimally are small and not practical for the real implementation. In order to tackle large-sized problem instances, different adaptive particle swarm algorithms are proposed. The solution methods are experimentally evaluated with respect to the real instances suggested by Tehran Metropolitan rail. The results demonstrate that the proposed adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithms could reduce the total passenger waiting times significantly compared to the current practice of using an even-headway timetable as well as the baseline schedule. For the given case study, the performance of the proposed adaptive particle swarm algorithm is about 9.4% and 64% better than the quality of the baseline timetable and the regular headway schedule, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Erfan Hassannayebi & Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi & Mohammad Reza Amin-Naseri & Masoud Yaghini, 2018. "Optimizing headways for urban rail transit services using adaptive particle swarm algorithms," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 23-62, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:10:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s12469-016-0147-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s12469-016-0147-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12469-016-0147-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12469-016-0147-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Kabasakal & Aziz Kutlar & Murat Sarikaya, 2015. "Efficiency determinations of the worldwide railway companies via DEA and contributions of the outputs to the efficiency and TFP by panel regression," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 23(1), pages 69-88, March.
    2. Qing Wu & Colin Cole & Tim McSweeney, 2016. "Applications of particle swarm optimization in the railway domain," International Journal of Rail Transportation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 167-190, August.
    3. Cordone, Roberto & Redaelli, Francesco, 2011. "Optimizing the demand captured by a railway system with a regular timetable," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 430-446, February.
    4. Jin, Jian Gang & Tang, Loon Ching & Sun, Lijun & Lee, Der-Horng, 2014. "Enhancing metro network resilience via localized integration with bus services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 17-30.
    5. Niu, Huimin & Zhou, Xuesong & Gao, Ruhu, 2015. "Train scheduling for minimizing passenger waiting time with time-dependent demand and skip-stop patterns: Nonlinear integer programming models with linear constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 117-135.
    6. Beirão, Gabriela & Sarsfield Cabral, J.A., 2007. "Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 478-489, November.
    7. Yu-Ting Zhu & Bao-Hua Mao & Lu Liu & Ming-Gao Li, 2015. "Timetable Design for Urban Rail Line with Capacity Constraints," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-11, August.
    8. Enrique Castillo & Inmaculada Gallego & José Ureña & José Coronado, 2009. "Timetabling optimization of a single railway track line with sensitivity analysis," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 17(2), pages 256-287, December.
    9. Flamini, Marta & Pacciarelli, Dario, 2008. "Real time management of a metro rail terminus," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 746-761, September.
    10. Sels, P. & Dewilde, T. & Cattrysse, D. & Vansteenwegen, P., 2016. "Reducing the passenger travel time in practice by the automated construction of a robust railway timetable," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 124-156.
    11. Eberlein, Xu Jun & Wilson, Nigel H. M. & Barnhart, Cynthia & Bernstein, David, 1998. "The real-time deadheading problem in transit operations control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 77-100, February.
    12. Carlo Mannino & Alessandro Mascis, 2009. "Optimal Real-Time Traffic Control in Metro Stations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(4), pages 1026-1039, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali Shahabi & Sadigh Raissi & Kaveh Khalili-Damghani & Meysam Rafei, 2021. "Designing a resilient skip-stop schedule in rapid rail transit using a simulation-based optimization methodology," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1691-1721, September.
    2. Xue, Hongjiao & Jia, Limin & Li, Jian & Guo, Jianyuan, 2022. "Jointly optimized demand-oriented train timetable and passenger flow control strategy for a congested subway line under a short-turning operation pattern," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 593(C).
    3. Huanhuan Lv & Yuzhao Zhang & Kang Huang & Xiaotong Yu & Jianjun Wu, 2019. "An Energy-Efficient Timetable Optimization Approach in a Bi-DirectionUrban Rail Transit Line: A Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Khattak, Afaq & Hussain, Arshad, 2021. "Hybrid DES-PSO framework for the design of commuters’ circulation space at multimodal transport interchange," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 205-229.
    5. Andrea Gemma & Ernesto Cipriani & Umberto Crisalli & Livia Mannini & Marco Petrelli, 2024. "A Bus Network Design Model under Demand Variation: A Case Study of the Management of Rome’s Bus Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Shahabi & Sadigh Raissi & Kaveh Khalili-Damghani & Meysam Rafei, 2021. "Designing a resilient skip-stop schedule in rapid rail transit using a simulation-based optimization methodology," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1691-1721, September.
    2. Wang, Yihui & D’Ariano, Andrea & Yin, Jiateng & Meng, Lingyun & Tang, Tao & Ning, Bin, 2018. "Passenger demand oriented train scheduling and rolling stock circulation planning for an urban rail transit line," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 193-227.
    3. Limsawasd, Charinee & Athigakunagorn, Nathee & Khathawatcharakun, Phattadon & Boonmee, Atiwat, 2022. "Skip-Stop Strategy Patterns optimization to enhance mass transit operation under physical distancing policy due to COVID-19 pandemic outbreak," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 225-238.
    4. Joshua Auld & Hubert Ley & Omer Verbas & Nima Golshani & Josiane Bechara & Angela Fontes, 2020. "A stated-preference intercept survey of transit-rider response to service disruptions," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 557-585, October.
    5. Gkiotsalitis, K. & Alesiani, F., 2019. "Robust timetable optimization for bus lines subject to resource and regulatory constraints," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 30-51.
    6. Xie, J. & Wong, S.C. & Zhan, S. & Lo, S.M. & Chen, Anthony, 2020. "Train schedule optimization based on schedule-based stochastic passenger assignment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    7. Chen, Zebin & Li, Shukai & D’Ariano, Andrea & Yang, Lixing, 2022. "Real-time optimization for train regulation and stop-skipping adjustment strategy of urban rail transit lines," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    8. Jiateng Yin & Lixing Yang & Andrea D’Ariano & Tao Tang & Ziyou Gao, 2022. "Integrated Backup Rolling Stock Allocation and Timetable Rescheduling with Uncertain Time-Variant Passenger Demand Under Disruptive Events," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3234-3258, November.
    9. Yin, Jiateng & Yang, Lixing & Tang, Tao & Gao, Ziyou & Ran, Bin, 2017. "Dynamic passenger demand oriented metro train scheduling with energy-efficiency and waiting time minimization: Mixed-integer linear programming approaches," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 182-213.
    10. Sartor, Giorgio & Mannino, Carlo & Nygreen, Thomas & Bach, Lukas, 2023. "A MILP model for quasi-periodic strategic train timetabling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. Wenliang Zhou & Wenzhuang Fan & Xiaorong You & Lianbo Deng, 2019. "Demand-Oriented Train Timetabling Integrated with Passenger Train-Booking Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-34, September.
    12. Jiang, Feng & Cacchiani, Valentina & Toth, Paolo, 2017. "Train timetabling by skip-stop planning in highly congested lines," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 149-174.
    13. Han Zheng & Junhua Chen & Zhaocha Huang & Jianhao Zhu, 2022. "Joint Optimization of Multi-Cycle Timetable Considering Supply-to-Demand Relationship and Energy Consumption for Rail Express," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-29, November.
    14. Chen, Jingxu & Liu, Zhiyuan & Zhu, Senlai & Wang, Wei, 2015. "Design of limited-stop bus service with capacity constraint and stochastic travel time," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-15.
    15. Cacchiani, Valentina & Qi, Jianguo & Yang, Lixing, 2020. "Robust optimization models for integrated train stop planning and timetabling with passenger demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1-29.
    16. Yang, Xin & Chen, Anthony & Ning, Bin & Tang, Tao, 2017. "Bi-objective programming approach for solving the metro timetable optimization problem with dwell time uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 22-37.
    17. Zhang, Ping & Sun, Huijun & Qu, Yunchao & Yin, Haodong & Jin, Jian Gang & Wu, Jianjun, 2021. "Model and algorithm of coordinated flow controlling with station-based constraints in a metro system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    18. David Canca & Eva Barrena & Gilbert Laporte & Francisco A. Ortega, 2016. "A short-turning policy for the management of demand disruptions in rapid transit systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 145-166, November.
    19. Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper & Bull, Simon, 2018. "A survey on robustness in railway planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 1-15.
    20. Gao, Yuan & Kroon, Leo & Schmidt, Marie & Yang, Lixing, 2016. "Rescheduling a metro line in an over-crowded situation after disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 425-449.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:10:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s12469-016-0147-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.