IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v16y2023i2d10.1007_s12063-023-00346-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of innovative technology enablers and drone technology determinants adoption: a graph theory matrix analysis framework

Author

Listed:
  • Sadia Samar Ali

    (King Abdulaziz University)

  • Rajbir Kaur

    (Govt Girls College)

  • Shahbaz Khan

    (GLA University)

Abstract

Two main things ensure technology is integrated into a system: enablers, which help technology get in; and determinants, which act as filters to ensure that the right technology gets in. The study develops a decision framework for ranking determinants of drone technology adoption from the perspective of enablers related to innovative technology integration. This study is based on qualitative expert opinion and quantitative integrated MCDM methods. It provides a valuable graph theory matrix analysis framework for managerial perspectives. Several insights are given into the areas of what makes it possible to use new technologies and what makes people adopt drone technology. The study also points out problems and places where more research is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadia Samar Ali & Rajbir Kaur & Shahbaz Khan, 2023. "Identification of innovative technology enablers and drone technology determinants adoption: a graph theory matrix analysis framework," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 830-852, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:16:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s12063-023-00346-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-023-00346-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-023-00346-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-023-00346-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Jing, You-Yin & Zhang, Chun-Fa & Zhao, Jun-Hong, 2009. "Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2263-2278, December.
    2. Ram Khilari & Om Prakash Wali & Rajesh K. Singh, 2022. "Identification and prioritisation of technology management practices for enhancing competitiveness of auto components manufacturing firms in India," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 36(1), pages 65-94.
    3. Anchal Gupta & Rajesh Kr Singh & Shivam Gupta, 2021. "Developing human resource for the digitization of logistics operations: readiness index framework," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 43(2), pages 355-379, September.
    4. Avimanyu Datta, 2011. "An Integrative Model to Explain the Ability to Commercialize Innovations: Linking Networks, Absorptive Capacity, Ambidexterity and Environmental Factors," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(2), pages 2-22, June.
    5. Cali Nuur & Linda Gustavsson & Staffan Laestadius, 2009. "Promoting Regional Innovation Systems in a Global Context," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 123-139.
    6. Markard, Jochen & Truffer, Bernhard, 2008. "Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 596-615, May.
    7. Aydin, Burchan, 2019. "Public acceptance of drones: Knowledge, attitudes, and practice," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    9. Kevin Zhu & Shutao Dong & Sean Xin Xu & Kenneth L Kraemer, 2006. "Innovation diffusion in global contexts: determinants of post-adoption digital transformation of European companies," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(6), pages 601-616, December.
    10. John Gambatese & Matthew Hallowell, 2011. "Enabling and measuring innovation in the construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 553-567.
    11. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    12. Shahbaz Khan & Rubee Singh & Abid Haleem & Jacinta Dsilva & Sadia Samar Ali, 2022. "Exploration of Critical Success Factors of Logistics 4.0: A DEMATEL Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, February.
    13. Dubey, Rameshwar & Bryde, David J. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Graham, Gary & Foropon, Cyril, 2022. "Impact of artificial intelligence-driven big data analytics culture on agility and resilience in humanitarian supply chain: A practice-based view," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    14. Niels Agatz & Paul Bouman & Marie Schmidt, 2018. "Optimization Approaches for the Traveling Salesman Problem with Drone," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 965-981, August.
    15. Raphael Amit & Paul J. H. Schoemaker, 1993. "Abstract," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 33-46, January.
    16. Gabriela Viale Pereira & Marie Anne Macadar & Edimara M. Luciano & Maurício Gregianin Testa, 2017. "Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City context," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 213-229, April.
    17. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    18. Dan Andrews & Chiara Criscuolo, 2013. "Knowledge-Based Capital, Innovation and Resource Allocation," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1046, OECD Publishing.
    19. Marc Gruber & Ian C. MacMillan & James D. Thompson, 2008. "Look Before You Leap: Market Opportunity Identification in Emerging Technology Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(9), pages 1652-1665, September.
    20. Jain, Vineet & Raj, Tilak, 2016. "Modeling and analysis of FMS performance variables by ISM, SEM and GTMA approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 84-96.
    21. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    22. Schot, Johan & Steinmueller, W. Edward, 2018. "Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1554-1567.
    23. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    24. Aditya Kamat & Saket Shanker & Akhilesh Barve & Kamalakanta Muduli & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Sunil Luthra, 2022. "Uncovering interrelationships between barriers to unmanned aerial vehicles in humanitarian logistics," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1134-1160, December.
    25. Manoj Hudnurkar & Suhas Suresh Ambekar, 2019. "Framework for measurement of supplier satisfaction," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 68(8), pages 1475-1492, June.
    26. Fatima Zahra Barrane & Gahima Egide Karuranga & Diane Poulin, 2018. "Technology Adoption and Diffusion: A New Application of the UTAUT Model," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-19, December.
    27. Geels, Frank W., 2002. "Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8-9), pages 1257-1274, December.
    28. Zhong, Weiguo & Peng, Jisheng & Liu, Chunlin, 2013. "Internationalization performance of Chinese multinational companies in the developed markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2479-2484.
    29. Ola Söderström & Till Paasche & Francisco Klauser, 2014. "Smart cities as corporate storytelling," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 307-320, June.
    30. Leif Denti & Sven Hemlin, 2012. "Leadership And Innovation In Organizations: A Systematic Review Of Factors That Mediate Or Moderate The Relationship," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 1-20.
    31. ., 2009. "Designing the R&D system of innovation," Chapters, in: Creating Value through Innovation, chapter 7, pages 128-162, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    32. Mavis Chen & Carol Lin & Hsing-Er Lin & Edward McDonough, 2012. "Does transformational leadership facilitate technological innovation? The moderating roles of innovative culture and incentive compensation," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 239-264, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Singh, Shiwangi & Dhir, Sanjay & Das, V. Mukunda & Sharma, Anuj, 2020. "Bibliometric overview of the Technological Forecasting and Social Change journal: Analysis from 1970 to 2018," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Eleonora Bartoloni & Alessandro Arrighetti & Fabio Landini, 2021. "Recession and firm survival: is selection based on cleansing or skill accumulation?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1893-1914, December.
    3. Zhao, Nanyang & Hong, Jiangtao & Lau, Kwok Hung, 2023. "Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Sick, Nathalie & Bröring, Stefanie, 2022. "Exploring the research landscape of convergence from a TIM perspective: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Mikko Henrik Hirvonen, 2022. "The Pyramid Model: Conceptualizing an Organizational Capability to Design IT Investments," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Nhat Strøm-Andersen, 2019. "Incumbents in the Transition Towards the Bioeconomy: The Role of Dynamic Capabilities and Innovation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Gliga, Gabriela & Evers, Natasha, 2023. "Marketing capability development through networking – An entrepreneurial marketing perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    8. Thomas Magnusson & Viktor Werner, 2023. "Conceptualisations of incumbent firms in sustainability transitions: Insights from organisation theory and a systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 903-919, February.
    9. Oliver Krätzig & Valeria Franzkowiak & Nathalie Sick, 2019. "Multi-Level Perspective To Facilitate Sustainable Transitions — A Pathway For German Oems Towards Electric Vehicles," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(08), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Maribel Guerrero & David Urbano & Fernando Herrera, 2019. "Innovation practices in emerging economies: Do university partnerships matter?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 615-646, April.
    11. André de Abreu Saraiva Monteiro Alves & Fernando Manuel Pereira de Oliveira Carvalho, 2022. "How Dynamic Managerial Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Operational Capabilities Impact Microenterprises’ Global Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Claudio Vitari & Elisabetta Raguseo, 2016. "Big data value and financial performance: an empirical investigation [Digital data, dynamic capability and financial performance: an empirical investigation in the era of Big Data]," Post-Print halshs-01923271, HAL.
    13. Jim Andersén, 2023. "Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5506-5520, December.
    14. Zhang-Zhang, YingYing & Rohlfer, Sylvia & Varma, Arup, 2022. "Strategic people management in contemporary highly dynamic VUCA contexts: A knowledge worker perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 587-598.
    15. Insu Cho & Young Hoon Kwak & Jaehyeon Jun, 2019. "Sustainable Idea Development Mechanism in University Technology Commercialization (UTC): Perspectives from Dynamic Capabilities Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Terrien, Clara & Maniak, Rémi & Chen, Bo & Shaheen, Susan, 2016. "Good Practices for Advancing Urban Mobility Innovation: A Case Study of One-Way Carsharing," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt53z3h2gt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    17. Abel D Alonso & Seng Kok, 2018. "A resource-based view and dynamic capabilities approach in the context of a region’s international attractiveness: The recent case of Western Australia," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(3), pages 307-328, May.
    18. Schriber, Svante & Löwstedt, Jan, 2015. "Tangible resources and the development of organizational capabilities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 54-68.
    19. Patrizia Pastore & Antonio Ricciardi & Silvia Tommaso, 2020. "Contractual networks: an organizational model to reduce the competitive disadvantage of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Europe’s less developed regions. A survey in southern Italy," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1503-1535, December.
    20. Cleverton Rodrigues Fernandes & André Gustavo Carvalho Machado, 2019. "Technology Transfer Capability: development dynamics in higher education institutions," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:16:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s12063-023-00346-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.