IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i6d10.1007_s11069-024-07096-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dempster-Shafer theory in emergency management: a review

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Li

    (Shandong University
    Shandong University)

  • Jiayi Sun

    (Shandong University
    Shandong University)

  • Liguo Fei

    (Shandong University
    Shandong University)

Abstract

The increasing complexity and uncertainty of global disaster challenges highlight the critical need for effective information fusion in emergency management. Dempster-Shafer theory (DST), a powerful tool for information fusion, has gained widespread application in this field. This study conducts a literature review to assess the potential of DST in emergency management. First, we identified key terms such as DST and emergency management, and selected relevant literature according to predefined review criteria. A quantitative analysis is then performed on the literature, examining authors, institutions, and keywords. This study outlines the purpose and scope of DST, focusing on its application in emergency management and summarizing key methods. Additionally, the contributions of DST in information fusion for emergency management are discussed, along with its limitations and future research directions. Our findings demonstrate that DST, as a tool for processing uncertain information, enhances scientific and accurate decision-making in emergency management. However, several challenges remain unresolved. This paper reviews the current state of DST applications, highlights research gaps, and proposes future directions. By analysing how DST and its variations address different emergency scenarios, this study aims to provide insights for improving the efficiency and accuracy of emergency management.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Li & Jiayi Sun & Liguo Fei, 2025. "Dempster-Shafer theory in emergency management: a review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(6), pages 6413-6440, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s11069-024-07096-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-07096-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-07096-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-07096-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meizhi Jiang & Jing Lu, 2020. "Maritime accident risk estimation for sea lanes based on a dynamic Bayesian network," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 649-664, July.
    2. Min Wang & Jiaxing Wang, 2024. "Performance Evaluation of Urban Emergency Governance: Conceptual Connotations and Empirical Research Based on the Crisis Life Cycle Theory," Evaluation Review, , vol. 48(5), pages 945-974, October.
    3. Sacchelli, S. & Fabbrizzi, S., 2015. "Minimisation of uncertainty in decision-making processes using optimised probabilistic Fuzzy Cognitive Maps: A case study for a rural sector," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 31-40.
    4. Jun-Ping Qiu & Ke Dong & Hou-Qiang Yu, 2014. "Comparative study on structure and correlation among author co-occurrence networks in bibliometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1345-1360, November.
    5. Bing Wu & Junhui Zhang & Tsz Leung Yip & C. Guedes Soares, 2021. "A quantitative decision-making model for emergency response to oil spill from ships," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 299-315, April.
    6. Linpei Zhai & Jae Eun Lee, 2023. "Analyzing the Disaster Preparedness Capability of Local Government Using AHP: Zhengzhou 7.20 Rainstorm Disaster," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Beynon, Malcolm & Curry, Bruce & Morgan, Peter, 2000. "The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: an alternative approach to multicriteria decision modelling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 37-50, February.
    8. Ahmed M. Al-Wathinani & Dennis G. Barten & Marta Borowska-Stefańska & Paweł Gołda & Noora A. AlDulijan & Mohammad A. Alhallaf & Lujain O. Samarkandi & Abdullah S. Almuhaidly & Mariusz Goniewicz & Wale, 2023. "Driving Sustainable Disaster Risk Reduction: A Rapid Review of the Policies and Strategies in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Meizhi & Lu, Jing, 2020. "The analysis of maritime piracy occurred in Southeast Asia by using Bayesian network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Yu-Wei Chang & Mu-Hsuan Huang & Chiao-Wen Lin, 2015. "Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 2071-2087, December.
    3. Grilli, Gianluca & Fratini, Roberto & Marone, Enrico & Sacchelli, Sandro, 2020. "A spatial-based tool for the analysis of payments for forest ecosystem services related to hydrogeological protection," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. Hongyi Sun & Wenbin Ni & Pee-Lee Teh & Amrik Sohal, 2025. "An agent-mediated and entrepreneurship-oriented model for assessing high technology transfer," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 19-38, March.
    5. Li, Siran & Xiao, Fuyuan, 2023. "Normal distribution based on maximum Deng entropy," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Arpit Singh & Ashish Dwivedi & Dindayal Agrawal & Anurag Chauhan, 2024. "A framework to model the performance indicators of resilient construction supply chain: An effort toward attaining sustainability and circular practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1688-1720, March.
    7. Wang, Ying-Ming & Yang, Jian-Bo & Xu, Dong-Ling & Chin, Kwai-Sang, 2006. "The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 35-66, November.
    8. Hakan Saraç, 2024. "Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on the Digital Nomad with VOSviewer," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, issue 87, pages 58-68, December.
    9. Fan, Hanwen & Jia, Haiying & He, Xuzhuo & Lyu, Jing, 2024. "Navigating uncertainty: A dynamic Bayesian network-based risk assessment framework for maritime trade routes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    10. Kangas, Annika S. & Kangas, Jyrki, 2004. "Probability, possibility and evidence: approaches to consider risk and uncertainty in forestry decision analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 169-188, March.
    11. Blanca De-Miguel-Molina & Scott W. Cunningham & Fernando Palop, 2017. "Analyzing Funding Patterns and Their Evolution in Two Medical Research Topics," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(02), pages 1-39, April.
    12. Yan, Lisen & Peng, Jun & Gao, Dianzhu & Wu, Yue & Liu, Yongjie & Li, Heng & Liu, Weirong & Huang, Zhiwu, 2022. "A hybrid method with cascaded structure for early-stage remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    13. Yang, J.B. & Wang, Y.M. & Xu, D.L. & Chin, K.S., 2006. "The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(1), pages 309-343, May.
    14. Justin Moskolaï Ngossaha & Raymond Houé Ngouna & Bernard Archimède & Mihaela-Hermina Negulescu & Alexandru-Ionut Petrişor, 2024. "Toward Sustainable Urban Mobility: A Multidimensional Ontology-Based Framework for Assessment and Consensus Decision-Making Using DS-AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Emanuele Salerno, 2020. "Identifying Value-Increasing Actions for Cultural Heritage Assets through Sensitivity Analysis of Multicriteria Evaluation Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-13, November.
    16. Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan & Dumrak, Jantanee, 2021. "Unearthing vulnerability of supply provision in logistics networks to the black swan events: Applications of entropy theory and network analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    17. S. Nodoust & A. Mirzazadeh & G.-W. Weber, 2020. "An evidential reasoning approach for production modeling with deteriorating and ameliorating items," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Zhang, Yifan & Shu, Gang & Li, Ya, 2017. "Strategy-updating depending on local environment enhances cooperation in prisoner’s dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 301(C), pages 224-232.
    19. Lei Chen & Ling Diao & Jun Sang, 2019. "A novel weighted evidence combination rule based on improved entropy function with a diagnosis application," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(1), pages 15501477188, January.
    20. Beynon, Malcolm J., 2005. "Understanding local ignorance and non-specificity within the DS/AHP method of multi-criteria decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(2), pages 403-417, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s11069-024-07096-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.