IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/manrev/v74y2024i2d10.1007_s11301-023-00330-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food and social media: a research stream analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Areli García-León

    (University of Hamburg)

  • Thorsten Teichert

    (University of Hamburg)

Abstract

Interest in food and online communication is growing fast among marketing and business scholars. Nevertheless, this interest has been not exclusive to these areas. Researchers from different disciplines have focused their research on different concepts, target populations, approaches, methodologies, and theoretical backgrounds, making this growing body of knowledge richer, but at the same time difficult to analyze. In order to have a broader overview of this topic, this study analyzes the existent literature regarding food and social media in social sciences in order to identify the main research streams and themes explored. With this purpose, the present paper uses bibliometric methods to analyze 1356 journal articles by means of factor and social network analysis. The study contributes by revealing 4 clusters containing 11 dominant research streams within the social sciences, determining the linkages among the main research discourses, and recommending new future topics of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Areli García-León & Thorsten Teichert, 2024. "Food and social media: a research stream analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 1145-1183, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:manrev:v:74:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11301-023-00330-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11301-023-00330-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11301-023-00330-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11301-023-00330-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ladislav Pilař & Lucie Kvasničková Stanislavská & Jana Pitrová & Igor Krejčí & Ivana Tichá & Martina Chalupová, 2019. "Twitter Analysis of Global Communication in the Field of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Ying Yang & Mingzhi Wu & Lei Cui, 2012. "Integration of three visualization methods based on co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(2), pages 659-673, February.
    3. Yi Li & Xiuxiu Xu & Bo Song & Hong He, 2020. "Impact of Short Food Videos on the Tourist Destination Image—Take Chengdu as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Simon, Adam F. & Xenos, Michael, 2004. "Dimensional Reduction of Word-Frequency Data as a Substitute for Intersubjective Content Analysis," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 63-75, January.
    5. Shimiao Li & Nor Siah Jaharuddin, 2021. "Influences of background factors on consumers’ purchase intention in China’s organic food market: Assessing moderating role of word-of-mouth (WOM)," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1876296-187, January.
    6. Sahand Ashtab & Robert Campbell, 2021. "Explanatory Analysis of Factors Influencing the Support for Sustainable Food Production and Distribution Systems: Results from a Rural Canadian Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    7. Leigh Martindale, 2021. "‘I will know it when I taste it’: trust, food materialities and social media in Chinese alternative food networks," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(2), pages 365-380, June.
    8. Chunhua Niu & Zhixin Jiang & Hongbing Liu & Kehu Yang & Xuping Song & Zhihong Li, 2022. "The influence of media consumption on public risk perception: a meta-analysis," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 21-47, January.
    9. S. Ravikumar & Ashutosh Agrahari & S. N. Singh, 2015. "Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: a co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005–2010)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 929-955, January.
    10. Anna Elizabeth Coates & Charlotte Alice Hardman & Jason Christian Grovenor Halford & Paul Christiansen & Emma Jane Boyland, 2020. "“It’s Just Addictive People That Make Addictive Videos” : Children’s Understanding of and Attitudes towards Influencer Marketing of Food and Beverages by YouTube Video Bloggers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Chunmei Gan & Weijun Wang, 2015. "Research characteristics and status on social media in China: A bibliometric and co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 1167-1182, November.
    12. Mangold, W. Glynn & Faulds, David J., 2009. "Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 357-365, July.
    13. Datis Khajeheian & Amir Mohammad Colabi & Nordiana Binti Ahmad Kharman Shah & Che Wan Jasimah Bt Wan Mohamed Radzi & Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi, 2018. "Effect of Social Media on Child Obesity: Application of Structural Equation Modeling with the Taguchi Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Susanne Kummer & Rebecka Milestad, 2020. "The Diversity of Organic Box Schemes in Europe—An Exploratory Study in Four Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Kuntner, Tobias & Teichert, Thorsten, 2016. "The scope of price promotion research: An informetric study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2687-2696.
    16. Faheem Bukhari & Saima Hussain & Rizwan Raheem Ahmed & Dalia Streimikiene & Riaz Hussain Soomro & Zahid Ali Channar, 2020. "Motives and Role of Religiosity towards Consumer Purchase Behavior in Western Imported Food Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, January.
    17. Loet Leydesdorff & Ping Zhou, 2008. "Co‐word analysis using the Chinese character set," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(9), pages 1528-1530, July.
    18. Olga Bogolyubova & Philipp Upravitelev & Anastasia Churilova & Yanina Ledovaya, 2018. "Expression of Psychological Distress on Instagram Using Hashtags in Russian and English: A Comparative Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, November.
    19. Leydesdorff, Loet & Welbers, Kasper, 2011. "The semantic mapping of words and co-words in contexts," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 469-475.
    20. Bei-Ni Yan & Tian-Shyug Lee & Tsung-Pei Lee, 2015. "Mapping the intellectual structure of the Internet of Things (IoT) field (2000–2014): a co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 1285-1300, November.
    21. R. Filieri & D. Yen & Q. Yu, 2021. "#ILoveLondon: An exploration of the declaration of love towards a destination on Instagram," Post-Print hal-04779111, HAL.
    22. Leydesdroff, Loet, 1989. "Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 209-223, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sung Kim & Derek Hansen & Richard Helps, 2018. "Computing research in the academy: insights from theses and dissertations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(1), pages 135-158, January.
    2. Seyedmohammadreza Hosseini & Hamed Baziyad & Rasoul Norouzi & Sheida Jabbedari Khiabani & Győző Gidófalvi & Amir Albadvi & Abbas Alimohammadi & Seyedehsan Seyedabrishami, 2021. "Mapping the intellectual structure of GIS-T field (2008–2019): a dynamic co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 2667-2688, April.
    3. Aliakbar Pourhatami & Mohammad Kaviyani-Charati & Bahareh Kargar & Hamed Baziyad & Maryam Kargar & Carlos Olmeda-Gómez, 2021. "Mapping the intellectual structure of the coronavirus field (2000–2020): a co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6625-6657, August.
    4. Chen, Guo & Hong, Siqi & Du, Chenxin & Wang, Panting & Yang, Zeyu & Xiao, Lu, 2024. "Comparing semantic representation methods for keyword analysis in bibliometric research," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3).
    5. Faraji, Omid & Ezadpour, Mostafa & Rahrovi Dastjerdi, Alireza & Dolatzarei, Ehsan, 2022. "Conceptual structure of balanced scorecard research: A co-word analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Hao Wang & Sanhong Deng & Xinning Su, 2016. "A study on construction and analysis of discipline knowledge structure of Chinese LIS based on CSSCI," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1725-1759, December.
    7. S. Lozano & L. Calzada-Infante & B. Adenso-Díaz & S. García, 2019. "Complex network analysis of keywords co-occurrence in the recent efficiency analysis literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(2), pages 609-629, August.
    8. García-Lillo, Francisco & Seva-Larrosa, Pedro & Sánchez-García, Eduardo, 2024. "On the basis of research on ‘green’ in the disciplines of management and business," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    9. Matteo Lascialfari & Marie-Benoît Magrini & Guillaume Cabanac, 2022. "Unpacking research lock-in through a diachronic analysis of topic cluster trajectories in scholarly publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6165-6189, November.
    10. Yang, Siluo & Han, Ruizhen & Wolfram, Dietmar & Zhao, Yuehua, 2016. "Visualizing the intellectual structure of information science (2006–2015): Introducing author keyword coupling analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 132-150.
    11. Carlos Olmeda-Gómez & Maria-Antonia Ovalle-Perandones & Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez, 2017. "Co-word analysis and thematic landscapes in Spanish information science literature, 1985–2014," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 195-217, October.
    12. Patrick Kenekayoro & Kevan Buckley & Mike Thelwall, 2015. "Clustering research group website homepages," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2023-2039, March.
    13. García-Lillo, Francisco & Seva-Larrosa, Pedro & Sánchez-García, Eduardo, 2023. "What is going on in entrepreneurship research? A bibliometric and SNA analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Manuel Castriotta & Maria Chiara Guardo, 2016. "Disentangling the automotive technology structure: a patent co-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(2), pages 819-837, May.
    15. Edison Jair Duque Oliva & Pedro Duque, 2022. "Tendencias emergentes en la literatura sobre el compromiso del cliente: un análisis bibliométrico," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 38(162), pages 120-132, March.
    16. Qikai Cheng & Jiamin Wang & Wei Lu & Yong Huang & Yi Bu, 2020. "Keyword-citation-keyword network: a new perspective of discipline knowledge structure analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 1923-1943, September.
    17. Manuel Castriotta & Michela Loi & Elona Marku & Luca Naitana, 2019. "What’s in a name? Exploring the conceptual structure of emerging organizations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(2), pages 407-437, February.
    18. Zhu, Lin & Cunningham, Scott W., 2022. "Unveiling the knowledge structure of technological forecasting and social change (1969–2020) through an NMF-based hierarchical topic model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    19. Mahan, Joseph E. & Seo, Won Jae & Jordan, Jeremy S. & Funk, Daniel, 2015. "Exploring the impact of social networking sites on running involvement, running behavior, and social life satisfaction," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 182-192.
    20. María Pinto & Rosaura Fernández-Pascual & David Caballero-Mariscal & Dora Sales, 2020. "Information literacy trends in higher education (2006–2019): visualizing the emerging field of mobile information literacy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1479-1510, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Food; Social-media; Word-of-mouth; Social-network-analysis; Text-mining; e-WOM;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:manrev:v:74:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11301-023-00330-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.