IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jtrsec/v16y2023i1d10.1007_s12198-023-00262-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study to assess the applicability of using remote sensing to minimize service interruption of Canadian port physical infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Heather Holden

    (Carleton University)

  • Maha Hussein Abdallah

    (Carleton University)

  • Dane Rowlands

    (Carleton University)

Abstract

Remote sensing can be an effective tool for providing early warning of structural deterioration that is difficult or impossible to detect with visual inspections, which can allow infrastructure owners and operators to prioritize key areas for maintenance and assist in more rapid recovery from incidents that cause service interruptions. Canadian Port Authorities (CPAs) do not currently use remote sensing techniques to assess the condition of physical infrastructure despite their application to similar operations such as bridges, pipelines, and dams. Interviews with key informants indicate that there are no technical or scientific barriers to using remote sensing to assess port physical infrastructure, and that while the presence of heterogeneous materials and surfaces, restricted air space, and a complex web of interconnected port partners and tenants complicates its use, these are surmountable. Instead, interviews suggest that the primary barrier stopping CPAs from implementing remote sensing is that there is no system-wide formal chain of responsibility and authority due to a lack of public sector agency leadership resulting from the commonly used “landlord model” for port operations, which generates fragmented stakeholder interests and inhibits collaboration. Given the emerging challenges of aging infrastructure, climate change-related impacts, and the demands of system-wide business continuity, a private and public sector collaborative pilot project is needed to test the feasibility of adopting remote sensing for port physical infrastructure assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Heather Holden & Maha Hussein Abdallah & Dane Rowlands, 2023. "A study to assess the applicability of using remote sensing to minimize service interruption of Canadian port physical infrastructure," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jtrsec:v:16:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12198-023-00262-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12198-023-00262-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12198-023-00262-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12198-023-00262-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheng-Hsien Hsieh & Hui-Huang Tai & Yang-Ning Lee, 2014. "Port vulnerability assessment from the perspective of critical infrastructure interdependency," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 589-606, November.
    2. Cao, Xinhu & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "A fast reaction-based port vulnerability assessment: Case of Tianjin Port explosion," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 11-33.
    3. Chung-Shan Yang, 2019. "Investigating UAVs applications and intention to use in the maritime shipping in Taiwan," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(8), pages 982-994, November.
    4. Yonas Zewdu Ayele & Mostafa Aliyari & David Griffiths & Enrique Lopez Droguett, 2020. "Automatic Crack Segmentation for UAV-Assisted Bridge Inspection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Shital A. Thekdi & Joost R. Santos, 2016. "Supply Chain Vulnerability Analysis Using Scenario‐Based Input‐Output Modeling: Application to Port Operations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(5), pages 1025-1039, May.
    6. Walker, Tony R. & Bernier, Meagan & Blotnicky, Brenden & Golden, Peter G. & Hoffman, Emma & Janes, Jeffrey & Kader, Allison & Kovacs-Da Costa, Rachel & Pettipas, Shauna & Vermeulen, Sarah, 2015. "Harbour divestiture in Canada: Implications of changing governance," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1-8.
    7. Hui Shan Loh & Vinh V. Thai, 2016. "Managing port-related supply chain disruptions (PSCDs): a management model and empirical evidence," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 436-455, May.
    8. Patrick Verhoeven, 2010. "A review of port authority functions: towards a renaissance?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 247-270, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Nanxi & Wu, Min & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Assessment of port resilience using Bayesian network: A study of strategies to enhance readiness and response capacities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Hossain, Niamat Ullah Ibne & Nur, Farjana & Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Jaradat, Raed & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Puryear, Stephen M., 2019. "A Bayesian network based approach for modeling and assessing resilience: A case study of a full service deep water port," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 378-396.
    3. Zhen, Lu & Lin, Shumin & Zhou, Chenhao, 2022. "Green port oriented resilience improvement for traffic-power coupled networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    4. Xueni Gou & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam, 2019. "Risk analysis of marine cargoes and major port disruptions," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 21(4), pages 497-523, December.
    5. Behzad Behdani & Bart Wiegmans & Violeta Roso & Hercules Haralambides, 2020. "Port-hinterland transport and logistics: emerging trends and frontier research," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Zhang, Qiang & Zheng, Shiyuan & Geerlings, Harry & El Makhloufi, Abdel, 2019. "Port governance revisited: How to govern and for what purpose?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 46-57.
    7. Marion Magnan & Martijn Horst, 2020. "Involvement of port authorities in inland logistics markets: the cases of Rotterdam, Le Havre and Marseille," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 102-123, March.
    8. Di Vaio, Assunta & Varriale, Luisa & Alvino, Federico, 2018. "Key performance indicators for developing environmentally sustainable and energy efficient ports: Evidence from Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 229-240.
    9. Stanislav Shmelev & Harrison Roger Brook, 2021. "Macro Sustainability across Countries: Key Sector Environmentally Extended Input-Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-46, October.
    10. Assunta Di Vaio & Luisa Varriale, 2018. "Management Innovation for Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: Managerial Accounting Instruments and Training for Competitive Green Ports beyond the Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-35, March.
    11. de Langen, P.W. & Heij, C., 2013. "Performance Effects of the Corporatisation of Port of Rotterdam Authority," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2013-06, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    12. Yingjie Fan & Frank Schwartz & Stefan Voß & David L. Woodruff, 2017. "Stochastic programming for flexible global supply chain planning," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 601-633, December.
    13. Theo Notteboom & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam, 2018. "The Greening of Terminal Concessions in Seaports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Valenza, Giuseppe & Damiano, Rodolfo, 2023. "Sustainability reporting and public value: Evidence from port authorities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Yang, Yi-Chih & Ge, Ying-En, 2020. "Adaptation strategies for port infrastructure and facilities under climate change at the Kaohsiung port," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 232-244.
    16. Marcello Risitano & Francesco Parola & Alessandra Turi & Marco Ferretti, 2017. "Green practices in port authority management: A multiple case study," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(3), pages 127-145.
    17. HOSSAIN, Niamat Ullah Ibne & Amrani, Safae El & Jaradat, Raed & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Buchanan, Randy & Rinaudo, Christina & Hamilton, Michael, 2020. "Modeling and assessing interdependencies between critical infrastructures using Bayesian network: A case study of inland waterway port and surrounding supply chain network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    18. Shilin Ye & Xinhua Qi & Yecheng Xu, 2020. "Analyzing the relative efficiency of China’s Yangtze River port system," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 640-660, December.
    19. Parola, Francesco & Pallis, Athanasios A. & Risitano, Marcello & Ferretti, Marco, 2018. "Marketing strategies of Port Authorities: A multi-dimensional theorisation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 199-212.
    20. Jasper Verschuur & Raghav Pant & Elco Koks & Jim Hall, 2022. "A systemic risk framework to improve the resilience of port and supply-chain networks to natural hazards," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(3), pages 489-506, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jtrsec:v:16:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12198-023-00262-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.