IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jorgde/v11y2022i4d10.1007_s41469-022-00125-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health crisis and the EU’s HERA: amplifying partial organizing with resourcing for stability, agility, and evolvability

Author

Listed:
  • Liisa Välikangas

    (Technical University of Denmark, DTU Management)

  • Marijane Luistro-Jonsson

    (Stockholm School of Economics, Department of Marketing)

  • Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa

    (University of Texas)

Abstract

What design recommendations can be made for European Union (EU) organizing its health crisis preparedness and emergency response? The EU has recently established the Health Emergency Response and Health Authority (HERA) for coping with crises. However, as an international organization that lacks a legal means of extending its mandate over EU member states, HERA can potentially fail in its mission. To help prevent this potential failure, we make design recommendations that draw on resourcing theory to complement the limited—or partial—organizing capabilities of HERA. The design recommendations are tailored to three schemas that the analysis of the stakeholder feedback suggests: stability, agility, and evolvability. We outline HERA’s current actions and deliverables as mandated in its founding and suggest additional examples of ways to amplify crisis preparedness and emergency response. These recommendations stem from the proposed resourcing perspective within the constraints of an international, partial organization. We conclude with implications for future research and practice, focusing on how stability, agility and evolvability can amplify the HERA’s ability to meet its expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Liisa Välikangas & Marijane Luistro-Jonsson & Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa, 2022. "Health crisis and the EU’s HERA: amplifying partial organizing with resourcing for stability, agility, and evolvability," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 11(4), pages 169-187, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jorgde:v:11:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s41469-022-00125-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s41469-022-00125-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41469-022-00125-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41469-022-00125-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer Howard-Grenville & Karen Golden-Biddle & Jennifer Irwin & Jina Mao, 2011. "Liminality as Cultural Process for Cultural Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 522-539, April.
    2. Ahrne, Göran & Brunsson, Nils, 2005. "Organizations and meta-organizations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 429-449, December.
    3. Eero Vaara & Scott Sonenshein & David Boje, 2016. "Narratives as Sources of Stability and Change in Organizations : Approaches and Directions for Future Research," Post-Print hal-02313402, HAL.
    4. Tammy E. Beck & Donde Ashmos Plowman, 2014. "Temporary, Emergent Interorganizational Collaboration in Unexpected Circumstances: A Study of the Columbia Space Shuttle Response Effort," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1234-1252, August.
    5. Ryan W. Quinn & Monica C. Worline, 2008. "Enabling Courageous Collective Action: Conversations from United Airlines Flight 93," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 497-516, August.
    6. Elena Dalpiaz & Giada Di Stefano, 2018. "A universe of stories: Mobilizing narrative practices during transformative change," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 664-696, March.
    7. Speakman, Elizabeth M. & Burris, Scott & Coker, Richard, 2017. "Pandemic legislation in the European Union: Fit for purpose? The need for a systematic comparison of national laws," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(10), pages 1021-1024.
    8. Eero Vaara & Scott Sonenshein & David Boje, 2016. "Narratives as Sources of Stability and Change in Organizations : Approaches and Directions for Future Research," Post-Print hal-02276673, HAL.
    9. Ann Majchrzak & Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa & Andrea B. Hollingshead, 2007. "Coordinating Expertise Among Emergent Groups Responding to Disasters," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 147-161, February.
    10. Martin Kornberger & Stephan Leixnering & Renate E. Meyer, 2019. "The logic of tact : How decisions happen in situations of crisis," Post-Print hal-02312257, HAL.
    11. Gwendolyn K. Lee & Joseph Lampel & Zur Shapira, 2020. "After the Storm Has Passed: Translating Crisis Experience into Useful Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1037-1051, July.
    12. Héloïse Berkowitz & Hervé Dumez, 2015. "How firms (partially) organize their environment : Meta-organizations in the oil and gas industry," Working Papers hal-01483012, HAL.
    13. Garud, Raghu & Gehman, Joel, 2012. "Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: Evolutionary, relational and durational," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 980-995.
    14. Natalie Slawinski & Pratima Bansal, 2015. "Short on Time: Intertemporal Tensions in Business Sustainability," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 531-549, April.
    15. Sharma, Amalesh & Borah, Sourav Bikash & Moses, Aditya C., 2021. "Responses to COVID-19: The role of governance, healthcare infrastructure, and learning from past pandemics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 597-607.
    16. Beth A. Bechky, 2003. "Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 312-330, June.
    17. Pamela R. Haunschild & Francisco Polidoro & David Chandler, 2015. "Organizational Oscillation Between Learning and Forgetting: The Dual Role of Serious Errors," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1682-1701, December.
    18. Martha S. Feldman, 2004. "Resources in Emerging Structures and Processes of Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 295-309, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rory McDonald & Cheng Gao, 2019. "Pivoting Isn’t Enough? Managing Strategic Reorientation in New Ventures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1289-1318, November.
    2. Kohtamäki, Marko & Rabetino, Rodrigo & Einola, Suvi & Parida, Vinit & Patel, Pankaj, 2021. "Unfolding the digital servitization path from products to product-service-software systems: Practicing change through intentional narratives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 379-392.
    3. Martha S. Feldman & Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2011. "Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1240-1253, October.
    4. Linda Argote & Ella Miron-Spektor, 2011. "Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1123-1137, October.
    5. Gwendolyn K. Lee & Joseph Lampel & Zur Shapira, 2020. "After the Storm Has Passed: Translating Crisis Experience into Useful Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1037-1051, July.
    6. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    7. Hadjielias, Elias & Christofi, Michael & Tarba, Shlomo, 2021. "Knowledge hiding and knowledge sharing in small family farms: A stewardship view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 279-292.
    8. Ruthanne Huising, 2014. "The Erosion of Expert Control Through Censure Episodes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1633-1661, December.
    9. Luciana D’Adderio, 2014. "The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routine Transfer," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1325-1350, October.
    10. Jeffrey S. Bednar & Benjamin M. Galvin & Blake E. Ashforth & Ella Hafermalz, 2020. "Putting Identification in Motion: A Dynamic View of Organizational Identification," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 200-222, January.
    11. J. Laine, Lauri & Kibler, Ewald, 2018. "Towards a mythic process philosophy of entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 81-86.
    12. Alperen Manisaligil & Ummugulsum Aysan, 2022. "Sustainability Narratives: A Social Constructivist Perspective on Interorganizational Projects," Istanbul Journal of Economics-Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 72(72-2), pages 1001-1024, December.
    13. Mukta Kulkarni, 2024. "Narrating a Prototypical Disabled Employee," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(4), pages 781-796, February.
    14. Natalya Sergeeva & Johan Ninan, 2023. "Comparisons as a discursive tool: shaping megaproject narratives in the United Kingdom," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(2), pages 197-211.
    15. Ilkka Tuomi, 2019. "Chronotopes of foresight: Models of time‐space in probabilistic, possibilistic and constructivist futures," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), June.
    16. de Graaff, Bert & Huizenga, Sabrina & van de Bovenkamp, Hester & Bal, Roland, 2023. "Framing the pandemic: Multiplying “crises” in Dutch healthcare governance during the emerging COVID-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    17. Tomas Casas-Klett & Jiatao Li, 2022. "Assessing the Belt and Road Initiative as a narrative: Implications for institutional change and international firm strategy," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 857-873, September.
    18. Teea Palo, 2023. "The Emergence of Concerned Partnerships in the Ethical Marketization of Place: A Narrative Lens," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(4), pages 835-854, May.
    19. Noella Edelmann & Ines Mergel, 2021. "Co-Production of Digital Public Services in Austrian Public Administrations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Schuler, Benedikt Alexander & Orr, Kevin & Hughes, Jeffrey, 2023. "My colleagues (do not) think the same: Middle managers’ shared and separate realities in strategy implementation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jorgde:v:11:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s41469-022-00125-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.