IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v192y2022i1d10.1007_s10957-021-01971-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Semidefinite Programming with Approximate ADMM

Author

Listed:
  • Nikitas Rontsis

    (University of Oxford)

  • Paul Goulart

    (University of Oxford)

  • Yuji Nakatsukasa

    (University of Oxford)

Abstract

Tenfold improvements in computation speed can be brought to the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) for Semidefinite Programming with virtually no decrease in robustness and provable convergence simply by projecting approximately to the Semidefinite cone. Instead of computing the projections via “exact” eigendecompositions that scale cubically with the matrix size and cannot be warm-started, we suggest using state-of-the-art factorization-free, approximate eigensolvers, thus achieving almost quadratic scaling and the crucial ability of warm-starting. Using a recent result from Goulart et al. (Linear Algebra Appl 594:177–192, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2020.02.014 ), we are able to circumvent the numerical instability of the eigendecomposition and thus maintain tight control on the projection accuracy. This in turn guarantees convergence, either to a solution or a certificate of infeasibility, of the ADMM algorithm. To achieve this, we extend recent results from Banjac et al. (J Optim Theory Appl 183(2):490–519, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-019-01575-y ) to prove that reliable infeasibility detection can be performed with ADMM even in the presence of approximation errors. In all of the considered problems of SDPLIB that “exact” ADMM can solve in a few thousand iterations, our approach brings a significant, up to 20x, speedup without a noticeable increase in ADMM’s iterations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikitas Rontsis & Paul Goulart & Yuji Nakatsukasa, 2022. "Efficient Semidefinite Programming with Approximate ADMM," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 292-320, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:192:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-021-01971-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-021-01971-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-021-01971-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-021-01971-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brendan O’Donoghue & Eric Chu & Neal Parikh & Stephen Boyd, 2016. "Conic Optimization via Operator Splitting and Homogeneous Self-Dual Embedding," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 1042-1068, June.
    2. Michael Garstka & Mark Cannon & Paul Goulart, 2021. "COSMO: A Conic Operator Splitting Method for Convex Conic Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 190(3), pages 779-810, September.
    3. Goran Banjac & Paul Goulart & Bartolomeo Stellato & Stephen Boyd, 2019. "Infeasibility Detection in the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers for Convex Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 490-519, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Garstka & Mark Cannon & Paul Goulart, 2021. "COSMO: A Conic Operator Splitting Method for Convex Conic Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 190(3), pages 779-810, September.
    2. Alberto Marchi, 2022. "On a primal-dual Newton proximal method for convex quadratic programs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 369-395, March.
    3. Andrew Butler & Roy H. Kwon, 2023. "Efficient differentiable quadratic programming layers: an ADMM approach," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 449-476, March.
    4. Enzo Busseti, 2019. "Derivative of a Conic Problem with a Unique Solution," Papers 1903.05753, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2019.
    5. Bernardo Freitas Paulo da Costa & Silvana M. Pesenti & Rodrigo S. Targino, 2023. "Risk Budgeting Portfolios from Simulations," Papers 2302.01196, arXiv.org.
    6. Leo Liberti, 2020. "Distance geometry and data science," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(2), pages 271-339, July.
    7. Johannes Friedrich & Pengcheng Zhou & Liam Paninski, 2017. "Fast online deconvolution of calcium imaging data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Andrew Butler & Roy Kwon, 2021. "Efficient differentiable quadratic programming layers: an ADMM approach," Papers 2112.07464, arXiv.org.
    9. Sun, Qinghe & Chen, Li & Meng, Qiang, 2022. "Evaluating port efficiency dynamics: A risk-based approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 333-347.
    10. Chen, Ying & Koch, Thorsten & Zakiyeva, Nazgul & Zhu, Bangzhu, 2020. "Modeling and forecasting the dynamics of the natural gas transmission network in Germany with the demand and supply balance constraint," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    11. Run Chen & Andrew L. Liu, 2021. "A distributed algorithm for high-dimension convex quadratically constrained quadratic programs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 781-830, December.
    12. Enzo Busseti & Walaa M. Moursi & Stephen Boyd, 2019. "Solution refinement at regular points of conic problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 627-643, December.
    13. Oviedo-Cepeda, J.C. & Serna-Suárez, Ivan & Osma-Pinto, German & Duarte, Cesar & Solano, Javier & Gabbar, Hossam A., 2020. "Design of tariff schemes as demand response mechanisms for stand-alone microgrids planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    14. Zohrizadeh, Fariba & Josz, Cedric & Jin, Ming & Madani, Ramtin & Lavaei, Javad & Sojoudi, Somayeh, 2020. "A survey on conic relaxations of optimal power flow problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 391-409.
    15. da Costa, B. Freitas Paulo & Pesenti, Silvana M. & Targino, Rodrigo S., 2023. "Risk budgeting portfolios from simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 1040-1056.
    16. Richard Spady & Sami Stouli, 2020. "Gaussian Transforms Modeling and the Estimation of Distributional Regression Functions," Papers 2011.06416, arXiv.org.
    17. Florian Schwendinger & Bettina Grün & Kurt Hornik, 2021. "A comparison of optimization solvers for log binomial regression including conic programming," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 1721-1754, September.
    18. Jinhak Kim & Mohit Tawarmalani & Jean-Philippe P. Richard, 2019. "Convexification of Permutation-Invariant Sets," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1315, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
    19. Stephen Boyd & Kasper Johansson & Ronald Kahn & Philipp Schiele & Thomas Schmelzer, 2024. "Markowitz Portfolio Construction at Seventy," Papers 2401.05080, arXiv.org.
    20. Benoît Legat & Oscar Dowson & Joaquim Dias Garcia & Miles Lubin, 2022. "MathOptInterface: A Data Structure for Mathematical Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 672-689, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:192:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-021-01971-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.