IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v74y2019i3d10.1007_s10589-019-00122-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solution refinement at regular points of conic problems

Author

Listed:
  • Enzo Busseti

    (Stanford University)

  • Walaa M. Moursi

    (Stanford University
    Mansoura University)

  • Stephen Boyd

    (Stanford University)

Abstract

Many numerical methods for conic problems use the homogenous primal–dual embedding, which yields a primal–dual solution or a certificate establishing primal or dual infeasibility. Following Themelis and Patrinos (IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2019), we express the embedding as the problem of finding a zero of a mapping containing a skew-symmetric linear function and projections onto cones and their duals. We focus on the special case when this mapping is regular, i.e., differentiable with nonsingular derivative matrix, at a solution point. While this is not always the case, it is a very common occurrence in practice. In this paper we do not aim for new theorerical results. We rather propose a simple method that uses LSQR, a variant of conjugate gradients for least squares problems, and the derivative of the residual mapping to refine an approximate solution, i.e., to increase its accuracy. LSQR is a matrix-free method, i.e., requires only the evaluation of the derivative mapping and its adjoint, and so avoids forming or storing large matrices, which makes it efficient even for cone problems in which the data matrices are given and dense, and also allows the method to extend to cone programs in which the data are given as abstract linear operators. Numerical examples show that the method improves an approximate solution of a conic program, and often dramatically, at a computational cost that is typically small compared to the cost of obtaining the original approximate solution. For completeness we describe methods for computing the derivative of the projection onto the cones commonly used in practice: nonnegative, second-order, semidefinite, and exponential cones. The paper is accompanied by an open source implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Enzo Busseti & Walaa M. Moursi & Stephen Boyd, 2019. "Solution refinement at regular points of conic problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 627-643, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:74:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-019-00122-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-019-00122-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-019-00122-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-019-00122-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Defeng Sun & Jie Sun, 2008. "Löwner's Operator and Spectral Functions in Euclidean Jordan Algebras," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 421-445, May.
    2. Enzo Busseti & Ernest K. Ryu & Stephen Boyd, 2016. "Risk-Constrained Kelly Gambling," Papers 1603.06183, arXiv.org.
    3. Houyuan Jiang, 1999. "Global Convergence Analysis of the Generalized Newton and Gauss-Newton Methods of the Fischer-Burmeister Equation for the Complementarity Problem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 529-543, August.
    4. Stephen Boyd & Enzo Busseti & Steven Diamond & Ronald N. Kahn & Kwangmoo Koh & Peter Nystrup & Jan Speth, 2017. "Multi-Period Trading via Convex Optimization," Papers 1705.00109, arXiv.org.
    5. Brendan O’Donoghue & Eric Chu & Neal Parikh & Stephen Boyd, 2016. "Conic Optimization via Operator Splitting and Homogeneous Self-Dual Embedding," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 1042-1068, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bolte, Jérôme & Le, Tam & Pauwels, Edouard & Silveti-Falls, Antonio, 2022. "Nonsmooth Implicit Differentiation for Machine Learning and Optimization," TSE Working Papers 22-1314, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    2. Andrew Butler & Roy H. Kwon, 2023. "Efficient differentiable quadratic programming layers: an ADMM approach," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 449-476, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholas Moehle & Mykel J. Kochenderfer & Stephen Boyd & Andrew Ang, 2021. "Tax-Aware Portfolio Construction via Convex Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 189(2), pages 364-383, May.
    2. Michael Garstka & Mark Cannon & Paul Goulart, 2021. "COSMO: A Conic Operator Splitting Method for Convex Conic Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 190(3), pages 779-810, September.
    3. Guillermo Angeris & Akshay Agrawal & Alex Evans & Tarun Chitra & Stephen Boyd, 2021. "Constant Function Market Makers: Multi-Asset Trades via Convex Optimization," Papers 2107.12484, arXiv.org.
    4. Andrew Butler & Roy H. Kwon, 2023. "Efficient differentiable quadratic programming layers: an ADMM approach," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 449-476, March.
    5. Xiaoyue Li & A. Sinem Uysal & John M. Mulvey, 2021. "Multi-Period Portfolio Optimization using Model Predictive Control with Mean-Variance and Risk Parity Frameworks," Papers 2103.10813, arXiv.org.
    6. Enzo Busseti, 2019. "Derivative of a Conic Problem with a Unique Solution," Papers 1903.05753, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2019.
    7. da Costa, B. Freitas Paulo & Pesenti, Silvana M. & Targino, Rodrigo S., 2023. "Risk budgeting portfolios from simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 1040-1056.
    8. Bernardo Freitas Paulo da Costa & Silvana M. Pesenti & Rodrigo S. Targino, 2023. "Risk Budgeting Portfolios from Simulations," Papers 2302.01196, arXiv.org.
    9. Andrew Paskaramoorthy & Tim Gebbie & Terence van Zyl, 2021. "The efficient frontiers of mean-variance portfolio rules under distribution misspecification," Papers 2106.10491, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    10. Leo Liberti, 2020. "Distance geometry and data science," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(2), pages 271-339, July.
    11. Richard Spady & Sami Stouli, 2020. "Gaussian Transforms Modeling and the Estimation of Distributional Regression Functions," Papers 2011.06416, arXiv.org.
    12. Shane Barratt & Stephen Boyd, 2020. "Multi-Period Liability Clearing via Convex Optimal Control," Papers 2005.09066, arXiv.org.
    13. Johannes Friedrich & Pengcheng Zhou & Liam Paninski, 2017. "Fast online deconvolution of calcium imaging data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, March.
    14. Hubáček, Ondřej & Šír, Gustav, 2023. "Beating the market with a bad predictive model," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 691-719.
    15. Florian Schwendinger & Bettina Grün & Kurt Hornik, 2021. "A comparison of optimization solvers for log binomial regression including conic programming," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 1721-1754, September.
    16. Andrew Butler & Roy Kwon, 2021. "Efficient differentiable quadratic programming layers: an ADMM approach," Papers 2112.07464, arXiv.org.
    17. M. V. Dolgopolik, 2018. "Augmented Lagrangian functions for cone constrained optimization: the existence of global saddle points and exact penalty property," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 237-296, June.
    18. Jinhak Kim & Mohit Tawarmalani & Jean-Philippe P. Richard, 2019. "Convexification of Permutation-Invariant Sets," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1315, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
    19. Jingyong Tang & Hongchao Zhang, 2021. "A Nonmonotone Smoothing Newton Algorithm for Weighted Complementarity Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 679-715, June.
    20. Y. D. Chen & Y. Gao & Y.-J. Liu, 2010. "An Inexact SQP Newton Method for Convex SC1 Minimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 33-49, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:74:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-019-00122-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.