IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1903.05753.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Derivative of a Conic Problem with a Unique Solution

Author

Listed:
  • Enzo Busseti

Abstract

We view a conic optimization problem that has a unique solution as a map from its data to its solution. If sufficient regularity conditions hold at a solution point, namely that the implicit function theorem applies to the normalized residual function of [Busseti et al., 2018], the problem solution map is differentiable. We obtain the derivative, in the form of an abstract linear operator. This applies to any convex optimization problem in conic form, while a previous result [Amos et al., 2016] studied strictly convex quadratic programs. Such differentiable problems can be used, for example, in machine learning, control, and related areas, as a layer in an end-to-end learning and control procedure, for backpropagation. We accompany this note with a lightweight Python implementation which can handle problems with the cone constraints commonly used in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Enzo Busseti, 2019. "Derivative of a Conic Problem with a Unique Solution," Papers 1903.05753, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2019.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1903.05753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.05753
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yinyu Ye & Michael J. Todd & Shinji Mizuno, 1994. "An O(√nL)-Iteration Homogeneous and Self-Dual Linear Programming Algorithm," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 53-67, February.
    2. Brendan O’Donoghue & Eric Chu & Neal Parikh & Stephen Boyd, 2016. "Conic Optimization via Operator Splitting and Homogeneous Self-Dual Embedding," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 1042-1068, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zohrizadeh, Fariba & Josz, Cedric & Jin, Ming & Madani, Ramtin & Lavaei, Javad & Sojoudi, Somayeh, 2020. "A survey on conic relaxations of optimal power flow problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 391-409.
    2. Andrew Butler & Roy H. Kwon, 2023. "Efficient differentiable quadratic programming layers: an ADMM approach," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 449-476, March.
    3. Luo, Z-Q. & Sturm, J.F. & Zhang, S., 1998. "Conic convex programming and self-dual embedding," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 9815, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    4. da Costa, B. Freitas Paulo & Pesenti, Silvana M. & Targino, Rodrigo S., 2023. "Risk budgeting portfolios from simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 1040-1056.
    5. Bernardo Freitas Paulo da Costa & Silvana M. Pesenti & Rodrigo S. Targino, 2023. "Risk Budgeting Portfolios from Simulations," Papers 2302.01196, arXiv.org.
    6. Leo Liberti, 2020. "Distance geometry and data science," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(2), pages 271-339, July.
    7. Richard Spady & Sami Stouli, 2020. "Gaussian Transforms Modeling and the Estimation of Distributional Regression Functions," Papers 2011.06416, arXiv.org.
    8. Johannes Friedrich & Pengcheng Zhou & Liam Paninski, 2017. "Fast online deconvolution of calcium imaging data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, March.
    9. Florian Schwendinger & Bettina Grün & Kurt Hornik, 2021. "A comparison of optimization solvers for log binomial regression including conic programming," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 1721-1754, September.
    10. Andrew Butler & Roy Kwon, 2021. "Efficient differentiable quadratic programming layers: an ADMM approach," Papers 2112.07464, arXiv.org.
    11. Jinhak Kim & Mohit Tawarmalani & Jean-Philippe P. Richard, 2019. "Convexification of Permutation-Invariant Sets," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1315, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
    12. Mehdi Karimi & Levent Tunçel, 2020. "Primal–Dual Interior-Point Methods for Domain-Driven Formulations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 591-621, May.
    13. Sun, Qinghe & Chen, Li & Meng, Qiang, 2022. "Evaluating port efficiency dynamics: A risk-based approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 333-347.
    14. Chen, Ying & Koch, Thorsten & Zakiyeva, Nazgul & Zhu, Bangzhu, 2020. "Modeling and forecasting the dynamics of the natural gas transmission network in Germany with the demand and supply balance constraint," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    15. Stephen Boyd & Kasper Johansson & Ronald Kahn & Philipp Schiele & Thomas Schmelzer, 2024. "Markowitz Portfolio Construction at Seventy," Papers 2401.05080, arXiv.org.
    16. Badenbroek, Riley & Dahl, Joachim, 2020. "An Algorithm for Nonsymmetric Conic Optimization Inspired by MOSEK," Other publications TiSEM bcf7ef05-e4e6-4ce8-b2e9-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Benoît Legat & Oscar Dowson & Joaquim Dias Garcia & Miles Lubin, 2022. "MathOptInterface: A Data Structure for Mathematical Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 672-689, March.
    18. Run Chen & Andrew L. Liu, 2021. "A distributed algorithm for high-dimension convex quadratically constrained quadratic programs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 781-830, December.
    19. Coralia Cartis & Yiming Yan, 2016. "Active-set prediction for interior point methods using controlled perturbations," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 639-684, April.
    20. Thomas Schmelzer & Raphael Hauser & Erling Andersen & Joachim Dahl, 2013. "Regression techniques for Portfolio Optimisation using MOSEK," Papers 1310.3397, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1903.05753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.