IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joimai/v22y2021i2d10.1007_s12134-020-00774-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Effectiveness of Fence on a Country’s Border: a Case Study of Pak-Afghan Border Fence

Author

Listed:
  • Yousaf Ali

    (Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences & Technology)

  • Asadullah Khan

    (Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences & Technology)

  • Ghani Khan

    (Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences & Technology)

  • Amin Ullah Khan

    (Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences & Technology)

  • Zeeshan Ahmad

    (Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences & Technology)

Abstract

The border fencing has become a hot topic in the world’s current political affairs. At the end of the Cold War, there were only 15 walls all around the world, but now, 70 such barriers are protecting the countries from the terrorists ( https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2018/05/24/border-walls-berlin-wall-donald-trump-wall/553250002/ ), drug cartels, insurgents, or suicide bombers lurking on the other side. For the past two decades, the peace of Pakistan has been extremely deteriorated by the suicide bombers mainly coming from Afghanistan through Pak-Afghan Border. Recently, the government of Pakistan decided to build a border fence around the border. In this study, the effectiveness of this border fencing is determined in terms of its ability to stop terrorism, smuggling, and illegal immigration. The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach such as the fuzzy technique of order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (Fuzzy TOPSIS) is employed to determine the effectiveness of the border to stop terrorism, smuggling, and illegal immigration. The data for this study is collected from the army officers who worked at the Pak-Afghan Border. The results of Fuzzy TOPSIS depict that the most influencing factor is terrorism while the second most affected factor (alternative in this case) is smuggling. The third factor is illegal immigration which has the lowest weightage of importance among all the alternatives. The results of this study can be helpful for countries such as Pakistan that are facing the problems related to terrorism, smuggling, and illegal immigration from the neighboring countries in taking a decision to build border fencing.

Suggested Citation

  • Yousaf Ali & Asadullah Khan & Ghani Khan & Amin Ullah Khan & Zeeshan Ahmad, 2021. "Evaluation of Effectiveness of Fence on a Country’s Border: a Case Study of Pak-Afghan Border Fence," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 769-790, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joimai:v:22:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12134-020-00774-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s12134-020-00774-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12134-020-00774-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12134-020-00774-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gathmann, Christina, 2008. "Effects of enforcement on illegal markets: Evidence from migrant smuggling along the southwestern border," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(10-11), pages 1926-1941, October.
    2. Angela Paparusso & Tineke Fokkema & Elena Ambrosetti, 2017. "Immigration Policies in Italy: Their Impact on the Lives of First-Generation Moroccan and Egyptian Migrants," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 499-546, May.
    3. Yousaf Ali & Zain Aslam & Hammad Sajid Dar & UbaidUllah Mumtaz, 2018. "A multi-criteria decision analysis of solid waste treatment options in Pakistan: Lahore City—a case in point," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 528-543, December.
    4. Mathias Czaika & Hein De Haas, 2013. "The Effectiveness of Immigration Policies," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 39(3), pages 487-508, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuanyuan Chen & Wei Fu, 2023. "Migration control policy and parent–child separation among migrant families: evidence from China," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 2347-2388, October.
    2. Pia Orrenius, 2019. "Enforcement and illegal migration," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 1-81, November.
    3. Matthew Ward & Daniel E Martinez, 2015. "Know Your Enemy: How Unauthorized Repatriated Migrants Learn About and Perceive Anti-Immigrant Mobilization in the United States," Migration Letters, Migration Letters, vol. 12(2), pages 137-151, May.
    4. David, Blight, 2020. "Trends of International Migration since Post-World War II," MPRA Paper 106307, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2020.
    5. Giacomo Battiston, 2022. "Rescue on Stage: Border Enforcement and Public Attention in the Mediterranean Sea," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0292, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    6. Yuji Tamura, 2013. "Migrant smuggling when exploitation is private information," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(4), pages 1463-1479, November.
    7. Khulan Altangerel & Jan van Ours, 2016. "U.S. Immigration Reform and the Dynamics of Mexican Migration," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-043/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    8. Simone Bertoli & Morgane Laouenan & Jérôme Valette, 2022. "Border Apprehensions and Federal Sentencing of Hispanic Citizens in the United States," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03818735, HAL.
    9. Guido Friebel & Sergei Guriev, 2013. "Human smuggling," Chapters, in: Amelie F. Constant & Klaus F. Zimmermann (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Migration, chapter 6, pages 121-134, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Claudio Deiana & Vikram Maheshri & Giovanni Mastrobuoni, 2024. "Migrants at Sea: Unintended Consequences of Search and Rescue Operations," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 16(2), pages 335-365, May.
    11. Klabunde, Anna, 2014. "Computational Economic Modeling of Migration," Ruhr Economic Papers 471, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    12. Mattia Guidi, 2015. "The Impact of Independence on Regulatory Outcomes: the Case of EU Competition Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(6), pages 1195-1213, November.
    13. Joseph-Simon Görlach, 2023. "Borrowing Constraints and the Dynamics of Return and Repeat Migration," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(1), pages 205-243.
    14. Bożena, Chrząstowska, 2018. "The Effectiveness of Migration Policies," MPRA Paper 106128, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2018.
    15. Juan Luis Manfredi-Sánchez, 2020. "Sanctuary Cities: What Global Migration Means for Local Governments," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Omar Mahmoud, Toman & Trebesch, Christoph, 2010. "The economics of human trafficking and labour migration: Micro-evidence from Eastern Europe," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 173-188, June.
    17. Emmanuelle Auriol & Alice Mesnard, 2016. "Sale of Visas: a Smuggler's Final Song?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 83(332), pages 646-678, October.
    18. Cris Beauchemin & Marine Haddad & Mamady Cisse & Christelle Nagnonhou & Lucas Ondicolberry & Andreas Priambodo, 2024. "Politique d’immigration, statut légal et fécondité des migrantes : le cas de Mayotte," Working Papers 297, French Institute for Demographic Studies.
    19. Claire Naiditch & Radu Vranceanu, 2020. "A matching model of the market for migrant smuggling services," Working Papers hal-02463193, HAL.
    20. Samuel Bazzi & Gordon Hanson & Sarah John & Bryan Roberts & John Whitley, 2021. "Deterring Illegal Entry: Migrant Sanctions and Recidivism in Border Apprehensions," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joimai:v:22:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12134-020-00774-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.