IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joerap/v7y2024i1d10.1007_s41996-023-00132-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Greater Diversity in Executive Race/Ethnicity Reliably Predict Better Future Firm Financial Performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Sekou Bermiss

    (UNC Chapel Hill)

  • Jeremiah Green

    (Texas A&M University)

  • John R. M. Hand

    (UNC Chapel Hill)

Abstract

In contrast to the equivocal findings in academic research, “the business case for diversity” is the dominant rhetorical paradigm for how US corporations debate actions and policies around racial/ethnic diversity. In this paper, we conduct an empirical test of the paradigm by gathering data on the race/ethnicity of the individuals shown on the leadership pages of S&P 500 firms’ websites as of mid-2011, 2014, 2017, 2020, and 2021, and then determining if any of nine measures of the racial/ethnic diversity of these executives reliably predict cross-sectional variation in any of six measures of their firms’ financial performance over the next fiscal year. We do not find reliable evidence that they do. As such, our results do not support the “business case for diversity” when the claim is assessed using 1-year-ahead financial performance metrics and multiple measures of the race/ethnicity of S&P 500 executives over the last decade.

Suggested Citation

  • Sekou Bermiss & Jeremiah Green & John R. M. Hand, 2024. "Does Greater Diversity in Executive Race/Ethnicity Reliably Predict Better Future Firm Financial Performance?," Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 45-60, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joerap:v:7:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s41996-023-00132-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s41996-023-00132-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41996-023-00132-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41996-023-00132-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joerap:v:7:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s41996-023-00132-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.