IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joamsc/v52y2024i3d10.1007_s11747-023-00964-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging B2B field service technicians as a “second sales force”: How service situations affect selling activity and success

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Berkmann

    (PHOENIX Group)

  • Maik Eisenbeiss

    (University of Bremen, markstones Institute of Marketing, Branding & Technology)

  • Werner Reinartz

    (University of Cologne, Department of Retailing and Customer Management)

  • Nico Schauerte

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Marketing)

Abstract

To extract the full revenue potential of their front line, B2B firms use their technical field service force for selling activities. However, as selling is only a complementary activity embedded in technicians’ main service tasks, they may struggle to sell effectively. The authors investigate the service situation as a key driver of (i) the technician’s decision to engage in selling (selling activity) and (ii) the customer’s decision to purchase (selling success). They identify four types of service situations with unique effects on these outcomes. Notably, technicians’ selling activity is highest (+ 10% compared to baseline) in service situations that offer a lower (-22%) likelihood of success, whereas activity is lower in the most promising situations. Thus, technicians do not properly exploit sales opportunities. The extent of inefficiencies moreover varies by employee-specific moderators, such that specialized technicians and those with little practical experience have particular difficulty exploiting excellent sales opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Berkmann & Maik Eisenbeiss & Werner Reinartz & Nico Schauerte, 2024. "Leveraging B2B field service technicians as a “second sales force”: How service situations affect selling activity and success," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 736-761, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:52:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11747-023-00964-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11747-023-00964-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11747-023-00964-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11747-023-00964-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James J. Heckman, 1976. "The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models," NBER Chapters, in: Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Volume 5, number 4, pages 475-492, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Sung‐Choon Kang & Scott A. Snell, 2009. "Intellectual Capital Architectures and Ambidextrous Learning: A Framework for Human Resource Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 65-92, January.
    3. M. Antioco & R.K. Moenaert & A. Lindgreen & M.G.M. Wetzels, 2008. "Organizational antecedents to and consequences of service business orientations in manufacturing companies," Post-Print hal-00285794, HAL.
    4. A. Colin Cameron & Douglas L. Miller, 2015. "A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 50(2), pages 317-372.
    5. Michael Antioco & Rudy Moenaert & Adam Lindgreen & Martin Wetzels, 2008. "Organizational antecedents to and consequences of service business orientations in manufacturing companies," Post-Print hal-02312526, HAL.
    6. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    7. Patterson, Paul & Yu, Ting & Kimpakorn, Narumon, 2014. "Killing two birds with one stone: Cross-selling during service delivery," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1944-1952.
    8. Augustin Landier & David Sraer & David Thesmar, 2009. "Optimal Dissent in Organizations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 76(2), pages 761-794.
    9. Daniel Ferreira & Raaj K. Sah, 2012. "Who gets to the top? Generalists versus specialists in managerial organizations," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 43(4), pages 577-601, December.
    10. Thomas E. DeCarlo & Son K. Lam, 2016. "Identifying effective hunters and farmers in the salesforce: a dispositional–situational framework," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 415-439, July.
    11. Wolfgang Ulaga & Werner Reinartz, 2011. "Hybrid Offerings: How Manufacturing Firms Combine Goods and Services Successfully," Post-Print hal-00642039, HAL.
    12. Wilde, Joachim, 2000. "Identification of multiple equation probit models with endogenous dummy regressors," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 309-312, December.
    13. Stefan Worm & Sundar G. Bharadwaj & Wolfgang Ulaga & Werner J. Reinartz, 2017. "When and why do customer solutions pay off in business markets?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 490-512, July.
    14. Lilien, Gary L., 2016. "The B2B Knowledge Gap," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 543-556.
    15. David Thesmar, 2009. "Optimal dissent and risk Management within organizations," Post-Print hal-00495931, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Homburg & Moritz Tischer, 2023. "Customer journey management capability in business-to-business markets: Its bright and dark sides and overall impact on firm performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 1046-1074, September.
    2. Stefan Worm & Sundar G. Bharadwaj & Wolfgang Ulaga & Werner J. Reinartz, 2017. "When and why do customer solutions pay off in business markets?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 490-512, July.
    3. Wei, Zelong & Huang, Wengao & Wang, Yanping & Sun, Lulu, 2022. "When does servitization promote product innovation? The moderating roles of product modularization and organization formalization," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    4. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    5. Ashkan Faramarzi & Stefan Worm & Wolfgang Ulaga, 2024. "Service strategy’s effect on firm performance: A meta-analysis of the servitization literature," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1018-1044, July.
    6. Rabetino, Rodrigo & Kohtamäki, Marko & Gebauer, Heiko, 2017. "Strategy map of servitization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 144-156.
    7. Hirschauer, Norbert & Grüner, Sven & Mußhoff, Oliver & Becker, Claudia & Jantsch, Antje, 2020. "Can p-values be meaningfully interpreted without random sampling?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14, pages 71-91.
    8. Ornella Benedettini, 2022. "Structuring Servitization-Related Capabilities: A Data-Driven Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Johansson, A. Elisabeth & Raddats, Chris & Witell, Lars, 2019. "The role of customer knowledge development for incremental and radical service innovation in servitized manufacturers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 328-338.
    10. Anh Dang & Trung Nguyen, 2021. "Valuation Effect of Emotionality in Corporate Philanthropy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 47-67, September.
    11. Blichfeldt, Henrik & Faullant, Rita, 2021. "Performance effects of digital technology adoption and product & service innovation – A process-industry perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    12. repec:osf:socarx:yazr8_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Kohtamäki, Marko & Einola, Suvi & Rabetino, Rodrigo, 2020. "Exploring servitization through the paradox lens: Coping practices in servitization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    14. Wang, Yanping & Gao, Jie & Wei, Zelong, 2022. "The double-edged sword of servitization in radical product innovation: The role of latent needs identification," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    15. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Lafuente, Esteban & Rabetino, Rodrigo & Vaillant, Yancy & Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran, 2019. "Make-or-buy configurational approaches in product-service ecosystems and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 393-401.
    16. Prior, Daniel D. & Keränen, Joona, 2020. "Revisiting contemporary issues in B2B marketing: It's not just about artificial intelligence," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 83-89.
    17. Wim Coreynen & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Johanna Vanderstraeten, 2021. "Toward Servitized Research: An Integrated Approach for Sustainable Product-Service Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Michael Steiner & Andreas Eggert & Wolfgang Ulaga & Klaus Backhaus, 2016. "Do customized service packages impede value capture in industrial markets?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 151-165, March.
    19. Shah, Syed Aamir Ali & Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel Sadiq & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Farooq, Sami, 2020. "Servitization and supply chain integration: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    20. Hadwich, Karsten & Vogel, Henrik, 2014. "Systemlösungsorientierung als Strategieoption der Servicetransformation: Umsetzung und Erfolgswirkungen im Vertrieb," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 68(4), pages 282-299.
    21. Yan, Kaining & Li, Gang & Cheng, T.C.E., 2020. "The impact of service-oriented organizational design factors on firm performance: The moderating role of service-oriented corporate culture," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:52:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11747-023-00964-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.