IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v16y2025i1d10.1007_s13132-024-01828-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Liaison Between Psychological Capital and Knowledge-Sharing Behavior Among ICAR Scientists

Author

Listed:
  • Vijaya Vardhan Manchala

    (Presidency University)

  • Dhruv Shankar Dutta

    (Pondicherry University)

  • Fakruddin Ali Ahmed

    (Presidency University)

  • Lourden Selvamani

    (Jain Deemed to be University)

Abstract

The main purpose of this empirical study is to find the evidence to establish the relationship between two intrinsic variables psychological capital and knowledge-sharing behavior. However, knowledge-sharing behavior is an individual’s dependent and intrinsic nature. Psychological capital is the positive psychological effects of the individual’s commitment and performance in the organization. This study aims to find the psychological effect of scientists on their knowledge-sharing behavior. The study includes a survey technique through a structured questionnaire and data was collected from scientists of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) in India through a structured questionnaire. The collected data was analyzed by using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) using LISREL10.1. The result shows that the model fit indices were within the acceptable limits showing a positive and significant relationship between psychological capital (hope, efficacy, resilience, and optimism) and knowledge-sharing behavior. The findings of the study confirm psychological capital measured in terms of hope, efficacy, resilience, and optimism positively affect the knowledge-sharing behavior. This research work has also its own limitations that can be addressed in future research. To measure knowledge sharing behavior we considered only the self-rated method and ignored the supervisory rated method. Other points are further discussed in the paper. The implications of the study discussed the need for designing an appropriate support system to enhance psychological capital in ICAR. This study provides insights to policymakers and researchers to uncover the importance of human capital. The limitations and future research direction are further discussed in the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Vijaya Vardhan Manchala & Dhruv Shankar Dutta & Fakruddin Ali Ahmed & Lourden Selvamani, 2025. "The Liaison Between Psychological Capital and Knowledge-Sharing Behavior Among ICAR Scientists," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 4019-4036, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s13132-024-01828-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-01828-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-024-01828-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-024-01828-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiwary, Nishant Kumar & Kumar, Rishi Kant & Sarraf, Shagun & Kumar, Prashant & Rana, Nripendra P., 2021. "Impact assessment of social media usage in B2B marketing: A review of the literature and a way forward," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 121-139.
    2. Rosenberg, Nathan & Nelson, Richard R., 1994. "American universities and technical advance in industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 323-348, May.
    3. Jeffrey Cummings, 2003. "Knowledge Sharing : A Review of the Literature," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 19060, April.
    4. David Ahlstrom & Jean‐Luc Arregle & Michael A. Hitt & Gongming Qian & Xufei Ma & Dries Faems, 2020. "Managing Technological, Sociopolitical, and Institutional Change in the New Normal," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 411-437, May.
    5. Douthwaite, B. & Keatinge, J. D. H. & Park, J. R., 2001. "Why promising technologies fail: the neglected role of user innovation during adoption," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 819-836, May.
    6. Lu, Lin & Leung, Kwok & Koch, Pamela Tremain, 2006. "Managerial Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Individual, Interpersonal, and Organizational Factors," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 15-41, March.
    7. Lin Lu & Kwok Leung & Pamela Tremain Koch, 2006. "Managerial Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Individual, Interpersonal, and Organizational Factors," Management and Organization Review, International Association of Chinese Management Research, vol. 2(1), pages 15-41, March.
    8. Kapri, Kul & Ghimire, Shankar, 2020. "Migration, remittance, and agricultural productivity: Evidence from the Nepal Living Standard Survey," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaolei Zou & Xiaoxi Chen & Fengling Chen & Chuxin Luo & Hongyan Liu, 2020. "The Influence of Negative Workplace Gossip on Knowledge Sharing: Insight from the Cognitive Dissonance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Sajjad Jasimuddin & Jun Li & Nicholas Perdikis, 2015. "Linkage between geographic space and knowledge transfer by multinational enterprises: a structural equation approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 769-795, May.
    3. Seba, Ibrahim & Rowley, Jennifer & Lambert, Sian, 2012. "Factors affecting attitudes and intentions towards knowledge sharing in the Dubai Police Force," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 372-380.
    4. Hao Lin & Chundong Wang & Yongjie Sun, 2024. "How big five personality traits influence information sharing on social media: A meta analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Xiaowan Lin, 2015. "How does procedural justice climate influence individual outcomes? An affective perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 771-800, September.
    6. Bindu Gupta & Sahil Joshi & Mohit Agarwal, 2012. "The Effect of Expected Benefit and Perceived Cost on Employees’ Knowledge Sharing Behavior: A Study of IT Employees in India," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 3(1).
    7. Sheehan, Maura & Garavan, Thomas N. & Morley, Michael J., 2020. "Transformational leadership and work unit innovation: A dyadic two-wave investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 399-412.
    8. Jon C. Carr & Michael S. Cole & J. Kirk Ring & Daniela P. Blettner, 2011. "A Measure of Variations in Internal Social Capital among Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(6), pages 1207-1227, November.
    9. Salah Shehab & Mohammad Al-Bsheish & Ahmed Meri & Mohammed Dauwed & Badr K Aldhmadi & Haitham Mohsin Kareem & Adi Alsyouf & Khalid Al-Mugheed & Mu’taman Jarrar, 2023. "Knowledge sharing behaviour among head nurses in online health communities: The moderating role of knowledge self-efficacy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Wang, Mingsheng & Yang, Yongzhong & Zhong, Peichi, 2025. "How does AI affect the self-actualization of content creators in dynamic environments? A knowledge management perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Wonseok Choi & Wongun Goo & Yongjun Choi, 2022. "Perceived Organizational Support and Knowledge Sharing: A Moderated-Mediation Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    12. Billy Whisnant & Odai Khasawneh, 2014. "How vertical exchanges in it organizations encourage the sharing of knowledge and the mediating influence of trust and reciprocity," Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, ScientificPapers.org, vol. 4(1.1), pages 1-8, February.
    13. Rayhab Anwar & Mobashar Rehman & Hafiz Mudassir Rehman & Shazia Nauman & Ayesha Sarwar Khan & Mustafa Malik, 2024. "Breaking Down Barriers: The Moderating Role of Organizational Support in Facilitating Knowledge Sharing Among Software Developers," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    14. Ying Zhang & Puzhen Xiong & Wei Zhou & Lang Sun & Edwin T.C. Cheng, 2023. "Exploring the longitudinal effects of emotional intelligence and cultural intelligence on knowledge management processes," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 1555-1578, December.
    15. Xingshan Zheng & Lan Li & Fangyu Zhang & Mengyuan Zhu, 2019. "The Roles of Power Distance Orientation and Perceived Insider Status in the Subordinates’ Moqi with Supervisors and Sustainable Knowledge-Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Hong Tian & Ao Wang, 2023. "Sustainable Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, and Frugal Innovation: The Moderating Role of Organizational Innovation Climate," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    17. Syed Talib Hussain & Jaffar Abbas & Shen Lei & Muhammad Jamal Haider & Tayyaba Akram, 2017. "Transactional leadership and organizational creativity: Examining the mediating role of knowledge sharing behavior," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1361663-136, January.
    18. Li, Shenyu & Popkowsky Leszczyc, Peter T.L. & Qiu, Chun, 2023. "International retailer performance: Disentangling the interplay between rule of law and culture," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 193-209.
    19. Ozgur Aydogmus & Erkan Gürpinar, 2022. "Science, Technology and Institutional Change in Knowledge Production: An Evolutionary Game Theoretic Framework," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 1163-1188, December.
    20. Junfu Zhang, 2006. "A Study of Academic Entrepreneurs Using Venture Capital Data," PPIC Working Papers 2006.01, Public Policy Institute of California.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s13132-024-01828-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.