IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v12y2021i1d10.1007_s13132-018-0559-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Squeezing the Middle: the Consequences of Quality Oversight in Management Education

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrich Hommel

    (EBS Universität für Wirtschaft & Recht)

  • Ben Woods

    (EBS Universität für Wirtschaft & Recht)

Abstract

This study examines the linkage between quality and institutional dynamics with a focus on the business school sector. For this purpose, we consider the triad of quality management—quality assurance, reputation management, and risk management—and apply Fligstein and McAdam’s (A theory of fields, 2012) theory of fields to analyze its impact on the institutional dynamics of the sector. We observe that a large tranche of incumbent business schools is dependent upon field stability for its resources, but that stability is being unsettled by internal and external forces. We argue that, unlike the ranked (elite) schools, middle-of-the-pack incumbents lack the existential and material slack to abandon the status quo in times of change, and, unlike unranked (challenger) schools, they lack the irreverence to eschew quality management practices altogether. Our logic explains why “institutional entrepreneurs,” here defined as agents of innovative collective action, can mainly be found at the top end and the fringe of the business school sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrich Hommel & Ben Woods, 2021. "Squeezing the Middle: the Consequences of Quality Oversight in Management Education," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(1), pages 96-114, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s13132-018-0559-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-018-0559-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-018-0559-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-018-0559-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gareth Williams & Igor Kitaev, 2005. "Overview of National Policy Contexts for Entrepreneurialism in Higher Education Institutions," Higher Education Management and Policy, OECD Publishing, vol. 17(3), pages 125-141.
    2. Etzkowitz, Henry & Webster, Andrew & Gebhardt, Christiane & Terra, Branca Regina Cantisano, 2000. "The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 313-330, February.
    3. Herbert A. Simon, 1967. "The BUSINESS SCHOOL A PROBLEM IN ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Ken Starkey & Armand Hatchuel & Sue Tempest, 2004. "Rethinking the Business School," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(8), pages 1521-1531, December.
    5. Gibbons, Stephen & Neumayer, Eric & Perkins, Richard, 2013. "Student satisfaction, league tables and University applications," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 58540, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Rakesh Khurana, 2007. "Introduction to From Higher Aims to Hired Hands The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession," Introductory Chapters, in: From Higher Aims to Hired Hands The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession, Princeton University Press.
    7. C. Edward Fee & Charles J. Hadlock & Joshua R. Pierce, 2005. "Business School Rankings and Business School Deans: A Study of Nonprofit Governance," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 34(1), Spring.
    8. Bruce H. Clark & David B. Montgomery, 1998. "Deterrence, Reputations, and Competitive Cognition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 62-82, January.
    9. Stijn Broecke, 2015. "Experience and the returns to education and skill in OECD countries: Evidence of employer learning?," OECD Journal: Economic Studies, OECD Publishing, vol. 2015(1), pages 123-147.
    10. Michael Shattock, 2005. "European Universities for Entrepreneurship: Their Role in the Europe of Knowledge," Higher Education Management and Policy, OECD Publishing, vol. 17(3), pages 13-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. -C. Spender, 2017. "BSchools and Their Business Models," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 187-204, April.
    2. Bullinger, Bernadette & Kieser, Alfred & Schiller-Merkens, Simone, 2015. "Coping with institutional complexity: Responses of management scholars to competing logics in the field of management studies," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 437-450.
    3. Huang, Mu-Hsuan & Chen, Dar-Zen, 2017. "How can academic innovation performance in university–industry collaboration be improved?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 210-215.
    4. Steven Taylor & Donna Ladkin & Matt Statler, 2015. "Caring Orientations: The Normative Foundations of the Craft of Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 575-584, May.
    5. Mirjana Cvijić & Jovana Tatarski & Ivana Katić & Aleksandar Vekić & Jelena Borocki, 2019. "Entrepreneurial Orientation of Public Universities in Republic of Serbia-Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Tina C. Ambos & Kristiina Mäkelä & Julian Birkinshaw & Pablo D'Este, 2008. "When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 1424-1447, December.
    7. Maria Jose Murcia & Hector O. Rocha & Julian Birkinshaw, 2018. "Business Schools at the Crossroads? A Trip Back from Sparta to Athens," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 579-591, June.
    8. Eero Vaara & Eric Faÿ, 2011. "How can a bourdieusian perspective aid analysis of MBA education ?," Post-Print hal-02276712, HAL.
    9. Deakin, S. & Koukiadaki, A., 2011. "Capability Theory, Employee Voice and Corporate Restructuring: Evidence from UK Case Studies," Working Papers wp429, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    10. Claus Dierksmeier, 2011. "The Freedom–Responsibility Nexus in Management Philosophy and Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 263-283, June.
    11. Esteban Lafuente & Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, 2019. "Assessing the productivity of technology transfer offices: an analysis of the relevance of aspiration performance and portfolio complexity," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 778-801, June.
    12. Lander, Bryn & Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet, 2011. "Translational science and the hidden research system in universities and academic hospitals: A case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(4), pages 537-544, February.
    13. Camelia Ilie & Gaston Fornes & Guillermo Cardoza & Juan Carlos Mondragón Quintana, 2020. "Development of Business Schools in Emerging Markets: Learning through Adoption and Adaptation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-28, October.
    14. Cornelia Lawson, 2016. "Putting the Region First: Knowledge Transfer at Universities in Greater Manchester," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: David Audretsch & Erik Lehmann & Michele Meoli & Silvio Vismara (ed.), University Evolution, Entrepreneurial Activity and Regional Competitiveness, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 303-325, Springer.
    15. Sofie Cabus & Joanna Napierala & Stephanie Carretero, 2021. "The Returns to Non-Cognitive Skills: A Meta-Analysis," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2021-06, Joint Research Centre.
    16. Mira Fischer & Patrick Kampkötter, 2017. "Effects of German Universities' Excellence Initiative on Ability Sorting of Students and Perceptions of Educational Quality," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 173(4), pages 662-687, December.
    17. David Grosse Kathoefer & Jens Leker, 2012. "Knowledge transfer in academia: an exploratory study on the Not-Invented-Here Syndrome," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 658-675, October.
    18. Serrano García, Jakeline & Acevedo Álvarez, Carlos Alberto & Castelblanco Gómez, Johnatan Mauricio & Arbeláez Toro, Juan José, 2017. "Measuring organizational capabilities for technological innovation through a fuzzy inference system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 93-109.
    19. Paola Giuri & Federico Munari & Martina Pasquini, 2013. "What Determines University Patent Commercialization? Empirical Evidence on the Role of IPR Ownership," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 488-502, July.
    20. Olavarrieta, Sergio & Quinteros, María José & Villena, Mauricio, 2021. "A Strategic Impact Model for Latin American Business Schools," MPRA Paper 107813, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 17 Apr 2021.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s13132-018-0559-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.