IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v5y2003i4d10.1023_bisfi.0000005652.72048.4d.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Set-Theoretical Foundation of Qualitative Reasoning and its Application to the Modeling of Economics and Business Management Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Aimo Hinkkanen

    (University of Illinois)

  • Karl R. Lang

    (Baruch College City University of New York (CUNY))

  • Andrew B. Whinston

    (The University of Texas at Austin)

Abstract

The qualitative reasoning (QR) field has developed various representation and reasoning methods for the modeling with incomplete information or incomplete knowledge. While most uncertain reasoning approaches describe uncertain or imprecisely known information as probability distribution functions, qualitative reasoning bases its model specification on qualitative descriptions that are derived from known qualitative system properties. Problems are formulated as sets of qualitative constraints and their analysis is performed by applying a qualitative calculus. This paper presents a general, unifying theory of the various existing qualitative reasoning systems that includes, as special cases, reasoning methods that use representations of qualitative differential equations and qualitative difference equations. Based on set theory, our QR framework describes fundamental concepts such as qualitative models and solutions, and relates them to the quantitative analogues of its underlying quantitative reference system. Our motivation arises from the types of models found in the management sciences. Thus we emphasize the significance of discrete, dynamic models and optimization models in the business management and economics fields, both of which have received less attention in current QR research. Finally, we extend our theoretical framework to include an approach to qualitative optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Aimo Hinkkanen & Karl R. Lang & Andrew B. Whinston, 2003. "A Set-Theoretical Foundation of Qualitative Reasoning and its Application to the Modeling of Economics and Business Management Problems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 379-399, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:5:y:2003:i:4:d:10.1023_b:isfi.0000005652.72048.4d
    DOI: 10.1023/B:ISFI.0000005652.72048.4d
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/B:ISFI.0000005652.72048.4d
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/B:ISFI.0000005652.72048.4d?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farley, Arthur M. & Lin, Kuan-Pin, 1990. "Qualitative reasoning in economics," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 465-490, May.
    2. Lang, Karl R & Moore, James C & Whinston, Andrew B, 1995. "Computational Systems for Qualitative Economics," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26.
    3. Peter R. Monge, 1990. "Theoretical and Analytical Issues in Studying Organizational Processes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(4), pages 406-430, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Takemura, Ryo, 2020. "Economic reasoning with demand and supply graphs," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 25-35.
    2. François Galasso & Yves Ducq & Matthieu Lauras & Didier Gourc & Mamadou Camara, 2016. "A method to select a successful interoperability solution through a simulation approach," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 217-229, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iversen, Jakob & Ngwenyama, Ojelanki, 2006. "Problems in measuring effectiveness in software process improvement: A longitudinal study of organizational change at Danske Data," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 30-43.
    2. Omar N. Solinger & Woody van Olffen & Robert A. Roe & Joeri Hofmans, 2013. "On Becoming (Un)Committed: A Taxonomy and Test of Newcomer Onboarding Scenarios," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 1640-1661, December.
    3. Bastian Grühn & Steffen Strese & Tessa C. Flatten & Nikolai A. Jaeger & Malte Brettel, 2017. "Temporal Change Patterns of Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Longitudinal Investigation of CEO Successions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(4), pages 591-619, July.
    4. Lichtenstein, Benyamin B. & Dooley, Kevin J. & Lumpkin, G.T., 2006. "Measuring emergence in the dynamics of new venture creation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 153-175, March.
    5. Takemura, Ryo, 2020. "Economic reasoning with demand and supply graphs," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 25-35.
    6. Aleksander Janes, 2011. "Managing Sustainability with a Little Help from Statistical Methods?," MIC 2011: Managing Sustainability? Proceedings of the 12th International Conference, Portorož, 23–26 November 2011 [Selected Papers],, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper.
    7. Berndsen, Ron & Daniels, Hennie, 1990. "Qualitative dynamics and causality in a Keynesian model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 435-450, May.
    8. Mulder, Joris & Leenders, Roger Th.A.J., 2019. "Modeling the evolution of interaction behavior in social networks: A dynamic relational event approach for real-time analysis," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 73-85.
    9. Eisenack, K. & Welsch, H. & Kropp, J.P., 2006. "A qualitative dynamical modelling approach to capital accumulation in unregulated fisheries," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 30(12), pages 2613-2636, December.
    10. Erhart, Raphaela & Mahlendorf, Matthias D. & Reimer, Marko & Schäffer, Utz, 2017. "Theorizing and testing bidirectional effects: The relationship between strategy formation and involvement of controllers," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 36-52.
    11. Gina Colarelli O'Connor & Mark P. Rice & Lois Peters & Robert W. Veryzer, 2003. "Managing Interdisciplinary, Longitudinal Research Teams: Extending Grounded Theory-Building Methodologies," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 353-373, August.
    12. Metsola, Jaakko & Leppäaho, Tanja & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, Eriikka & Plakoyiannaki, Emmanuella, 2020. "Process in family business internationalisation: The state of the art and ways forward," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(2).
    13. Rogelio Oliva, 2020. "On structural dominance analysis," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 8-28, January.
    14. Liu, Xiaohui & Gao, Lan & Lu, Jiangyong & Wei, Yingqi, 2015. "The role of highly skilled migrants in the process of inter-firm knowledge transfer across borders," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 56-68.
    15. Giorgio Brajnik & Marji Lines, 1998. "Qualitative Modeling and Simulation of Socio-Economic Phenomena," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 1(1), pages 1-2.
    16. James B. Thomas & Stephanie Watts Sussman & John C. Henderson, 2001. "Understanding “Strategic Learning”: Linking Organizational Learning, Knowledge Management, and Sensemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 331-345, June.
    17. Jae C. Jung & Paul W. Beamish & Anthony Goerzen, 2010. "Dynamics of Experience, Environment and MNE Ownership Strategy," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 267-296, June.
    18. Berndsen, R.J., 1992. "Qualitative reasoning and knowledge representation in economic models," Other publications TiSEM 81fd6886-b744-4c37-9dac-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Saxena, Richa, 2006. "Methods for the Study of Downsizing: A Review," IIMA Working Papers WP2006-12-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:5:y:2003:i:4:d:10.1023_b:isfi.0000005652.72048.4d. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.