IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v27y2016i1d10.1007_s10845-014-0889-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A method to select a successful interoperability solution through a simulation approach

Author

Listed:
  • François Galasso

    (University of Toulouse)

  • Yves Ducq

    (Univ. Bordeaux)

  • Matthieu Lauras

    (University of Toulouse
    University of Toulouse)

  • Didier Gourc

    (University of Toulouse)

  • Mamadou Camara

    (Univ. Bordeaux)

Abstract

Enterprise applications and software systems need to be interoperable in order to achieve seamless business across organizational boundaries and thus realize virtual networked organizations. Our proposition can be considered as an interoperability project selection approach and is based on three steps: (1) Modelling both collaborative business processes and potential related interoperability projects; (2) Evaluating the accessibility of each project regarding the current state of the organization; (3) Simulating each project and assessing the associated performance. These results are finally projected on a comparison matrix used as a decision support to select the most appropriate interoperability solution. An application case extracted from the French aerospace sector demonstrates the applicability and the benefits of the proposition.

Suggested Citation

  • François Galasso & Yves Ducq & Matthieu Lauras & Didier Gourc & Mamadou Camara, 2016. "A method to select a successful interoperability solution through a simulation approach," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 217-229, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:27:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10845-014-0889-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-014-0889-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-014-0889-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-014-0889-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghalayini, Alaa M. & Noble, James S. & Crowe, Thomas J., 1997. "An integrated dynamic performance measurement system for improving manufacturing competitiveness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 207-225, February.
    2. Aimo Hinkkanen & Karl R. Lang & Andrew B. Whinston, 2003. "A Set-Theoretical Foundation of Qualitative Reasoning and its Application to the Modeling of Economics and Business Management Problems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 379-399, December.
    3. Thomas A. Hansen & Jens O. Riis, 1999. "Exploratory performance assessment," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2), pages 113-133.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Izunildo Cabral & Antonio Grilo, 2018. "Impact of Business Interoperability on the Performance of Complex Cooperative Supply Chain Networks: A Case Study," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-30, February.
    2. L. Berrah & V. Clivillé & J. Montmain & G. Mauris, 2019. "The Contribution concept for the control of a manufacturing multi-criteria performance improvement," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 47-58, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriela Chmelíková, 2011. "Framework of performance measurement system for Czech small breweries," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(7), pages 167-176.
    2. Vladimir Shatrevich & Valentina Strautmane, 2015. "Industrialisation factors in post-industrial society," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 3(2), pages 157-172, December.
    3. Amanda Curry, 2019. "Across the great divide: a literature review of management accounting and operations management at the shop floor," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 75-119, February.
    4. Quezada, Luis E. & Cordova, Felisa M. & Palominos, Pedro & Godoy, Katherine & Ross, Jocelyn, 2009. "Method for identifying strategic objectives in strategy maps," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 492-500, November.
    5. Takemura, Ryo, 2020. "Economic reasoning with demand and supply graphs," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 25-35.
    6. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco & Tarba, Shlomo, 2022. "Exploring the interplay between Smart Manufacturing and KIBS firms in configuring product-service innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. Aurora A. C. Teixeira & Pedro Cosme Vieira & Ana Patrícia Abreu, 2017. "Sleeping Beauties and their princes in innovation studies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 541-580, February.
    8. Marikka Heikkilä & Harry Bouwman & Jukka Heikkilä & Sam Solaimani & Wil Janssen, 2016. "Business model metrics: an open repository," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 337-366, May.
    9. Berrah, L. & Mauris, G. & Montmain, J., 2008. "Monitoring the improvement of an overall industrial performance based on a Choquet integral aggregation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 340-351, June.
    10. Wang, Chun-Hsien & Lu, Iuan-Yuan & Chen, Chin-Bein, 2010. "Integrating hierarchical balanced scorecard with non-additive fuzzy integral for evaluating high technology firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 413-426, November.
    11. Khalid Al-Shuaibi, 2016. "Reaping the Benefits of Long Term Relationship with Suppliers: An Evidence from the Saudi Chemical Industry," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 203-203, July.
    12. Hudson Smith, Mel & Smith, Dave, 2007. "Implementing strategically aligned performance measurement in small firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 393-408, April.
    13. M. Ishaq Bhatti & H. Awan & Z. Razaq, 2014. "The key performance indicators (KPIs) and their impact on overall organizational performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3127-3143, November.
    14. Zarinah Abdul Rasit & Che Ruhana Isa Mohamed Isa & Nadiah Abdul Hamid & Siti Nurhazwani Kamarudin, 2023. "Cognitive Motivational Perspectives of Performance Measurement System and Organisational Commitment: Role Ambiguity as a Mediator," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(2), pages 1-64, May.
    15. Aquilino Felizardo & Elisabete G.S. Félix & João P.C. F. Thomaz, 2017. "Organizational Performance Measurement and Evaluation Systems in Smes: The Case of the Transforming Industry in Portugal," CEFAGE-UE Working Papers 2017_05, University of Evora, CEFAGE-UE (Portugal).
    16. Helder Jose Celani de Souza & Valerio Antonio Pamplona Salomon & Carlos Eduardo Sanches da Silva, 2023. "Statistical Predictors of Project Management Maturity," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Srikanta Acharya, 2019. "Beyond Learning Outcomes: Impact of Organizational Flexibility on Strategic Performance Measures of Commercial E-Learning Providers," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(1), pages 31-41, March.
    18. Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Angelis, Jannis Jan & Munik, Juliano, 2013. "Performance measurement systems: A consensual analysis of their roles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 524-542.
    19. L. Berrah & V. Clivillé & J. Montmain & G. Mauris, 2019. "The Contribution concept for the control of a manufacturing multi-criteria performance improvement," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 47-58, January.
    20. Lavinia Mustea & Lavinia Daniela Mihit & Oana-Ramona Lobont, 2021. "How Should we Measure Public Sector Performance?TITLU," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(1Sup1), pages 71-89, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:27:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10845-014-0889-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.