IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v48y2014i6p3127-3143.html

The key performance indicators (KPIs) and their impact on overall organizational performance

Author

Listed:
  • M. Ishaq Bhatti

  • H. Awan

  • Z. Razaq

Abstract

The concept of performance management is used by most of the organizations to ensure that either they are going on the right path or not. For managing the performance the organizations are required to know about the performance indicators. This paper explores the key performance indicators (KPIs) and impact of these KPIs on the overall organizational performance in manufacturing sector in Pakistan. The data for present study collected from the top level management of the 84 best manufacturing organizations in Pakistan by using a structured questionnaire and the impact of KPIs on the overall performance of the manufacturing organizations were evaluated. The results show that the manufacturing organizations put more focus on the customer satisfaction and Delivery reliability in terms of performance measurement. And measuring the performance in terms of cost, financial, quality, time, flexibility, delivery reliability, safety, customer satisfaction, employees’ satisfaction and social performance indicators have positive significant impact on the overall organization’s performance. This paper puts together all important performance indicators used by organizations in a single list and check their impact on the overall performance indicator index of the Organizations. As Pakistan is among the developing countries, this study will serve as a valuable guideline for several manufacturing organizations operating in other developing countries of the world. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Suggested Citation

  • M. Ishaq Bhatti & H. Awan & Z. Razaq, 2014. "The key performance indicators (KPIs) and their impact on overall organizational performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3127-3143, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:48:y:2014:i:6:p:3127-3143
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-013-9945-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-013-9945-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-013-9945-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ittner, CD & Larcker, DF, 1998. "Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36, pages 1-35.
    2. Utterback, James M & Abernathy, William J, 1975. "A dynamic model of process and product innovation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 3(6), pages 639-656, December.
    3. Ghalayini, Alaa M. & Noble, James S. & Crowe, Thomas J., 1997. "An integrated dynamic performance measurement system for improving manufacturing competitiveness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 207-225, February.
    4. Leong, G. K. & Snyder, D. L. & Ward, P. T., 1990. "Research in the process and content of manufacturing strategy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 109-122.
    5. Ernest H. Forman & Saul I. Gass, 2001. "The Analytic Hierarchy Process---An Exposition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 469-486, August.
    6. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    7. Diana Heckl & Jürgen Moormann, 2010. "Process Performance Management," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 2, pages 115-135, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Snežana Nestić & Ranka Gojković & Tijana Petrović & Danijela Tadić & Predrag Mimović, 2022. "Quality Performance Indicators Evaluation and Ranking by Using TOPSIS with the Interval-Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets in Project-Oriented Manufacturing Companies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Marelby Amado Mateus & Alfredo Guzmán Rincón & Merlin Patricia Grueso Hinestroza, 2024. "Predictive Variables of Organisational Performance in Creative Industry Companies from the Perspective of Managers: Experiences in SMEs," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 33(3), pages 485-516, August.
    3. Zdenka Gyurák Babeľová & Augustín Stareček, 2021. "Evaluation of industrial enterprises' performance by different generations of employees," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(2), pages 346-362, December.
    4. Zhang, Haili & Song, Michael & Wang, Yufan, 2023. "Does AI-infused operations capability enhance or impede the relationship between information technology capability and firm performance?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Kevin Escoz Barragan & Felix Simon Rudolf Becker, 2025. "Keeping pace with the digital transformation — exploring the digital orientation of SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 1361-1385, March.
    6. Ciprian Cristea & Maria Cristea, 2021. "KPIs for Operational Performance Assessment in Flexible Packaging Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Nora CHIRIȚĂ & Andrei VIȘAN & Mihaela POPESCU, 2020. "Measuring Adobe Company performance from the perspective of a Complex Adaptive System," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(4(625), W), pages 55-72, Winter.
    8. Lubna Q. OWAIS, 2021. "A Brief Overview Of Performance Management Systems," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 25, pages 23-30, May.
    9. Diogo Rodrigues & Radu Godina & Pedro Espadinha da Cruz, 2021. "Key Performance Indicators Selection through an Analytic Network Process Model for Tooling and Die Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Michael Huber & Nikola Komatina & Vladan Paunović & Snežana Nestić, 2023. "Analysis of the Relationship between the Organizational Resilience Factors and Key Performance Indicators’ Recovery Time in Uncertain Environments in Industrial Enterprises," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Ionuț NICA & Nora CHIRIȚĂ & Ștefan IONESCU, 2021. "Using of KPIs and Dashboard in the analysis of Nike company's performance management," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(1(626), S), pages 61-84, Spring.
    12. S. Plitsos & K. Giannakos & T. Farmakis & P. Eirinakis & T. Hohmann & O. Jotz & G. Vivo, 2026. "Enabling production re-configurability through Digital Twins: a case study approach," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 1591-1614, April.
    13. Claudia Toma & Rik Janssens & Valérie De Cock, 2023. "Diversity Decoupling in Top European Corporations: Myth or Fact?," Working Papers CEB 23-005, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    14. Mitrašević, Lidija & Tešić, Dejan & Radovanović, Lazar & Lalić, Srđan, 2024. "The role of accounting in measuring the effects of digital marketing in social enterprises," EconStor Conference Papers 339758, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    15. Md. Abdul Moktadir & Ashish Dwivedi & Akib Rahman & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Razia Sultana & Jitender Madaan, 2020. "An investigation of key performance indicators for operational excellence towards sustainability in the leather products industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3331-3351, December.
    16. Sharmin Sharmin & Ismail Ahmedy & Bryan Raj Peter Jabaraj & Muhammad Umair Munir & Rafidah Md Noor & Muneer Ahmad, 2026. "A comprehensive review of machine learning-driven self-organizing networks for 5G coverage and capacity," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 1-37, March.
    17. Henao, Rafael & Sarache, William, 2022. "Sustainable performance in manufacturing operations: The cumulative approach vs. trade-offs approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    18. Andrea Rey-Martí & J. Augusto Felício & Ricardo Rodrigues, 2017. "Entrepreneurial attributes for success in the small hotel sector: a fuzzy-set QCA approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 2085-2100, September.
    19. Carmen B. Rosa & Graciele Rediske & Paula D. Rigo & João Francisco M. Wendt & Leandro Michels & Julio Cezar M. Siluk, 2018. "Development of a Computational Tool for Measuring Organizational Competitiveness in the Photovoltaic Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Debaleena Chatterjee & Protik Basu, 2023. "Classification Analysis for Brand Loyalty Determination," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(1), pages 106-120, February.
    2. Wenshuai Wu & Gang Kou, 2016. "A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Andrew R. Kamwendo & Mandusha Maharaj, 2022. "The Preferences of Consumers When Selecting Clothing Detergent Products," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 12(6), pages 23-36, November.
    4. James G. Dolan & Emily Boohaker & Jeroan Allison & Thomas F. Imperiale, 2014. "Can Streamlined Multicriteria Decision Analysis Be Used to Implement Shared Decision Making for Colorectal Cancer Screening?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 34(6), pages 746-755, August.
    5. Marie-Sophie Denner & Louis Christian Püschel & Maximilian Röglinger, 2018. "How to Exploit the Digitalization Potential of Business Processes," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(4), pages 331-349, August.
    6. Vivek Sharma & Sandeep Grover & S. K. Sharma, 2020. "An integrated AHP-GTA approach for measuring effectiveness of quality tools and techniques," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(1), pages 54-63, February.
    7. Bana e Costa, Carlos A. & Vansnick, Jean-Claude, 2008. "A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1422-1428, June.
    8. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui, 2014. "Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 794-801.
    9. Devesh Kumar & Gunjan Soni & Rohit Joshi & Vipul Jain & Amrik Sohal, 2022. "Modelling supply chain viability during COVID-19 disruption: A case of an Indian automobile manufacturing supply chain," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1224-1240, December.
    10. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine, 2020. "XOR analytic hierarchy process and its application in the renewable energy sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Bentes, Alexandre Veronese & Carneiro, Jorge & da Silva, Jorge Ferreira & Kimura, Herbert, 2012. "Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(12), pages 1790-1799.
    12. A Ishizaka & D Balkenborg & T Kaplan, 2011. "Does AHP help us make a choice? An experimental evaluation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(10), pages 1801-1812, October.
    13. Anu Antony & Ansted Iype Joseph, 2017. "Influence of Behavioural Factors Affecting Investment Decision—An AHP Analysis," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 16(2), pages 107-114, December.
    14. Benedetto Barabino & Nicola Aldo Cabras & Claudio Conversano & Alessandro Olivo, 2020. "An Integrated Approach to Select Key Quality Indicators in Transit Services," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 1045-1080, June.
    15. P Ji & R Jiang, 2003. "Scale transitivity in the AHP," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(8), pages 896-905, August.
    16. Rabia Bovkir & Eda Ustaoglu & Arif Cagdas Aydinoglu, 2023. "Assessment of Urban Quality of Life Index at Local Scale with Different Weighting Approaches," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 655-678, January.
    17. Butler, John C. & Dyer, James S. & Jia, Jianmin & Tomak, Kerem, 2008. "Enabling e-transactions with multi-attribute preference models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 748-765, April.
    18. Wolfgang Ossadnik & Stefanie Schinke & Ralf H. Kaspar, 2016. "Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 421-457, March.
    19. Song-Kyoo Kim, 2014. "Explicit Design of Innovation Performance Metrics by Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Expansion," International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-7, May.
    20. Ouesleti, Bilel & Costa-Font, Montserrat & Kallas, Zein & Chema Gil, Jose Maria, 2015. "Determinant Factors Affecting The Point of Purchase Selection: valuation and Perceptions," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212603, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:48:y:2014:i:6:p:3127-3143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.