IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v15y2024i4d10.1007_s13198-022-01843-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Condition-based maintenance using machine learning and role of interpretability: a review

Author

Listed:
  • Jeetesh Sharma

    (Malaviya National Institute of Technology)

  • Murari Lal Mittal

    (Malaviya National Institute of Technology)

  • Gunjan Soni

    (Malaviya National Institute of Technology)

Abstract

This article aims to review the literature on condition-based maintenance (CBM) by analyzing various terms, applications, and challenges. CBM is a maintenance technique that monitors the existing condition of an industrial asset to determine what maintenance needs to be performed. This article enlightens the readers with research in condition-based maintenance using machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques and related literature. A bibliometric analysis is performed on the data collected from the Scopus database. The foundation of a CBM is accurate anomaly detection and diagnosis. Several machine-learning approaches have produced excellent results for anomaly detection and diagnosis. However, due to the black-box nature of the machine learning models, the level of their interpretability is limited. This article provides insight into the existing maintenance strategies, anomaly detection techniques, interpretable models, and model-agnostic methods that are being applied. It has been found that significant work has been done towards condition based-maintenance using machine learning, but explainable artificial intelligence approaches got less attention in CBM. Based on the review, we contend that explainable artificial intelligence can provide unique insights and opportunities for addressing critical difficulties in maintenance leading to more informed decision-making. The analysis put forward encouraging research directions in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeetesh Sharma & Murari Lal Mittal & Gunjan Soni, 2024. "Condition-based maintenance using machine learning and role of interpretability: a review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(4), pages 1345-1360, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13198-022-01843-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-022-01843-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-022-01843-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-022-01843-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minghui Ou & Hua Wei & Yiyi Zhang & Jiancheng Tan, 2019. "A Dynamic Adam Based Deep Neural Network for Fault Diagnosis of Oil-Immersed Power Transformers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Zhao, Yang & Liu, Peng & Wang, Zhenpo & Zhang, Lei & Hong, Jichao, 2017. "Fault and defect diagnosis of battery for electric vehicles based on big data analysis methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 354-362.
    3. Daniel W. Apley & Jingyu Zhu, 2020. "Visualizing the effects of predictor variables in black box supervised learning models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(4), pages 1059-1086, September.
    4. Swanson, Laura, 2001. "Linking maintenance strategies to performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 237-244, April.
    5. Alexandros Bousdekis & Babis Magoutas & Dimitris Apostolou & Gregoris Mentzas, 2018. "Review, analysis and synthesis of prognostic-based decision support methods for condition based maintenance," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1303-1316, August.
    6. Gits, C. W., 1992. "Design of maintenance concepts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 217-226, March.
    7. Hsu-Hao Yang & Mei-Ling Huang & Shih-Wei Yang, 2015. "Integrating Auto-Associative Neural Networks with Hotelling T 2 Control Charts for Wind Turbine Fault Detection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Guifang Liu & Huaiqian Bao & Baokun Han, 2018. "A Stacked Autoencoder-Based Deep Neural Network for Achieving Gearbox Fault Diagnosis," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-10, July.
    9. Salahshoor, Karim & Kordestani, Mojtaba & Khoshro, Majid S., 2010. "Fault detection and diagnosis of an industrial steam turbine using fusion of SVM (support vector machine) and ANFIS (adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system) classifiers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5472-5482.
    10. Wenna Zhang & Xiandong Ma, 2016. "Simultaneous Fault Detection and Sensor Selection for Condition Monitoring of Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Sunil Sapra, 2010. "Robust vs. classical principalcomponent analysis in the presence of outliers," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 519-523.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toon Vanderschueren & Robert Boute & Tim Verdonck & Bart Baesens & Wouter Verbeke, 2022. "Prescriptive maintenance with causal machine learning," Papers 2206.01562, arXiv.org.
    2. Muchiri, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Gelders, Ludo & Martin, Harry, 2011. "Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 295-302, May.
    3. Vanderschueren, Toon & Boute, Robert & Verdonck, Tim & Baesens, Bart & Verbeke, Wouter, 2023. "Optimizing the preventive maintenance frequency with causal machine learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    4. Mahboob Elahi & Samuel Olaiya Afolaranmi & Wael M. Mohammed & Jose Luis Martinez Lastra, 2022. "Energy-Based Prognostics for Gradual Loss of Conveyor Belt Tension in Discrete Manufacturing Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Jinrui Nan & Bo Deng & Wanke Cao & Jianjun Hu & Yuhua Chang & Yili Cai & Zhiwei Zhong, 2022. "Big Data-Based Early Fault Warning of Batteries Combining Short-Text Mining and Grey Correlation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Ruairi C. Robertson & Thaddeus J. Edens & Lynnea Carr & Kuda Mutasa & Ethan K. Gough & Ceri Evans & Hyun Min Geum & Iman Baharmand & Sandeep K. Gill & Robert Ntozini & Laura E. Smith & Bernard Chasekw, 2023. "The gut microbiome and early-life growth in a population with high prevalence of stunting," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Leandro Andrián & Oscar Mauricio Valencia, 2023. "Past the Tipping Point? Assessing Debt Overhang in Latin America and the Caribbean," IDB Publications (Book Chapters), in: Andrew Powell & Oscar Mauricio Valencia (ed.), Dealing with Debt, edition 1, chapter 8, pages 183-196, Inter-American Development Bank.
    8. Arranhado, Esmeralda & Barbosa, Lágida & Bastos, João A., 2025. "Multidimensional poverty in Benin," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Li, Shuangqi & He, Hongwen & Li, Jianwei, 2019. "Big data driven lithium-ion battery modeling method based on SDAE-ELM algorithm and data pre-processing technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1259-1273.
    10. Wang, Anqi & Pei, Yan & Qian, Zheng & Zareipour, Hamidreza & Jing, Bo & An, Jiayi, 2022. "A two-stage anomaly decomposition scheme based on multi-variable correlation extraction for wind turbine fault detection and identification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    11. Lu, Xuefei & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2023. "Global sensitivity analysis in epidemiological modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 9-24.
    12. Elianne Mora & Jenny Cifuentes & Geovanny Marulanda, 2021. "Short-Term Forecasting of Wind Energy: A Comparison of Deep Learning Frameworks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, November.
    13. Swanson, Laura, 2001. "Linking maintenance strategies to performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 237-244, April.
    14. Jian Guo & Saizhuo Wang & Lionel M. Ni & Heung-Yeung Shum, 2022. "Quant 4.0: Engineering Quantitative Investment with Automated, Explainable and Knowledge-driven Artificial Intelligence," Papers 2301.04020, arXiv.org.
    15. Ajagekar, Akshay & You, Fengqi, 2021. "Quantum computing based hybrid deep learning for fault diagnosis in electrical power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    16. Cao, Jason & Tao, Tao, 2025. "Can an identified environmental correlate of car ownership serve as a practical planning tool?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Pinjala, Srinivas Kumar & Pintelon, Liliane & Vereecke, Ann, 2006. "An empirical investigation on the relationship between business and maintenance strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 214-229, November.
    18. Hu'e Sullivan & Hurlin Christophe & P'erignon Christophe & Saurin S'ebastien, 2022. "Measuring the Driving Forces of Predictive Performance: Application to Credit Scoring," Papers 2212.05866, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    19. Zhang, Chanyuan (Abigail) & Cho, Soohyun & Vasarhelyi, Miklos, 2022. "Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    20. Bastos, João A. & Matos, Sara M., 2022. "Explainable models of credit losses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 386-394.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13198-022-01843-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.