IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v29y2018i6d10.1007_s10845-015-1179-5.html

Review, analysis and synthesis of prognostic-based decision support methods for condition based maintenance

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandros Bousdekis

    (National Technical University of Athens (NTUA))

  • Babis Magoutas

    (National Technical University of Athens (NTUA))

  • Dimitris Apostolou

    (University of Piraeus)

  • Gregoris Mentzas

    (National Technical University of Athens (NTUA))

Abstract

In manufacturing enterprises, maintenance is a significant contributor to the total company’s cost. Condition based maintenance (CBM) relies on prognostic models and uses them to support maintenance decisions based on the predicted condition of equipment. Although prognostic-based decision support for CBM is not an extensively explored area, there exist methods which have been developed in order to deal with specific challenges such as the need to cope with real-time information, to predict the health state of equipment and to continuously update maintenance-related recommendations. The current work aims at providing a literature review for prognostic-based decision support methods for CBM. We analyse the literature in order to identify combinations of methods for prognostic-based decision support for CBM, propose a practical technique for selecting suitable combinations of methods and set the guidelines for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandros Bousdekis & Babis Magoutas & Dimitris Apostolou & Gregoris Mentzas, 2018. "Review, analysis and synthesis of prognostic-based decision support methods for condition based maintenance," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1303-1316, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:29:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1179-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-015-1179-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-015-1179-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-015-1179-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Waeyenbergh, Geert & Pintelon, Liliane, 2009. "CIBOCOF: A framework for industrial maintenance concept development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 633-640, October.
    2. Grossman, Gene M. & Helpman, Elhanan, 2004. "Managerial incentives and the international organization of production," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 237-262, July.
    3. W. Davis Dechert & Kazuo Nishimura, 2012. "A Complete Characterization of Optimal Growth Paths in an Aggregated Model with a Non-Concave Production Function," Springer Books, in: John Stachurski & Alain Venditti & Makoto Yano (ed.), Nonlinear Dynamics in Equilibrium Models, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 237-257, Springer.
    4. Muller, Alexandre & Crespo Marquez, Adolfo & Iung, Benoît, 2008. "On the concept of e-maintenance: Review and current research," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(8), pages 1165-1187.
    5. George Battese & D. Rao & Christopher O'Donnell, 2004. "A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 91-103, January.
    6. Waeyenbergh, Geert & Pintelon, Liliane, 2002. "A framework for maintenance concept development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 299-313, June.
    7. Bouvard, K. & Artus, S. & Bérenguer, C. & Cocquempot, V., 2011. "Condition-based dynamic maintenance operations planning & grouping. Application to commercial heavy vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 601-610.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodrigo Barbosa de Santis & Tiago Silveira Gontijo & Marcelo Azevedo Costa, 2022. "Condition-based maintenance in hydroelectric plants: A systematic literature review," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(5), pages 631-646, October.
    2. Fan, Yuantao & Nowaczyk, Sławomir & Rögnvaldsson, Thorsteinn, 2020. "Transfer learning for remaining useful life prediction based on consensus self-organizing models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    3. Altinpulluk, Nur Banu & Altinpulluk, Deniz & Yildirim, Murat & Zhao, Shijia & Qiu, Feng & Greco, Aaron, 2025. "A survey on degradation modeling, prognosis, and prognostics-driven maintenance in wind energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Duan, Chaoqun & Gong, Ting & Yan, Liangwen & Li, Xinmin, 2024. "Bi-level corrected residual life-based maintenance for deteriorating systems under competing risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    5. Rodrigo Barbosa de Santis & Marcelo Azevedo Costa, 2020. "Extended Isolation Forests for Fault Detection in Small Hydroelectric Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Patrick Zschech, 2023. "Beyond descriptive taxonomies in data analytics: a systematic evaluation approach for data-driven method pipelines," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 193-227, March.
    7. Jeetesh Sharma & Murari Lal Mittal & Gunjan Soni, 2024. "Condition-based maintenance using machine learning and role of interpretability: a review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(4), pages 1345-1360, April.
    8. Mikhail, Mina & Ouali, Mohamed-Salah & Yacout, Soumaya, 2024. "A data-driven methodology with a nonparametric reliability method for optimal condition-based maintenance strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    9. Florian, Eleonora & Sgarbossa, Fabio & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Machine learning-based predictive maintenance: A cost-oriented model for implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    10. Barbosa de Santis, Rodrigo & Silveira Gontijo, Tiago & Azevedo Costa, Marcelo, 2021. "Condition-based maintenance in hydroelectric plants: A systematic literature review," MPRA Paper 115912, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faccio, M. & Persona, A. & Sgarbossa, F. & Zanin, G., 2014. "Industrial maintenance policy development: A quantitative framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 85-93.
    2. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    3. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    4. Özcan, Evren Can & Ünlüsoy, Sultan & Eren, Tamer, 2017. "A combined goal programming – AHP approach supported with TOPSIS for maintenance strategy selection in hydroelectric power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1410-1423.
    5. Van Horenbeek, Adriaan & Pintelon, Liliane, 2013. "A dynamic predictive maintenance policy for complex multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 39-50.
    6. Dawid, Herbert & Kopel, Michael, 1997. "On the Economically Optimal Exploitation of a Renewable Resource: The Case of a Convex Environment and a Convex Return Function," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 272-297, October.
    7. Bokrantz, Jon & Skoogh, Anders & Berlin, Cecilia & Stahre, Johan, 2017. "Maintenance in digitalised manufacturing: Delphi-based scenarios for 2030," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 154-169.
    8. Takashi Kamihigashi & John Stachurski, 2011. "Existence, Stability and Computation of Stationary Distributions: An Extension of the Hopenhayn-Prescott Theorem," Discussion Paper Series DP2011-32, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    9. Francesco Bartaloni, 2021. "Existence of the Optimum in Shallow Lake Type Models with Hysteresis Effect," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 190(2), pages 358-392, August.
    10. Le Van, Cuong & Schubert, Katheline & Nguyen, Tu Anh, 2010. "With exhaustible resources, can a developing country escape from the poverty trap?," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(6), pages 2435-2447, November.
    11. Eiichi Tomiura, 2005. "Technological Capability and FDI in Asia: Firm‐level Relationships among Japanese Manufacturers," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 19(3), pages 273-289, September.
    12. Silvia Saravia-Matus & T. S. Amjath-Babu & Sreejith Aravindakshan & Stefan Sieber & Jimmy A. Saravia & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, 2021. "Can Enhancing Efficiency Promote the Economic Viability of Smallholder Farmers? A Case of Sierra Leone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Wirat Krasachat & Suthathip Yaisawarng, 2021. "Directional Distance Function Technical Efficiency of Chili Production in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Anup Kumar Bhandari & Vipin V, 2018. "Does Export Intensity Affect Firm Performance? Evidence from Basic Metal Industry in India," Working Papers id:12767, eSocialSciences.
    15. Yongqi Feng & Haolin Zhang & Yung-ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang, 2021. "Innovation efficiency and the impact of the institutional quality: a cross-country analysis using the two-stage meta-frontier dynamic network DEA model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3091-3129, April.
    16. Stergiou, Eirini, 2022. "Environmental Efficiency of European Industries across Sectors and Countries," MPRA Paper 114635, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Conconi, Paola & Legros, Patrick & Newman, Andrew F., 2012. "Trade liberalization and organizational change," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 197-208.
    18. Inyoung Park & Jieon Lee & Jungwoo Nam & Yuri Jo & Daeho Lee, 2022. "Which networking strategy improves ICT startup companies' technical efficiency?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2434-2443, September.
    19. repec:hal:pseptp:hal-03261262 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Pol Antras & Elhanan Helpman, 2004. "Global Sourcing," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 112(3), pages 552-580, June.
    21. Haiqian Ke & Wenyi Yang & Xiaoyang Liu & Fei Fan, 2020. "Does Innovation Efficiency Suppress the Ecological Footprint? Empirical Evidence from 280 Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:29:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1179-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.