IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v23y2014i1d10.1007_s10726-012-9311-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mutual Performance Monitoring: Elaborating the Development of a Team Learning Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Rozz Albon

    (Sharjah Woman’s College)

  • Tony Jewels

    (American University in the Emirates)

Abstract

Preparing university graduates for the world of work must address teamness, a quality essential to working in complex and dynamic organizations. Mutual performance monitoring (MPM) highlighted as a fundamental component in the authors’ initial team learning theory is examined. It was thought that first year university students may not have the skills of MPM to affect high quality team outputs, and our results suggest this is true. It is proposed that students are supported with strategies which legitimize monitoring the work of their team members and that the ideas of collusion, spying and cheating are replaced with teamness. Further, it appears that many academics are unprepared or ill-equipped to prepare students for a world of work in teams. Exposing the naivety of students, presenting perceived and positive changes in team skills and suggesting strategies may provide some pedagogical guidance for academic educators to better implement team learning. This paper explores MPM as a building block in a more comprehensive theory of team learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Rozz Albon & Tony Jewels, 2014. "Mutual Performance Monitoring: Elaborating the Development of a Team Learning Theory," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 149-164, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:23:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s10726-012-9311-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-012-9311-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-012-9311-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-012-9311-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Misty L. Loughry & Henry L. Tosi, 2008. "Performance Implications of Peer Monitoring," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(6), pages 876-890, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bart A. De Jong & Katinka M. Bijlsma-Frankema & Laura B. Cardinal, 2014. "Stronger Than the Sum of Its Parts? The Performance Implications of Peer Control Combinations in Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1703-1721, December.
    2. Fernanda Odilla, 2020. "Oversee and Punish: Understanding the Fight Against Corruption Involving Government Workers in Brazil," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 140-152.
    3. Mortenson, Kristian G. & Pitre, Terence J., 2018. "Who benefits from share contracts?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 125-135.
    4. Claire Heffernan & Lena Azbel-Jackson & Joe Brownlie & George Gunn, 2016. "Farmer Attitudes and Livestock Disease: Exploring Citizenship Behaviour and Peer Monitoring across Two BVD Control Schemes in the UK," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Markus Kreutzer & Laura B. Cardinal & Jorge Walter & Christoph Lechner, 2016. "Formal and Informal Control as Complement or Substitute? The Role of the Task Environment," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(4), pages 235-255, December.
    6. Jorge Walter & Markus Kreutzer & Karin Kreutzer, 2021. "Setting the Tone for the Team: A Multi‐Level Analysis of Managerial Control, Peer Control, and their Consequences for Job Satisfaction and Team Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 849-878, May.
    7. Paul Varella & Mansour Javidan & David A. Waldman, 2012. "A Model of Instrumental Networks: The Roles of Socialized Charismatic Leadership and Group Behavior," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 582-595, April.
    8. Di Lorenzo, Francesco & Almeida, Paul, 2017. "The role of relative performance in inter-firm mobility of inventors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1162-1174.
    9. Radtke, Robin R. & Speklé, Roland F. & Widener, Sally K., 2023. "Flourish or flounder: Do trust-centric management controls encourage knowledge sharing and team performance?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    10. Tuba Bakici & Esteve Almirall & Jonathan Wareham, 2011. "Motives for Participation in On-Line Open Innovation Platforms," DRUID Working Papers 11-14, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    11. Jacobo Gomez‐Conde & Ernesto Lopez‐Valeiras & Ricardo Malagueño & José Carlos Tiomatsu Oyadomari, 2022. "Quality of performance metrics, informal peer monitoring and goal commitment," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 4041-4077, September.
    12. Terhi Chakhovich, 2010. "The role of outcome focus within subject positions tied to shareholder value," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(4), pages 450-475, November.
    13. Christian N. Thoroughgood & Kiyoung Lee & Katina B. Sawyer & Thomas J. Zagenczyk, 2022. "Change is Coming, Time to Undermine? Examining the Countervailing Effects of Anticipated Organizational Change and Coworker Exchange Quality on the Relationship Between Machiavellianism and Social Und," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 701-720, December.
    14. Jiaxin Wang & Shaohan Cai & Qinghong Xie & Lili Chen, 2022. "The influence of community engagement on seller opportunistic behaviors in e-commerce platform," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1377-1405, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:23:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s10726-012-9311-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.