IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i2d10.1007_s10668-024-05913-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a framework system for sustainability performance of cities: a case of Eskisehir city, Türkiye

Author

Listed:
  • Selcan Özbayrak

    (Eskişehir Technical University)

  • Alp Özdemir

    (Eskişehir Technical University)

Abstract

This study aims to facilitates sustainable city assessment, which is extremely useful yet intricate, to evaluate sustainability of cities through the identification of both their strengths and areas that can be further improved. For this purpose, an easy-to-apply assessment framework was established, and a practical tool in MS Excel was developed using the framework. The framework consists of defining objectives, determining indicators, weighting the indicators, collecting indicator data, scaling, and normalizing indicator values, and calculating and evaluating the sustainability performance of cities. In this study, an indicator set was created using forty-five criteria aligned with the triple-bottom-line sustainability categories. The indicator set was weighted through a questionnaire study with experts, followed by a scaling study using minimum–maximum data values for normalization. Subsequently, criteria scores were calculated and aggregated within sub-indicators to assess sustainability performance of cities. A case study was conducted in Eskisehir city and its results were compared to average value from eighty-one cities in Türkiye. The results indicate that Eskisehir’s sustainability performance for indicators- environmental at 68%, social at 74%, and economic at 66% -yields an overall weighted average of approximately 69%, with the best performance in social indicators and the lowest in economic indicators. This study contributes to by developing of a globally applicable framework for city sustainability assessment. It enables individual evaluation of cities based on their sustainability goals and provides a practical tool for assessing urban sustainability performance. The findings provide key insights for guiding investments and policy decisions, supporting evidence-based approaches for researchers, stakeholders, and investors. The tool’s implications for urban development include improving air quality, waste management, economic growth, and social justice, making the study highly relevant for sustainable urban futures.

Suggested Citation

  • Selcan Özbayrak & Alp Özdemir, 2025. "Developing a framework system for sustainability performance of cities: a case of Eskisehir city, Türkiye," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 5001-5037, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-024-05913-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-05913-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-05913-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-024-05913-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pingtao Yi & Weiwei Li & Lingyu Li, 2018. "Evaluation and Prediction of City Sustainability Using MCDM and Stochastic Simulation Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Peng, Shuyue & Jia, Ruoya & Wang, Qianrong & Li, Tongxin & Zhang, Congcong, 2023. "Role of city sustainability in utilizing the natural resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    3. Bohong Zheng & Komi Bernard Bedra, 2018. "Recent Sustainability Performance in China: Strength-Weakness Analysis and Ranking of Provincial Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    4. Juan Tang & Hong-lin Zhu & Zhi Liu & Fu Jia & Xiao-xue Zheng, 2019. "Urban Sustainability Evaluation under the Modified TOPSIS Based on Grey Relational Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Pasquale De Toro & Enrico Formato & Nicola Fierro, 2023. "Sustainability Assessments of Peri-Urban Areas: An Evaluation Model for the Territorialization of the Sustainable Development Goals," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-32, July.
    6. Mika Marttunen & Jyri Mustajoki & Suvi Sojamo & Lauri Ahopelto & Marko Keskinen, 2019. "A Framework for Assessing Water Security and the Water–Energy–Food Nexus—The Case of Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    7. Maxim, Alexandru, 2014. "Sustainability assessment of electricity generation technologies using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 284-297.
    8. Krajnc, Damjan & Glavič, Peter, 2005. "A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 189-208.
    9. Olivia Psara & Fernando Fonseca & Olympia Nisiforou & Rui Ramos, 2023. "Evaluation of Urban Sustainability Based on Transportation and Green Spaces: The Case of Limassol, Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Irik Z. Mukhametzyanov, 2020. "ReS-Algorithm for Converting Normalized Values of Cost Criteria Into Benefit Criteria in MCDM Tasks," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(05), pages 1389-1423, August.
    11. Iain D. Stewart & Chris A. Kennedy & Angelo Facchini & Renata Mele, 2018. "The Electric City as a Solution to Sustainable Urban Development," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 3-20, January.
    12. Pingtao Yi & Qiankun Dong & Weiwei Li & Lu Wang, 2023. "Assessment of city sustainability with the consideration of synergy among economy–society–environment criteria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7645-7668, August.
    13. B. Ahn & S. Choi, 2012. "Aggregation of ordinal data using ordered weighted averaging operator weights," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatma Sena Karal & Ayberk Soyer, 2024. "A systematic literature review: Setting a basis for smart and sustainable city performance measurement," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 555-573, February.
    2. Ruofan Liao & Zhengtao Chen & Jirakom Sirisrisakulchai & Jianxu Liu, 2025. "Enhancing Rural Economic Sustainability in China Through Agricultural Socialization Services: A Novel Perspective on Spatial-Temporal Dynamics," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, January.
    3. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid & Nemery, Philippe, 2016. "Which energy mix for the UK (United Kingdom)? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA (graphical analysis for interactive aid)–AHP (analytic hierarchy process) visualization tool," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 602-611.
    4. repec:rfh:jprjor:v:8:y:2022:i:2:p:1-15 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. L. Hay & A. H. B. Duffy & R. I. Whitfield, 2017. "The S‐Cycle Performance Matrix: Supporting Comprehensive Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Technical Systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 45-70, January.
    6. Nock, Destenie & Baker, Erin, 2019. "Holistic multi-criteria decision analysis evaluation of sustainable electric generation portfolios: New England case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 655-673.
    7. Qunxi Gong & Min Chen & Xianli Zhao & Zhigeng Ji, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Development System Measurement Based on Dissipative Structure Theory, the Grey Entropy Method and Coupling Theory: A Case Study in Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Baudry, Gino & Delrue, Florian & Legrand, Jack & Pruvost, Jérémy & Vallée, Thomas, 2017. "The challenge of measuring biofuel sustainability: A stakeholder-driven approach applied to the French case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 933-947.
    9. Abdul Rehman & Hengyun Ma & Magdalena Radulescu & Crenguta Ileana Sinisi & Loredana Maria Paunescu & MD Shabbir Alam & Rafael Alvarado, 2021. "The Energy Mix Dilemma and Environmental Sustainability: Interaction among Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Nuclear Energy, Urban Agglomeration, and Economic Growth," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Carayannis, Elias G. & Goletsis, Yorgos & Grigoroudis, Evangelos, 2018. "Composite innovation metrics: MCDA and the Quadruple Innovation Helix framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 4-17.
    11. Michinori Uwasu & Keishiro Hara & Masashi Kuroda & Ji Han, 2024. "Assessing the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Environmental Sustainability in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Assadi, Mohammad Reza & Ataebi, Melikasadat & Ataebi, Elmira sadat & Hasani, Aliakbar, 2022. "Prioritization of renewable energy resources based on sustainable management approach using simultaneous evaluation of criteria and alternatives: A case study on Iran's electricity industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 820-832.
    13. Ying Zhou & Weiwei Li & Pingtao Yi & Chengju Gong, 2019. "Evaluation of City Sustainability from the Perspective of Behavioral Guidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Rao, Amar & Srivastava, Mrinalini & Parihar, Jaya Singh & Chavriya, Shubham & Hosen, Mosharrof, 2024. "Minerals at the crossroads: Economic policies, global trade, and renewable energy in the global South," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    15. Pollesch, N.L. & Dale, V.H., 2016. "Normalization in sustainability assessment: Methods and implications," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 195-208.
    16. Zhifeng Wu & Senjing Zhai & Jiangtao Hong & Yibin Zhang & Keren Shi, 2018. "Building Sustainable Supply Chains for Organizations Based on QFD: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Chenjun Sun & Zengqiang Mi & Hui Ren & Zhipeng Jing & Jinling Lu & David Watts, 2019. "Multi-Dimensional Indexes for the Sustainability Evaluation of an Active Distribution Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    18. Roger Chapman Burk & Richard M. Nehring, 2023. "An Empirical Comparison of Rank-Based Surrogate Weights in Additive Multiattribute Decision Analysis," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 55-72, March.
    19. Ivona Ivić & Anita Cerić, 2024. "Mitigation Measures for Information Asymmetry between Participants in Construction Projects: The Impact of Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-27, August.
    20. Xiaowei Zeng & Xiaomei Yang & Shuai Zhong & Zhihua Wang & Yaxin Ding & Dan Meng & Ku Gao, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity at a National Scale: A Case Study of Southeast Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-32, March.
    21. Yinhui Wang & Yugang He & Xiaodan Gao, 2025. "Synergizing Renewable Energy and Circular Economy Strategies: Pioneering Pathways to Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-024-05913-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.